Mort Zuckerman: U.S. No Longer the Great Job Creation Machine

December 4, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (33)

The U.S. economy is facing a sustained adjustment process that will deepen this recession. It is not simply a shortfall in demand but reflects deeper shifts relating to the unraveling of financial imbalances.

The result is an economic framework in which labor markets are still deteriorating; pay rate deflation is increasingly common; small businesses remain under stress without precedent in more than 60 years; business bankruptcies have been rising exponentially; and credit remains extraordinarily tight for most households and moderate-size businesses and is continuing to worsen. Large corporations are downsizing, but the worst job losses are in the small-business sector. Small- and medium-size enterprises—and especially start-ups—have been engines of job growth. Firms with fewer than 20 workers employ a quarter of the workforce. But in the last economic expansion, they accounted for 4 out of 10 new jobs. These are the businesses that are getting crushed.

Some estimates predict the unemployment rate will be as high as 8 percent for as long as five to 10 years, worse than in any previous 10-year period since the 1930s. Such high unemployment will shrink the number of households, undermine housing demand, devastate discretionary spending, intensify defaults on debt, reduce export growth and hence capacity needs, strengthen forces for protectionism, and demoralize millions of people.

Under these conditions, only the government has the capacity to launch the necessary compensatory programs to increase job creation.

One suggestion is to undertake an all-out infrastructure program reminiscent of President Franklin Roosevelt's Works Progress Administration during the Great Depression, which immediately generated jobs. We could find a way to substitute paying people unemployment insurance and use this money to pay workers something on the order of minimum wage to produce something. There could be a requirement that 50 percent of the jobless be taken off unemployment rolls and paid the minimum wage until they find a better job, thus reducing the overall cost. The pay would be low enough to create an incentive to find better-compensated private-sector jobs, but the government would be the employer of last resort and dedicate these workers to improving the quality of our worn-out infrastructure, training our unemployed, and working as assistants in schools, courts, hospitals, child-care centers, and the like. The Economic Policy Institute argues that spending $40 billion a year for three years on public-service employment would create at least a million jobs.

Another critical measure must be to help out fiscally strapped state and local governments that have seen their tax receipts plunge and face huge layoffs. A third step would be to dramatically expand Small Business Administration financing for small businesses, which have generated 64 percent of all the new jobs created in the past 15 years and employ half of all U.S. workers, according to the SBA. There is no time to lose.

Corrected on 12/07/09: An earlier version of this commentary misstated the year for which a budget shortfall is expected for states, cities, counties, and school districts. That shortfall is expected for 2010.

Tags:
recession,
employment,
unemployment

Reader Comments Read all comments (33)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

As David Meiswinkle Indepenendt candidate for NJ govenor all we have to do is re[peal and revoke Natfa and Cafta Trade treaties and get the USA out of the WTO, by voter petition, and politicians who do not agree vote them our or impeach them or petition to recall them like they did to Gov. Gray Davis in Calif.

Rmemeber this country is in a global trade war and the middle-class and our jobs and children's future are at stake. Nothing is impossible if enough American Voters exert their political will power in a inified manner. If we do not bring the jobs back to the USA the states will never have enough revenue or taxes to survive. If the idiots that passed this realized that as soon as the middle class is extinct there will be no one to pay the largest share of taxes and consume the most products in the USA. Even the rich should consider that without the MC to support our US economy they will be the only ones left to tax into oblivion. If they were smart they would bring back the middle class jobs now if for no other reason than to save their own wealth. Not to mention economic control and sovereignty over our own nation rather than by some foreign power such as China.

notrequired of CA 1:45AM June 27, 2010

Quoting Zuckerman: We must face the hard fact that many of the lost jobs are gone forever. In this cycle, 56 percent of the currently unemployed have permanently lost their jobs, according to Ned Davis Research. These people have lost their jobs because plants have closed, work has moved overseas, or companies have gone out of business. This compares with an earlier peak in 1982 and 1991 of 43 percent.

The loss of manufacturing is the problem and has been occurring since the 1960's. When a people will not purchase the very product they, themselves make. Instead they purchase the same product made in a nation where the worker is paid, between $2.00 to $3.00 a day, somewhere in the future, the manufacturer those people work for has to close its doors and move to the country with the lesser wage. You cannot demand the highest wage with the most benefits in the world and turn around and buy from these countries. All your monies go out of country. Pat, no denials, See it for yourself. What is it, 14 trillion in debt now? Jobs gone, now the wail "Woe is me!".

I told this to the carpenters Union in the late 1960s, and was called Crab Grass. I hear there is virtually no union carpenters in the housing market in Ca. now.

So how do we retrieve jobs? Will it cause a war with China? Will China call in their loans? It is a conundrum. Don't you think.

Jim D Hise of AR 2:26PM January 29, 2010

1. U.S. economists are morons. Let's kill all the economists.

2. In a global free trade environment, jobs flow to China and India, which have 10% of our labor costs.

3. Numbers of legal and illegal immigrants are unparalleled in US history, increasing competition for jobs.

4. It doesn't seem to be in American character to maintain quality like the Japanese and Germans.

5. Manufacturing is derided. Supposedly we're in an "advanced" post-industrial period. In reality, manufacturing IS the high technology sector of the economy, as manufactures and their processes are designed by engineers and scientists, often thousands of them over a period of decades. Compare building a Boeing jetliner, which has required thousands of engineers and inventors to produce over the years, with "information technology," the darling of the media. Putting up a website is really non-mathematical high school level stuff for the most part.

6. Unfortunately manufacturing employs for the most part unskilled production workers, making manufacturing jobs susceptible to being moved to any low wage country.

7. The US was a great innovator in the past, with great inventors like Thomas Edison, ...John Bardeen, Jerome Lemelson. Patents give you about a twenty year headstart in starting and dominating new industries--about the only way to protect yourself from low wage competition is a patent and the frontrunner's advantage in technology. Unfortunately US innovation died about 1970 when cheapo businessmen started making use of Ted Kennedy's chamberpot immigration policies to displace the great R&D teams we had that dominated the world with garbage from the third world. US techs left the field in droves upon seeing the tsunami of immigrants, so that now we are pathetically striving to compete with world class Japanese and German engineers with third worlders doing third world level R&D. A lot of economists and liberal arts people still don't get that it's quality that counts, not quantity, and still call for more and more H-1B's and chamberpot immigrants. Another problem is political correctness. If your highest priority is getting women and minorities into science and engineering, then quality must assume a lower rank. Then worst of all there is "hired-to-invent." Increasing R&D costs gave rise to the employed inventor, and employed R&D people for the most part have no rights to their inventions, and thus no financial incentive to do ought but hack work. Would you invent a transistor if you only got a buck for it? Probably not with any enthusiasm. That's why if you visit a research lab you need to bring a mirror to hold to the lips of the scientists to see if they are engaged in research or may have expired. Reminds me of the decadence of Rome: Tiger Woods gets a billion for hitting a ball, but if you invent a transistor you get a buck.

Linda Re of KY 4:51AM December 09, 2009

advertisement

Debate Club

Should There Be Such a Thing as 'Reporter's Privilege'?

Experts debate the ability reporters to protect their sources even in the face of a government investigation.

Latest Videos

advertisement

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

Poll Finds Congress' Popularity Hits Historic Lows

Polling shows Congress has achieved historic unpopularity.

House GOP 20 Week Abortion Ban Vote Was a Waste of Time

Abortion should be left up to the states.

The NSA, Guns and Privacy in the Obama Administration

The Obama administration’s needs to take a long look in the mirror after revelations about government surveillance.

Polls Show American People Hate Almost Everything About Politics

The American people are breaking up with politics.

Do You Believe NSA Leaker Edward Snowden or President Obama?

Should we take the word of the NSA leaker or Obama?

Obama, Boehner and the GOP Crisis of Leadership

It’s tough for anyone to lead when some in the GOP seem committed to their own destruction.

Obamacare Opponents Have to Keep Pushing Repeal

The way to repeal Obamacare is to hasten its ugly results.

Can Obama's Berlin Speech Match John F. Kennedy's and Ronald Reagan's?

The two famous Berlin speeches almost never were.