• Comment (12)

Why Santorum, Gingrich, and Paul Aren't Dropping Out

March 8, 2012 RSS Feed Print

Former Gov. Mitt Romney doesn't understand why his opponents just won't give up the fight for the nomination. He's right in that it's not exactly logical for former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, former Sen. Rick Santorum, and Rep. Ron Paul to stay in the race. It's virtually impossible for any of the lagging three candidates to win the nomination mathematically. Romney stepped aside in 2008 when it was clear that he would not make it to the nomination. He's waited his turn; he believe he's earned it, and he can't figure out why the less popular candidates just won't go away and let him get down to the business of defeating President Barack Obama.

[See a collection of political cartoons on the 2012 GOP hopefuls.]

The answer is partly a function of basic delusion. When one has amassed the emotional energy and ego required to run for president, it's understandable that the candidates might imagine they could still get the nod. Romney is well ahead in delegates and is almost certain to have acquired a greater number of delegates by the time of the convention. However, it's not certain that Romney will have an out-and-out majority of delegates by the time the convention comes around, giving lower-performing candidates some hope that convention delegates will pick them on a second or third or even fourth ballot.

The fact that Romney may well not win a straight-up majority of delegates before the convention is also a sign of how divided the Republican party is right now. Social conservatives and Tea Party activists are not happy with the man they see as (despite his recent campaign rhetoric) too moderate. And establishment types in the party know that a one-time moderate like Romney probably has a better chance of beating Obama in a general election. It may be a heart-versus-brain competition, and neither metaphorical organ wants to give in.

[Read the U.S. News debate: Can Mitt Romney Close the Deal With Conservatives?]

Money, too, is playing a big role—whether it's the Super PACs or simply the modern technology of fund-raising. In days past, presidential primaries resolved the nomination earlier not because voters had coalesced around a particular contender, but because some of them had simply run out of money. When a candidate can raise many millions of dollars in a day on the Internet, the money barrier is lower. And if a candidate has a wealthy sugar daddy funding Super PAC ads, the high cost of advertising is greatly diminished. Campaigns, then, can go on a  lot longer, which forces the contenders to continue answering questions and addressing issues raised by his or her foes.

The modern scenario is understandably frustrating to Romney. But it's not necessarily bad for democracy. Party stalwarts may want to sew up the nomination, but voters deserve choice.

Tags:
Rick Santorum,
Ron Paul,
2012 presidential election,
Newt Gingrich,
Mitt Romney

Reader Comments Read all comments (12)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I'll say this - Ron Paul believes what he's saying and is pretty true to it. There's a message that obviously resonates with a small but fervent group. I personally am not a supporter and we all (except maybe a couple people here) know that he has zero chance to win the nomination, but if you believe in his cause by all means spread your message. However, you have to agree that his obvious pact with Romney not to attack Romney in the debates, and instead to focus on Romney's chief competitor at that time, is a clear indication that Paul knows he cannot win. It also is kind of selling out, since Romney is very far from a libertarian.

The fact is, the libertarian movement has too many things that are hated by the mainstream in both parties (cutting social welfare not acceptable on the left, failure to declare war on Iran an issue for the right) to be a real force on the national scene in the near future. Whatever anyone says, both parties like big government, it's just a matter of whether they want that government to be focused on supporting their own people with social spending, or destroying other people with defense spending and war.

Rob of NJ 10:57AM March 09, 2012

Romney would have won the hearts of the conservative right earlier if they could get it into their hearts and minds that he is conservative.

They question his heart not so much his genius for tackling hard things and making things successful.

I read this article and it let me see the other side of the man that the "media and friends" won't give us.

http://stallioncornell.com/?p=1449

Wendy73 of OH 10:50AM March 09, 2012

Here's the fun part: no one believes in Mitt Romney or Newt Gingrich or Rick Santorum. Also, the ones that believed in Barack Obama don't anymore.. although many are loath to say so.

Having a Strong minority of the people believe in you - by now - is a good step along the way. Dr. Ron Paul is revered by a citizen army of patriots and by our young people in uniform - although all told, we are not Yet a majority of the people but there are Eight more months until the November elections. Something's happening here. In an evolving and interconnected world where ideas can spread like a wildfire.. the dream is only half visible early on, and we go closer to the light from it step by step.

Revolutions are won or societies transformed in weeks or months or years. The ultimate and peaceful revolution for the literal unenslavement of mankind is underway. To the ramparts then.

~Ron Paul in 2012 ~

John of NY 7:59AM March 09, 2012

Susan Milligan

Susan Milligan

Susan Milligan is a political and foreign affairs writer and contributed to a biography of the late Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, "Last Lion: The Fall and Rise of Ted Kennedy." Follow her on Twitter @MilliganSusan.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Political Enemies: Good vs. Perfect

In politics the perfect is often the enemy of the good.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement