• Comment (7)

Don't Discourage Girls from Soccer to 'Protect' Them

May 10, 2012 RSS Feed Print

MSNBC has done a terrific story on the problem of concussions for school-age female soccer players. Girls, the experts the network interviewed, are particularly vulnerable to concussions, second only to football players in terms of risk.

But what's disappointing is the questions the reporters raised to the players and their parents: Why take the risk? Why continue to play the game?

[Slide Show: When Sports and Politics Collide.]

We're not talking about skydiving here, or drag racing. This is a sport. It is a contact sport. Girls and women are more than capable of playing competitive, contact sports. The rules of the game, as well as the equipment used, should be designed to protect the players (male or female) against concussions and other damaging injuries. But why even suggest that the girls just give up soccer?

Yes, it's true that the whole soccer culture has gotten a little out of control, with parents getting as involved in the play as their child athletes. Team sports for kids are supposed to be for the kids, not the parents. Many of us have been at student games and wanted to toss out parents who are screaming or backseat coaching from the stands. But the answer to that problem, as well as the concussion problem, is not to discourage girls from soccer or other competitive sports.

Title IX, which forced schools to achieve parity in sports offered for males and females, has had a tremendous impact for the positive on the girls and women. Females who participate in competitive sports are more confident. They see their bodies as instruments of athletics and not just as something to dress up. They learn (we hope, unless they have bad parents) to win gracefully and to lose gracefully. They learn that competition is not just for boys and men, and that makes the females more ready to compete in the work world later on.

[Scott Galupo: Coaching Kids in an Age of Coddling and Overcompetitiveness]

We should be long past the era when we accepted injuries—even the occasional devastating one—among male football and hockey players, but couldn't imagine it among female athletes. It's the same mindset that had people for so long unable to accept the idea of women in combat. Women now do fight and die in wars, and those deaths are tragic, too. But that doesn't stop the nation from going to war.

So why discourage girls or anyone else from soccer—especially when childhood obesity is such a troubling trend? Make the game safer; make the rules safer, and make the equipment better. Girls might need to be protected from the threat of concussions. But "protecting" them by steering them away from soccer or any other sport makes them weaker in the long term.

Tags:
children's health,
sports,
injuries,
children

Reader Comments Read all comments (7)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

brucetee

What sport did you play ? It took your logic:

In “Ted Nugent, Hilary Rosen Sheltering Obama from Scrutiny” you wrote “In fact average workers during that period,lost ground, due to stagnant wage increases,and reduced purchasing power". Did not find proof of that in your two links. Prehaps you can quote as I do... For sure, your earlier quote “the economic growth,of which he speakes, benefited, by a wide margin,those on the upper rungs of the income ladder. very little ,if any, trickled down to the folks on main st” __ is NOT substantiated __ ... What he spoke has nothing to do with your two articles...

In the first link it says “Experts point to some of the usual suspects -- like technology and globalization -- to explain the widening gap between the haves and have-nots”

Also says “One major pull on the working man was the decline of unions and other labor protections, said Bill Rodgers, a former chief economist for the Labor Department, now a professor at Rutgers University”

Also says “International competition is another factor. While globalization has lifted millions out of poverty in developing nations, it hasn't exactly been a win for middle class workers in the U.S.”

Also says “While average folks were losing ground in the economy, the wealthiest were capitalizing on some of those same factors, and driving an even bigger wedge between themselves and the rest of America”

http://money.cnn.com/2011/02/16/news/economy/middle_class/index.htm

YOUR SECOND ARTICLE SAID ___ Second says “The latest census data depict a middle class that's shrinking as unemployment stays high and the government's safety net frays. The new numbers follow years of stagnating wages for the middle class that have hurt millions of workers and families

http://www.newsobserver.com/2011/12/16/1713834/census-1-in-2-americans-are-poor.html#storylink=cpy”

YOU WROTE __ Don’t see how this, as you wrote, “In fact average workers during that period,lost ground, due to stagnant wage increases,and reduced purchasing power" MATCH UP as proof.

__

As I have quoted before (Reason for recession and high unemployment. Nothing to do with tax cuts for rich):

"It’s important to keep in mind that the recession had nothing to do with the tax cuts. The recession was brought on by destructive federal intervention in the subprime mortgage market, irresponsible funding and securitization of subprime loans by Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, unsound Federal Reserve monetary policy, a lack of oversight by the Securities and Exchange Commission, greed and fraud committed by certain large banks and investment firms, and consumers who bought homes they really couldn’t afford."

http://www.mtgriffith.com/web_documents/taxcutfacts.htm

Bill Hedges of MO 11:39PM May 11, 2012

Just maybe that explains the mental state of michele Bachmann and Sarah Palin.they got beaned in the head too many times playing soccer.

bruce b of NV 11:06PM May 11, 2012

Uh.... Agent Duke

The point was not that we should prohibit sports or driving, but rather that we should access "real risk" / cost ratios - applying common sense is key. Far more American children die choking on grapes and hot dogs EVERY year than have EVER died from lead paint, pesticides, or because schools or libraries weren't up to the ever more onerous and expensive safety regulations.

We tend to overlook the obvious threats and focus on the politically correct minutia or "worry du jour".

R.L. Schaefer of CA 11:01AM May 11, 2012

Susan Milligan

Susan Milligan

Susan Milligan is a political and foreign affairs writer and contributed to a biography of the late Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, "Last Lion: The Fall and Rise of Ted Kennedy." Follow her on Twitter @MilliganSusan.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement