Litmus-test Conservatives Drive Republican Party Farther South

GOP's closed-minded, regional politics no longer play on the national scene

May 12, 2009 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (8)

In 1965, President Lyndon Johnson was congratulated by a staffer after he signed the historic Voting Rights Act into law. LBJ responded grimly that he had just delivered the South to the Republican Party.

Johnson was right in a large sense because the Grand Old Party has settled into being a regional party with few exceptions. Republicans deny it, but look at the record.

George W. Bush was elected president in 2000 and re-elected in 2004 by winning every Southern and Southwestern state—13 of them with 158 electoral votes. He didn't need many more states to hit the 270 mark.

President Obama broke that barrier last year by winning Florida, Virginia, and North Carolina, but the McCain-Palin ticket won the other 10 for the bulk of its losing total.

The once Solid South of the New Deal days of Democrat Franklin Roosevelt has switched to the GOP with a vengeance.

In the Senate, both members are Republicans in Mississippi, Alabama, South Carolina, Georgia, Tennessee, Kentucky, Texas, and Oklahoma. There are no African-American Republicans in the House since J.C. Watts of Oklahoma retired. (Eleanor Holmes Norton of the District of Columbia is a nonvoting delegate.)

In Congress, Southern Republicans are generally quiet on civil rights. There is no champion like the late Jack Kemp or retired Gen. Colin Powell with the courage to challenge fellow Republicans.

When Obama names his choice to the Supreme Court to replace retiring Justice David Souter, the lead Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee will be Jeff Sessions of Alabama. It will likely make no difference to Sessions on Obama's choice because Sessions will wade in to label him or her an activist or even a radical.

Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina said the other day that the Republican Party would continue to be a minority if it refused membership to those agreeing with it just 70 percent of the time. Graham should speak directly to Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Ann Coulter, or even former Vice President Dick Cheney, who have a much different view.

In fact, Cheney is giving interviews these days to venues like a radio station in North Dakota to warn against the party going moderate in any way. Where is an influential Republican willing to tell Cheney to get lost? John McCain's daughter seems to be a voice in the wilderness on urging Cheney to shut up.

Cheney went national with his rigid views on CBS's Face the Nation on Sunday. He said he'd take Rush Limbaugh's take on the party rather than Colin Powell's. That says it all on Cheney's look into the future.

Even the new GOP national chairman, African-American Michael Steele, is having trouble finding his voice to challenge the litmus-test conservatives in the party.

A trio of Republicans, former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, and Rep. Erick Cantor of Virginia hosted a recent meeting to outline new ideas for a party that has lost the last two national elections.

The immediate question is whether the party is willing to accept more minorities—African-Americans as well as the growing Hispanic vote in the Sun Belt.

If the answer is no, the GOP can drone on endlessly about a comeback and still lose. A failure to move beyond that Southern base, and hoping Obama will fail, is a questionable formula.

Check out our political cartoons .

Tags:
conservatives,
Republican Party

Reader Comments Read all comments (8)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I am a Republican, but there is NOT a party for an intellectual conservative. The GOP has been dumbed down to the point that now it is almost comical. I am also a Northener and it doesn't escape my attention that everytime an elected GOP'er speaks that he has a Southern twang. There is a name for an historically all white southern party and they are called the KKK. But even the KKK has more women in their organization than the GOP. That's right, the KKK is more diverse than the GOP. If the Republicans lose Hispanics like we have permanently lost African Americans then the GOP becomes the Whig party. Bigots like Limbaugh,Tancredo and Sessions have already cemented that. Hispanics voted 2 to 1 for Obama and in 4 years that might be 3 to 1. If that happens, Texas will go blue and that means the GOP will never win another national election!

Cloaked in religiosity does not help, atheists are the 2nd fastest growing group in the US since 2000 behind Hispanics. Atheists are now 16% of the US pop. Atheists are usually better educated and according to a Rasmussen last year, 97% of American atheists voted in 08. 68% support for Obama pre-Palin which meant McCain was actually getting almost 30%! After the convention, Obama recieved 89% of that vote. Only African Americans had a higher % of support.

Speaking of Palin, it is my point of a party dumbed down. I and about 10 of my friends no more about global events than she does. The anti-intellectualism has ran rampant in the GOP for so long that we are at a point were a Palin can actually be on a national ticket??? Can my party, which Ive been a registered voter of since 80 devolve any further? Sure it can! She can be the nominee in 3 years! It is certainly what the Dems are praying for. Seeing her debate Obama would be painful. PAINFUL!!!!!!!!! Hell, I would vote for PBO if Palin was the nominee in 12. Any party that would nominate Palin does not want to win an election but make a statement. Palin cannot play victim all the way to the WH. Playing victim seems to be this quitter's strongest attribute.

We must stop being reactionary! Within 48 hrs, Romney is issuing a statement crticizing Obama's response or lack of. Is that what a statesman does? Make comments before factson the ground are known? Romney looked like a fool. Gingrich calling Sotomayor a racist, IDIOT! If he thought before speaking he wouldn't have had to later issue an apology! We are playing checkers and the Obama admin is playing chess!!

Like I said, I am a Republican. While the Dems love Palin and Limbaugh be because it ensures that the GOP will be out of power, I want to see changes.

Don Yablis of CO 9:42PM July 17, 2009

Southerners are some of the finest people I know. Despite the media/Hollywierd stereotypes, they are fierce defenders of self-reliance, hard work, family and basic moral values. If one believes the likes of MSNBC and CNN, one would think these were "bad" things.

I believe America was built on these very qualities and I am encouraged when I see those from every state in this nation stand up and declare they still believe in these qualities too.

SEE: TEAPARTY

The writer should really check his history and realize that our last pacifist/brave new world/Democratic President was a man from Georgia named Jimmy Carter. Well after LBJ.

He too was a one-termer that inspired the nation to return to conservative values after his disasterous Presidency.

Only 53% of America bought in to Obama's "change" as I am now ashamed to admit that I bought into Carter's "change".

All we got was ole time Democratic Religion that believes they know best how to spend YOUR money.

Bad idea then ,BAD IDEA NOW.

Chris Petty of GA 1:07AM May 15, 2009

I see ol' "one note" is back with a vengeance! That would be you, R.L.! Don't know how I missed the notice of your election as sheriff/enforcer of Catholic Church teachings-or is it judge and jury; actually you seem to be playing God. Is that it? Do

you think you should be God? That'd explain a lot. Delusions of grandeur and all that. Where did you get so much anger and all that raging 'holier than thou' attitude, anyway? We're all sure you're not God 'cuz the real God preaches compassion, forgiveness, love, tolerance and, oh yeah-that line about "do not judge lest you be judged" - so we know that's not you! Words like rigid, controlling, perfectionist, judgmental all seem more apt descriptions in your case. So, sorry, you do not get to decide the goodness, morality or sinfulness of others or if they're Catholic enough-in the way You define it, of course, or if they'll go to Heaven. Well, maybe if you're the Pope..are you the Pope?! Naw, couldn't be! So,rant away if you must, but we're not buying it. And, lay off the character assassination-it's pathetic, childish, ineffective and reflects poorly only on you. Your responsibility is for yourself and your relationship with God, which does not include monitoring & enforcing others morals & behaviors- or damning them for what YOU perceive as their shortcomings & sins. So often in life it is those who feel least worthy who try the most to control others, rather than face their own demons. You might look into that... And see if you can't get a nice big hug from someone this week; I think it'd do you some good. Peace, child.

Clas of CA 10:00AM May 14, 2009

advertisement

Latest Videos

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

Obamacare Opponents Have to Keep Pushing Repeal

The way to repeal Obamacare is to hasten its ugly results.

Can Obama's Berlin Speech Match John F. Kennedy's and Ronald Reagan's?

The two famous Berlin speeches almost never were.

Reform Conservatives Need to Tackle Unemployment and Jobs

"Reform conservatives" are doing good work, but need to think about the ills of long-term unemployment.

If Background Checks are Good Enough for Guns, They're Good Enough for Jobs

Employers need to be able to consider all factors before making a hire.

NSA Leaker Edward Snowden Is Neither a Whistle-Blower Nor a Civil Disobeyer

Resisters who break a law must accept that they may be arrested and have a duty to submit to punishment.

Obama Should Bring Small Business Owners on His Trip to Africa

This country needs a national reality show.

Syria, Israel and the Obama Administration's Absentee Foreign Policy

Creating a mess you are going to leave for someone else to clean up is not a good way to manage U.S. foreign policy.

advertisement