Mort Zuckerman: How to Get Americans Working Again

January 15, 2010 RSS Feed Print

There is no silver lining to the dark cloud that has enveloped America. A slight decline in the rate of job losses at the end of last year, coupled with a rise in the gross domestic product, gave hope that we were at the beginning of a sustained recovery from the Great Recession. The December jobs report has doused that hope.

Unemployment has graduated from being a difficulty, a headache, a setback, a worry. Now it is nothing less than a catastrophe. The true measure of it is that nearly a million Americans have become so demoralized that they are no longer even trying to find work. No fewer than 929,000 men and women who want a job haven't looked in the past year. That is nearly 50 percent more than the number who felt it was a hopeless quest a year ago (642,000 in 2008). With 15.3 million out of work in the longest and deepest downturn in our economy since the Great Depression, the unemployment rate managed to hold at 10 percent in December only because of an extraordinary shrinkage in the labor force: Some 661,000 gave up their searches for work. (Job losses totaled 85,000, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics' nonfarm payroll data; the bureau's household survey indicated a loss of 589,000 jobs.)

Roughly 40 percent of the unemployed, or a total of 6.1 million, have been out of work for more than 27 weeks. The average period of unemployment exceeds 26 weeks, the highest level in postwar history; the previous peak, in July 1983, was just 21.2 weeks. The better and more comprehensive measure of both the unemployed and underemployed, the household survey, edged up to 17.3 percent, up from 8.4 percent two years ago and just a shade below the all-time record. But the bureau's unemployment numbers are extrapolations from only 60,000 household interviews. Experts who have looked at these statistics and made adjustments to account for the survey's limitations get an unemployment/underemployment rate of a staggering 22 percent. Since the recession began, some 8.6 million jobs have been lost!

There is no end in sight. Because our potential labor force is expanding by almost 1.3 million job seekers annually, even if we had the strong job growth we saw in the 1990s, it would take at least six years to get unemployment down to 5 percent. Instead, businesses continue to slash labor costs at rates not seen in any downturn since World War II.

The fall in employment is so bad that last year's decline of 3.7 percent was the worst since 1938, when Franklin Roose­velt misjudged an incipient recovery and cut public investment, resulting in a 5.8 percent plunge in employment. See our descent: Last year's average unemployment rate was 9.3 percent, compared with 5.8 percent in 2008 and 4.6 percent in 2007. The employment-to-population ratio for men ages 25 to 54 is the lowest since the Bureau of Labor Statistics began keeping track in 1948. Those without a high school diploma have an unemployment rate of 15 percent, compared with 5 percent for those with a bachelor's degree or higher. For adult heads of household younger than 25, the unemployment rate is approximately 16 percent, reflecting the dearth of jobs for recent graduates and other young people.

More than 4 million people have exhausted their regular unemployment benefits and are surviving on emergency jobless insurance. And months after we supposedly emerged from the recession, we are facing about 450,000 monthly claims for unemployment insurance. Small businesses, the normal source for new jobs, are still shedding workers. Fewer than 10 percent added employees, while more than 20 percent cut back—and the cuts averaged nearly twice as many per firm as the hires at the expanding companies.

Economists may see the recession as being over, but the man in the street sees it differently. From his perspective, these are by far the worst times for American workers since the 1930s. Expectations are low, too. Roughly 60 percent of the public believes the recession still has a way to go, compared with 52 percent in September. Only 29 percent of those polled in a Wall Street Journal/NBC News Poll believe the economy has hit bottom. Even those who have not suffered know someone—a friend, a neighbor, a family member—who is being hurt. Two in three say the rally in the stock market has not changed their views.

Tags:
unemployment,
economy

Reader Comments Read all comments (46)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Foreigners are what America was built by, but now that it has been built, should we not be concerned about its foundation?

Great minds from other countries? WHY? Is everyone in America stupid? I don’t think so! If they are getting their education hear than that means the knowledge is already in the U.S. The problem is big business greed. Too many big companies want to see just how much they can make no matter the cost. Great, that is what running a successful business is all about but should it cost us our nation. OF COURSE NOT!

Off the top of my head, I can think of two companies that have contributed greatly to our dilemma. The first company gets the majority of its products from oversee by ship. The ship arrives in America fully loaded but leaves completely empty. I was once told that, “I don’t want to shop hear but I can’t afford not to.” The next company said that the American cattle industry could not keep up with their supply and demand. If given the opportunity I am sure the Cattle Industry would be willing to take on that challenge.

The bottom line is, we need to start relying on each other. If foreign products are a must, than we should tell them to set up shop in the U.S and build their products hear. Create jobs hear and not there.

MaReComm1100 of GA 11:51AM March 17, 2010

Unemployment=profits

danny of PA 1:17PM February 05, 2010

So the "solution" is to repeat the same failed policies that the Japanese tried all during the 1990s?

Read the "Lost Decade" by Gary Saxonhouse and Robert Stern Mr Zuckerman, Your ideas have been tried and they failed miserably.

On the other hand, Reagan faced a much worse Recession in 1982 he ignored your advice and instead did the opposite. He gave the money back to the people. The result was the 1980s boom, the longest, strongest, peace time expansion of the US Econmy in history.

John Knight of MN 1:44PM January 23, 2010

advertisement

Debate Club

Was 2011 One of the Worst Years for the U.S. Government in American History?

Experts debate where 2011 ranks among Washington's worst years.

Latest Video

advertisement

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

Barack Obama's $5.6 Billion Valentine's Day Tax

An Americans for Tax Reform report shows the federal tax burden on love.

It's Too Early to Write Off Either Rick Santorum or Mitt Romney

Barack Obama and John McCain traveled unlikely paths to their nominations in 2008.

On Contraception Mandate, Obama Blunders Into the Culture Wars

Obama's contraception "compromise" is a gimmick that voters will see right through.

Why Mitt Romney Can't Sell Himself to Conservatives

Voters want to know if they can trust Mitt Romney.

Americans Deserve Political Freedom from the Catholic Church

Church leaders could not have been less gracious towards Obama's surrender on contraception.

What the Catholic Contraceptive Debate Is Really About

Today's debates about contraception and inequality are intertwined in that the bring up the question of morality.

Why the Catholic Contraception Controversy Is a Phony Battle

The Catholic Church is asking the Obama administration to do something it cannot do itself: limit birth control use.

Obama’s Contraceptive 'Compromise' Doesn't Pass the Smell Test

The so-called "accommodation" on contraceptive coverage reinforces the administration's commitment to its pro-choice agenda.