Mort Zuckerman: U.S. No Longer the Great Job Creation Machine

December 4, 2009 RSS Feed Print

There's a little candle in the dark in the trend of unemployment just reported. But to give it perspective, General Electric recently posted job openings for 90 $13-an-hour positions assembling washing machines at a plant in Louisville, Ky., and received 10,000 online applications. Clearly, 9,910 had to be rejected.

The volume of eager workers is a tsunami. Employers have shed 8.2 million jobs since December of 2007; 5.9 million Americans have been out of work for more than half a year. On top of that, the unemployment rate has risen by 5.1 percent of the workforce in the past 18 months, the largest increase since the Great Depression. The proportion of the workforce out of work for more than 15 weeks is the highest in 60 years. We have lost 6.6 million manufacturing jobs since 2000. We can take a little consolation, but not much, in the fact that the average workweek has increased from 33 to 33.2 hours.

Today, 21 percent of all families have an immediate family member who is unemployed, and 33 percent have an immediate family member or close friend who has lost a job. This affects not only the unemployed but also the family members who depend on them.

Naturally, millions of people fear they are next. Families are already living with a decline in their net worth because home values have dropped by an average of 30 percent and financial assets are worth nothing near what they were. The Wall Street Journal reports that 23 percent of households have mortgages that exceed the value of their homes. That's almost 11 million homes. About half the mortgages are 20 percent higher than the value of the house, and 520,000 homes are already in default. This is an overhang that is bound to put a damper on residential construction, which in the past has been an important source of employment, and that is unlikely to improve anytime soon. In the most recent survey, only 9 percent of families said their income increased this year, the lowest recorded in the 60-year-old survey. And for the first time in the survey's history, the majority of families said they thought their incomes would stay the same or fall.

The nervousness of millions of Americans is entirely justifiable. They see economic head winds all about them. The biggest economy in the world is held hostage by shoppers and consumers who are scared and pessimistic.

What are our job prospects? The problem in the job market going forward is not so much layoffs in the private sector, which are abating, but a lack of hiring. The federal stimulus program is offset by the estimate that there will be a 2010 budget shortfall for states, cities, counties, and school districts in the range of an astonishing $250 billion. Since virtually all states and cities have to run balanced budgets, the result will be reduced services, layoffs, and tax hikes. As Harold Meyerson points out in the Washington Post, this will reduce net government spending to boost the economy to approximately 1 percent of gross domestic product, thus diminishing the effectiveness of the government's efforts to combat the recession.And there is a major credit crunch constraining consumer spending and squeezing small businesses. There is virtually a total freeze in credit for small businesses. This is particularly ominous because small start-ups provide most of the economy's new jobs. If these businesses can't keep credit lines open, those jobs simply disappear. All this is reflected in cutbacks in the number of credit cards, credit lines, and loans from small banks. Meanwhile, the number of personal credit cards for consumers is down by 150 million, and personal credit lines have been reduced by $500 billion, from $1.3 trillion to $800 billion. This trend is expected to continue. Consumer spending is off 12 percent per shopping trip. Consumers are simply not buying expensive goods; they hunt for bargains. This in turn is punishing for many small businesses with small margins.

Medium-size businesses are constrained by the risk-analysis lending of the financial world, which prefers to lend to large businesses that are deemed more creditworthy. But while these big businesses have access to financing, they are holding back in hiring because of anxiety over the Obama administration's policies on such matters as increased healthcare costs, higher taxes, more corporate regulations, and disaffecting labor policies.

Corrected on 12/07/09: An earlier version of this commentary misstated the year for which a budget shortfall is expected for states, cities, counties, and school districts. That shortfall is expected for 2010.

Tags:
unemployment,
employment,
recession

Reader Comments Read all comments (33)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

As David Meiswinkle Indepenendt candidate for NJ govenor all we have to do is re[peal and revoke Natfa and Cafta Trade treaties and get the USA out of the WTO, by voter petition, and politicians who do not agree vote them our or impeach them or petition to recall them like they did to Gov. Gray Davis in Calif.

Rmemeber this country is in a global trade war and the middle-class and our jobs and children's future are at stake. Nothing is impossible if enough American Voters exert their political will power in a inified manner. If we do not bring the jobs back to the USA the states will never have enough revenue or taxes to survive. If the idiots that passed this realized that as soon as the middle class is extinct there will be no one to pay the largest share of taxes and consume the most products in the USA. Even the rich should consider that without the MC to support our US economy they will be the only ones left to tax into oblivion. If they were smart they would bring back the middle class jobs now if for no other reason than to save their own wealth. Not to mention economic control and sovereignty over our own nation rather than by some foreign power such as China.

notrequired of CA 1:45AM June 27, 2010

Quoting Zuckerman: We must face the hard fact that many of the lost jobs are gone forever. In this cycle, 56 percent of the currently unemployed have permanently lost their jobs, according to Ned Davis Research. These people have lost their jobs because plants have closed, work has moved overseas, or companies have gone out of business. This compares with an earlier peak in 1982 and 1991 of 43 percent.

The loss of manufacturing is the problem and has been occurring since the 1960's. When a people will not purchase the very product they, themselves make. Instead they purchase the same product made in a nation where the worker is paid, between $2.00 to $3.00 a day, somewhere in the future, the manufacturer those people work for has to close its doors and move to the country with the lesser wage. You cannot demand the highest wage with the most benefits in the world and turn around and buy from these countries. All your monies go out of country. Pat, no denials, See it for yourself. What is it, 14 trillion in debt now? Jobs gone, now the wail "Woe is me!".

I told this to the carpenters Union in the late 1960s, and was called Crab Grass. I hear there is virtually no union carpenters in the housing market in Ca. now.

So how do we retrieve jobs? Will it cause a war with China? Will China call in their loans? It is a conundrum. Don't you think.

Jim D Hise of AR 2:26PM January 29, 2010

1. U.S. economists are morons. Let's kill all the economists.

2. In a global free trade environment, jobs flow to China and India, which have 10% of our labor costs.

3. Numbers of legal and illegal immigrants are unparalleled in US history, increasing competition for jobs.

4. It doesn't seem to be in American character to maintain quality like the Japanese and Germans.

5. Manufacturing is derided. Supposedly we're in an "advanced" post-industrial period. In reality, manufacturing IS the high technology sector of the economy, as manufactures and their processes are designed by engineers and scientists, often thousands of them over a period of decades. Compare building a Boeing jetliner, which has required thousands of engineers and inventors to produce over the years, with "information technology," the darling of the media. Putting up a website is really non-mathematical high school level stuff for the most part.

6. Unfortunately manufacturing employs for the most part unskilled production workers, making manufacturing jobs susceptible to being moved to any low wage country.

7. The US was a great innovator in the past, with great inventors like Thomas Edison, ...John Bardeen, Jerome Lemelson. Patents give you about a twenty year headstart in starting and dominating new industries--about the only way to protect yourself from low wage competition is a patent and the frontrunner's advantage in technology. Unfortunately US innovation died about 1970 when cheapo businessmen started making use of Ted Kennedy's chamberpot immigration policies to displace the great R&D teams we had that dominated the world with garbage from the third world. US techs left the field in droves upon seeing the tsunami of immigrants, so that now we are pathetically striving to compete with world class Japanese and German engineers with third worlders doing third world level R&D. A lot of economists and liberal arts people still don't get that it's quality that counts, not quantity, and still call for more and more H-1B's and chamberpot immigrants. Another problem is political correctness. If your highest priority is getting women and minorities into science and engineering, then quality must assume a lower rank. Then worst of all there is "hired-to-invent." Increasing R&D costs gave rise to the employed inventor, and employed R&D people for the most part have no rights to their inventions, and thus no financial incentive to do ought but hack work. Would you invent a transistor if you only got a buck for it? Probably not with any enthusiasm. That's why if you visit a research lab you need to bring a mirror to hold to the lips of the scientists to see if they are engaged in research or may have expired. Reminds me of the decadence of Rome: Tiger Woods gets a billion for hitting a ball, but if you invent a transistor you get a buck.

Linda Re of KY 4:51AM December 09, 2009

advertisement

Debate Club

Was 2011 One of the Worst Years for the U.S. Government in American History?

Experts debate where 2011 ranks among Washington's worst years.

Latest Video

advertisement

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

Obama’s Contraceptive 'Compromise' Doesn't Pass the Smell Test

The so-called "accommodation" on contraceptive coverage reinforces the administration's commitment to its pro-choice agenda.

On Women in Combat, Rick Santorum Insults Military Men

To suggest that the men in our armed forces cannot control their emotions is a real slap at the professionals who wear the uniform.

To Avoid a Failed February, Mitt Romney Needs a Big Idea

Mitt Romney needs a big idea to rouse enthusiasm for his campaign.

How Mitt Romney Should Respond to the Improving Economy

Even if the economy continues to improve, Mitt Romney still can present a better plan than Barack Obama's.

The Problems With the Catholic Church and Birth Control

The Catholic Church's stance on birth control is a slippery slope, as an Obama administration ruling highlights.

Democrats Rebelling Against Obama Birth Control Policy

Some Democrats are among most publicly opposed the an Obama policy requiring religious institutions to cover contraceptives.

Catholic Birth Control Fight About Healthcare, Not Just Religion

The framing of the issue of required contraceptive coverage in religious terms obscures the real question.

Rick Santorum's Sweep Means It’s Still Anybody’s Race

The GOP finds itself in the unusual position of not being sure who its nominee will eventually be.