• Comment (6)

Tea Party Head Right About Duty to Vote

April 10, 2012 RSS Feed Print

Kudos to the Tea Party Nation for living up to the truly democratic ideals of this country. And that doesn't mean lower taxes for the wealthiest, or no taxes at all, or bringing the world to the brink of global fiscal meltdown by playing games with the debt ceiling. It's because the Tea Party Nation's Judson Phillips gave exactly the right answer when he was asked how he could imagine voting for Mitt Romney, despite the discontent toward the former Massachusetts governor Phillips has vocalized in the past.

Appearing on the Martin Bashir show on MSNBC, Phillips was asked how he felt about the financial troubles of his favored candidate, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich—not so good, it seemed. And then he was asked if he would support Romney anyway, since Romney appeared to be headed toward the nomination.

[Read the U.S. News debate: Can Mitt Romney Close the Deal With Conservatives?]

Phillips answered the way many Americans in our two-party system would have answered: Sure, I'll vote for the guy, even though I'm not crazy about him, because I really, really don't want the other guy in office any longer.

Bashir was appalled, suggesting Phillips was belying his own convictions. "If you were being true to what you were saying, you wouldn't vote for Mitt Romney," Bashir said. When Phillips began to explain he would end up voting for what he saw as the lesser of two evils, Bashir interjected. "Why not just abstain from the election?" he demanded.

[See a collection of political cartoons on Mitt Romney.]

Phillips appeared appropriately offended by the suggestion. "There are too many people who gave their lives to give me the right to vote. I'm not simply going to sit an election out," Phillips said.

How is not voting a true choice? It's a cop-out, a way of avoiding any kind of responsibility for what happens to the country by saying, "I didn't vote for so-and-so." So don't vote for him or her. You don't have to vote for the other major party candidate, either. You can write someone in you prefer. You can write in Mickey Mouse if you want. And if you think write-ins are a cop-out, take a look at the last Alaska Senate race, in which Sen. Lisa Murkowski refused to be driven from the race just because Tea Party movement voters nominated someone else on the GOP line. She ran as a write-in, and she won.

[See pictures of the 2012 GOP candidates.]

The turnout in many of the presidential primaries has been abysmal. In the District of Columbia, which has seen an embarrassing display of bad behavior by local officials, voters still didn't make their feelings known at the ballot box. Those who didn't show up have no right to complain if and when things deteriorate in the nation's capital.

Many Americans laud voting as a hard-fought right, and it is. But it's also a responsibility. And Phillips is right—we shouldn't dishonor those who fought for this right by refusing to exercise it.

Tags:
Lisa Murkowski,
Tea Party,
2012 presidential election,
Mitt Romney

Reader Comments Read all comments (6)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

To Bill Hedges of Mo, neo conservative politics is on it's way out in America. The people won't support pre emptive war, nor will the people accept government officials who work against civil liberties. Will Mitt Romney be Worse on civil liberties than Barack Obama? Will he be more violent with pre emptive assaults on other countries than Barack Obama? He's likely to be worse. On the economy, Mitt Romney is on a better track then Barack Obama, no doubt... but even better than Mitt Romney's economic plan, is Ron Paul's economics.... by Far.

My vote won't go to Barack Obama under any circumstances and it won't go to any of the neo-conservative Republicans either.

The Republican Party can take up the cause of domestic liberty and international non aggression...... or it fades to nothing. Better to register Libertarian and get on with the future.. don't you think? No...... you don't ;)

No one but Paul 2012~

John of NY 7:16AM April 11, 2012

phil of TN

So you will vote for even more liberal candidates because Republican candidate is too liberal for your taste ? Very few candidatesmatch all my beliefs. Very few liberal ones come close.

You sound like you ARE A LIBERAL playing games...

Bill Hedges of MO 3:33AM April 11, 2012

Sorry my duty is to my principles first - Romney if offensive to my principles because he promoted and defended abortion and gay marriage among tons of other liberal ideas - so as with McCain I will not vote for the forced GOP candidate of Mitt Romney ---- and I'm pissed with it because a bunch of old GOP elite thugs will now give obama 4 more years

phil of TN 5:10PM April 10, 2012

Susan Milligan

Susan Milligan

Susan Milligan is a political and foreign affairs writer and contributed to a biography of the late Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, "Last Lion: The Fall and Rise of Ted Kennedy." Follow her on Twitter @MilliganSusan.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

JFK's Virtuoso Turn at the Bully Pulpit

Kennedy presented a radical idea: Peaceful coexistence.

Mary Kate Cary

Calling Terrorism What It Is

Refusing to call terrorism by its name helps no one.

Latest Videos

advertisement