The GOP’s Next Move

Republicans should not veer hard to the right in response to Barack Obama's victory

November 18, 2008 RSS Feed Print

David Brooks, a thinking person's conservative, has delivered a strong message to the Republican Party: Prepare for more losses at the polls if there is no attempt to broaden the base.

Writing on the New York Times op-ed page, Brooks says reformers with "new structures and new ideas" will eventually emerge but only after more defeats. Some on the right howled, naturally.

The GOP seems to be listening more these days to the likes of Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity, hardly political theorists (and not so hot as entertainers either). They thrive on being outrageous in their blatherings on radio and TV (Fox, of course).

Within hours of President-elect Obama's choice of Rep. Rahm Emanuel as White House chief of staff, Limbaugh characterized him as part of the "thug" party operation in Chicago. Emanuel can be a hard-nosed partisan, but Limbaugh should look in the mirror to see a real thug.

Columnist Robert Novak writes that former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, despite personal baggage, may be the new voice of leadership. Gingrich has been critical of some of the party's actions.

But talk about baggage! Gingrich cheated on two wives, one while he was calling for Bill Clinton's impeachment for his extramarital dalliances. Besides, Gingrich may be a man of many ideas, but a lot of them are wrong.

Gov. Sarah Palin of Alaska is talked up as another choice to lead the party out of the darkness. If that happens, Democrats everywhere should rejoice.

Palin has demonstrated in a few short months after being lifted from obscurity by John McCain that she is not ready for prime time. Some Republicans may find her personally attractive, but her idea of change is a surge further to the right.

The GOP leaders in Congress, Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky and Rep. John Boehner of Ohio, must play to the right in the party ranks if they hope to stay in their respective positions. The word "moderate" is barely heard over the din of rigid conservatism in both houses of Congress. Two Republican incumbents who actually won this month—Sens. Lamar Alexander of Tennessee and Susan Collins of Maine—warned against any move to the right.

John McCain now returns to the Senate, where he will most likely regain his bearings and be a maverick and even a moderate on a few issues. But his days are over as leader of the party. He deserved better from the Republican voters who, as exit polls on November 4 demonstrated, stayed at home.

The next leader of the GOP is likely to come from the ranks of governors who met last week in Miami.

For example, Mitch Daniels of Indiana, a sensible Republican governor, won re-election by a landslide while Obama carried the bright red state. Gov. Charlie Crist of Florida even has many Democrats hailing his handling of affairs there. Gov. Bobby Jindal of Louisiana is a young man who could attract those 18-to-30-year-old voters who went for Obama in droves.

But there will be no tomorrow for the party if it continues to follow the rants of the Limbaughs or the Hannitys of the world. Where is the leader who is willing to stand up to them and their ilk and tell them to get lost?

  • Click here to read more by John W. Mashek.
  • Click here to read more about Republicans.
  • Click here to read more about conservatives.
Tags:
Rush Limbaugh,
Barack Obama,
Sarah Palin,
republican party

Reader Comments Read all comments (16)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

The GOP and Conservatism need only look to three guiding principles; Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.

Tom of TX 10:40AM November 25, 2008

Here they go again.

Republicans always claim during campaigns to be all about helping "Joe the plumber". Once the election's over they go right back to serving only the wealthiest one percent. Republicans eagerly bailed out the Citigroup people who took our money then laid off 75,000 'Joe the bank tellers" and "Joann the secretaries". Now the "Joe the auto factory worker" needs a bailout, Republicans are the "party of NO". They openly scoff at the idea of helping union laborers who they claim are overpaid. The current Republican administration gave Goldman Sachs $10 billion, then Goldman handed out $6.5 billion in bonuses. But Republicans focused attention on what kind of jet the beggars from Detroit flew to Washington in. Millions of real people who work hard and unlike "Joe the plumber" pay our taxes, are really hurting. What we don't need is for Republicans to block the bailout of these workers merely for the sake of opposing Democrats and further to deny help to workers that largely tend to vote Democratic. What Americans don't need is for Republicans to cause millions of autoworkers to be fired, so the taxpayers support them with unemployment, welfare and more. At least if they have jobs, their taxes will help us pay for their lousy bailout.

Derek Jacobs of IN 8:10PM November 23, 2008

I'm all for letting the GOP do it's thing. Anyone who actually believe the garbage-spewers on FOX need to learn some lessons about life and critical thinking.

Go ahead and take the party back to the far right, which is waaayyy more right than it was 40 years ago and waaayyy more inclusive than it was 40 years ago. Go ahead, and let's see how you do in the rest of "real America".

I'm one of those who has voted straight GOP since my first election in 1968. I didn't this election, though, and will not as long as the neander-cons have any influence.

I don't buy into everything from the far left either, but at least they are not calling me anti-American for not agreeing with them, and they are not defining morality for me.

Al of AZ 5:43PM November 21, 2008

advertisement

Debate Club

Was 2011 One of the Worst Years for the U.S. Government in American History?

Experts debate where 2011 ranks among Washington's worst years.

Latest Video

Thomas Jefferson Street Blog

It's Too Early to Write Off Either Rick Santorum or Mitt Romney

Barack Obama and John McCain traveled unlikely paths to their nominations in 2008.

On Contraception Mandate, Obama Blunders Into the Culture Wars

Obama's contraception "compromise" is a gimmick that voters will see right through.

Why Mitt Romney Can't Sell Himself to Conservatives

Voters want to know if they can trust Mitt Romney.

Americans Deserve Political Freedom from the Catholic Church

Church leaders could not have been less gracious towards Obama's surrender on contraception.

What the Catholic Contraceptive Debate Is Really About

Today's debates about contraception and inequality are intertwined in that the bring up the question of morality.

Why the Catholic Contraception Controversy Is a Phony Battle

The Catholic Church is asking the Obama administration to do something it cannot do itself: limit birth control use.

Obama’s Contraceptive 'Compromise' Doesn't Pass the Smell Test

The so-called "accommodation" on contraceptive coverage reinforces the administration's commitment to its pro-choice agenda.

On Women in Combat, Rick Santorum Insults Military Men

To suggest that the men in our armed forces cannot control their emotions is a real slap at the professionals who wear the uniform.

advertisement