IRS Gets G-20 Tool Against Tax Cheats; Guns in America

G-20 decision would give tax cheats nowhere to hide the loot

April 7, 2009 RSS Feed Print
John Mashek

John Mashek

Of the decisions made by the G-20 in London last week, the most relevant to U.S. taxpayers may be a crackdown on the hiding of assets in foreign banks. It is white-collar crime with a capital C.

For far too long, the Internal Revenue Service has been deprived of taxes by calculating cheaters. Estimates have run into the tens of billions. Switzerland has always been targeted as the main haven for concealing money. Swiss banks have historically been silent partners to the scheme.

When final details are announced, it should be firm on countries, with sanctions imposed for those who don't comply.

Perhaps it was just symbolic, but a federal grand jury in Boca Raton, Fla., indicted a CPA last week for hiding assets of his clients. With the April 15 tax deadline only a week away, it could be a warning sign to any taxpayers or accountants who are planning to avoid taxes due.

Confidence in the IRS ebbs and flows over time. In the Nixon administration, enemies of the president were targeted for phony audits. It was not a proud moment for the government.

Most taxpayers have their taxes withheld by their employers. They should expect equal treatment for the wealthy taxpayers. There is some feeling that the Obama administration is trying to soak the rich and entrepreneurs who provide jobs for workers. In the nation's progressive tax system, it is only fair that the wealthy pay more.

Ultimately, the coffers of the Treasury are certain to benefit if the G-20 plan succeeds. With all of us obliged to file returns on April 15, we need assurance all are paying their share—no more, no less.

A postscript on my column last week on gun control:

A few days after the column, 13 innocents were slaughtered in Binghamton, N.Y., by a gunman at an immigration study center. A day later, three police officers in Pittsburgh were murdered while answering a call about a domestic dispute. Friends of that gunman, who had several weapons including an AK-47, said he was worried the Obama administration would seize his guns. Where did he get that idea, since the president and Congress have been silent on any measure to control guns?

For readers of the column who used only insults as a response, there is no response. For those who want a dialogue on mass murders after Columbine, Virginia Tech, and recent killings, isn't it time?

Tags:
IRS,
banking,
G-20,
taxes

Reader Comments Read all comments (13)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

It's a fact that there are very few gun related crimes in England as carrying a gun is illegal. This has also reduced overall crime in England tremendously. You can't compare that to self defense needs in a war zone.

Tim Anders of NE 5:05AM June 21, 2010

When they had problems with mass killings in schools in Israel and Thailand do you think they put up a sign declaring it a "gun free zone"? Nope. Instead they created incentives for the teachers, parents, and administrators to carry firearms at the schools. Guess what happened? Schools "miraculously" stopped being an easy target.

It's been illegal to kill people for a very long time but that doesn't seem to stop murderers. Why would additional gun laws stop them from having guns?

Alan of CA 10:57PM April 01, 2010

I am generally someone who believes in live and let live. I also believe that the United States of America is still the one Shining Beacon on the Hill in the world. Having said that I have to say that there are definitely problems in our republic. The least of which is gun ownership. I do not personally own a gun. The reason is that it is my right not to own one and I do not feel that there is a government tyrant hiding behind a bush in my yard about to trounce on me and take me off to jail for my political beliefs. I also don't own a gun because I feel safe in my own home and, more importantly, my own skin. I also don't own a gun because, even though I have handled them, shot them and, in my younger days hunted with them, and do not have the need, as some do, to hold a cold piece of very dangerous steel in my hands. I have a problem with many groups of people who are strong gun advocates, not with their right to have the gun, but with the way they express their right and in many ways how they tend to pass on e-mail rumors to others with out ever going to a reputable fact check web site(s). When I read comments of many gun advocates I see the same rumors, discredited rumors, over and over and then, almost invariably, some type of demonizing, or belittling statement about government or about those who disagree with the advocate. Earlier this week, I read one of these statements asserting the following: "Now, assuming that we, as American's, can no longer purchase ammo/gun's. The Gov't can and is already running rampant believing that they will have no opposition" As stated, I do not own a gun, but I have no doubt that I could go to any gun store and buy 'ammo', and if I had a compelling reason for owning one, a gun, after a few days of waiting If the writer is not a felon, is over twenty one and has the proper identification, he/she should have no trouble with either of these. The same writer demonized all Liberals by saying "As of today, All of you Liberal's can laugh. But soon, you will (be) calling your friend's COMRADE." Please--COMRADE--isn't this a bit archaic, communism is long dead. Then, he/she belittled anyone who disagrees with him/her by saying "As a society, we are in BIG trouble, as an American, we are doomed unless we stand up and let this (sic) idiot's (sic) know that we are tired and we are NOT going to take their BS anymore" By reading this I ask who is the "idiot" and what is "their BS"? After reading poorly constructed screeds such as these,I feel that we are in big trouble because many in our great country are becoming less civil with each other. We are in trouble because too many of us get our news and our opinions not by in depth study and contemplation of documented facts, but from pundits who offer less than a balanced view of the truth. My fear for this country comes from the compounding of ignorance when well intentioned people forward and applaud the views like the quoted writer.

Gary Corbin of MO 8:44AM March 27, 2010

advertisement

Debate Club

Was 2011 One of the Worst Years for the U.S. Government in American History?

Experts debate where 2011 ranks among Washington's worst years.

Latest Video

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

Romney's Bain Experience Wasn't Real American Capitalism

The fact that Bain Capital served to make money for investors, not to create jobs, could endanger Romney.

Why Is Mitt Romney Embracing Birther Donald Trump?

Maybe Trump is Romney's idea of a rich guy that common people can relate to?

Does Barack Obama Actually Want to Be Re-Elected?

The president's lack of enthusiasm jeopardizes his campaign.

3 Reasons Why the Scott Walker Wisconsin Recall Election Matters

Scott Walker is a canary in a coal mine.

The Right's Fixation With 'Vetting' Obama

American voters can use the past four years to judge Obama's qualifications as president

Voters Tuning Out Flood of 2012 Super PAC, Campaign Ads

This will be the year of grassroots voters, not Nielsen families.

Scott Walker's Union Fight Helps Mitt Romney Against Barack Obama

The Wisconsin governor refuses to back down from his opposition to collective bargaining.

Why Is It Only Women Who Need 'Informing' on Reproductive Health?

Men's sexual behavior could also use some "controlling."

advertisement