• Comment (8)

Mitt Romney and 'Envy' Versus 'Greed'

January 12, 2012 RSS Feed Print

The 2012 presidential race is shaping up as a battle not just between candidates, but over which of the Seven Deadly Sins is most offensive to voters.

On the one side, we have envy, which GOP front-runner former Gov. Mitt Romney identified as a distasteful by-product of income inequality—or, Republicans argue, the "class warfare" provoked by Democrats. The United States "already has a leader who divides us by the bitter politics of envy," Romney said after winning the New Hampshire primary. The line was obviously meant to undermine Obama's 2008 pledge to bring people together, as well as to cast restless middle-class and poor people as possessing un-mannerly envy.

[Check out political cartoons about the 2012 GOP field.]

On the other side, however, we have greed, and that is a Deadly Sin that may haunt the eventual Republican nominee. The Occupy Wall Street movement may be dismissed (unfairly) by some as a bunch of Starbucks-sucking, whiny kids who won't look for jobs, but it is undeniably true that a broad swath of Americans is getting more than a little resentful at the fact that the very wealthy have come through the recession quite profitably, while the low-and-middle income workers are still struggling. Many of those who managed to keep their jobs are working at lower pay and reduced benefits, further aggravating the situation.

[See pictures of Occupy Wall Street protests.]

According to a recent Pew Research Center poll, about two-thirds of the public now believes there are strong conflicts between the rich and poor. The percentage has grown by 19 points since 2009, suggesting that voters are growing far more aware of the economic division as the election approaches. The Pew report notes, even more notably:

…in the public's evaluations of divisions within American society, conflicts between rich and poor now rank ahead of three other potential sources of group tension -- between immigrants and the native born; between blacks and whites; and between young and old. Back in 2009, more survey respondents said there were strong conflicts between immigrants and the native born than said the same about the rich and the poor.

How much political capital can a candidate gain by dismissing the unemployed malcontents as immorally envious? It's a risk, especially this year.

[Read about 7 groups with reason to protest.]

We all feel envious sometimes, and most of us are not proud of it (which is a good thing, since pride is another one of the Seven Deadly Sins). But that sort of envy comes from feeling ungraciously jealous when a friend gets a promotion or a new car or a charming boyfriend. Feeling resentful of Wall Street investors and bankers who made terrible economic decisions that affected the entire national economy—then continued to be extremely well compensated despite the failures—is not jealousy. It's a reaction to what many Americans see as a basic question of fairness.

Americans are aspirational; this is why even those who will never in their lives amass $1 million still oppose the estate tax. And there is a strong sense in this country, among liberals and conservatives alike, that enterprise and creativity should be rewarded, financially and otherwise. What gets missed in the silly verbal jousting, in which President Obama has been declared a "socialist" and enemy of free enterprise, is that Wall Street itself wasn't willing to submit to the uncertainty of capitalism. They wanted to privatize the profits. But they wanted to socialize the risk. And it was 401K holders and middle-class workers who bore the brunt of that bad risk.

[Read the U.S. News debate: Is Occupy Wall Street the Next Tea Party?]

There was a time when Americans could chuckle good-naturedly at the line in the movie Wall Street that "Greed is good," and even agree with it, somewhat. But that was when envy was about who had the bigger car. The enviers now are the ones who have no health insurance and are losing their houses to foreclosure. And they vote.

 

Tags:
Wall Street,
Occupy Wall Street,
politics,
economy,
2012 presidential election

Reader Comments Read all comments (8)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

BEEP, BEEP, BEEP!!!

When Get Off My Damn Obama Lawn lefty dem shills like Susan Milligan try to work Christian theological concepts into their shilling, you can most-clearly hear the beep-beep-beep of their BS dump trucks backing up to you.

The bailouts. Particularly as those evolved to include Goldman Sachs and AIG. That's what made most reasonable people first question why federal taxpayer money went to covering the self-serving mistakes made by those whose occupations are far beyond butcher, baker, and candlestick maker.

That started with Bushobama and TARP. Then Bushobama II got the ball rolling even faster with the Mar. 2009 mega-wazoo $787 billion stimulus.

And the major sidelight story to that was while Bushobama II was in the process of tripling troops to Afghanistan, bin Laden was sitting pretty in Abbottabad Pakistan.

So as the greed/envy storyline goes, republicans wanted to raid the Public Till for the Manhattanite rich bastards. Then the democrats wanted to raid the Public Till for non-rich bastards that live in our economic zipcodes. To make up for republicans raiding the Public Till for the rich bastards. Even though the democrats were as complicit as the republicans in raiding the Public Till for the rich bastards in the first place. So both republicans and democrats alike could cover their behinds for both pushing mortage loans to people who couldn't really afford such, even in the best of economic times. Then securitizing such questionable loans and releasing them into the Main St. wild where they inevitably imploded. As forewarned of many years ago by Paul Volker. And Ron Paul.

Is that envy, to question why on earth bad loans were pushed then securitized to where the CYA federal bailouts for both rich and non-rich bastards then occurred? No. It isn't.

This from Desperately Seeking Relevance Susan really pegs the hubris needle:

"Americans are aspirational; this is why even those who will never in their lives amass $1 million still oppose the estate tax."

All the pseudo chrome plating on that lefty tax-the-rich canard wore off a long time ago.

A decidely-less hubristic sentiment is that those whose heirs will never be troubled by the estate tax believe in one standard of conduct for everyone. And one standard of treatment for everyone. Particularly as it relates to redistribution of federal tax money.

No one's livelihood should be bailed out by federal tax money. From public school teacher to investment banker to CDS bookie to narco-kleptocrat Hamid Karzai.

And no one's inheritance should be partly confiscated by a third party, especially when that third party has proven to be such a fiscal spendthrift.

Raider of the Public Till Bushobama II has been the snarkiest, most envy-promoting president in modern history. As a consequence of Bushobama and Bushobama II and an ineffectual Congress unable to date to rein both in -- even on something so blatant as Bushobama II's non-war Libyan war -- once again we are back to square one.

They -- Bushobama II and Congress -- both want to raise the debt ceiling. Again.

Ron Paul, 2012. Only envy of others with concomittant greed for yourself stands in your way of recognizing Paul as the candidate of real and positive change. What 2008 Obama was supposed to be in terms of real hope and change is actually 2012 Paul.

Outside of any political context, the short route to overcoming any sort of envy or greed is simply to be more grateful for what you do have. Gratitude clears the mind -- and body -- of many ills.

--------

PS: As Susan Milligan mentioned previously that she was a Buffalo resident, here's something for her to read in terms of how reasonableness -- not envy or greed -- informs many on the workings of Bushobama and Bushobama II -- and their predecessors. And their wannabe successors:

"How Stimulus Spending Ruined Buffalo

Four decades of subsidies and high taxes haven't arrested the city's decline, but here comes New York's governor with another billion dollars."

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204409004577156603296740624.html

dom youngross of OH 1:03PM January 15, 2012

The country is going have to face the health care problem. Giving money to insurance companies is not going to solve it. Right now we are falling behind Cuba based on rating.

Doctors are somewhat overpaid compared to other countries. But it is likely there is going to be a shortage with the Obama new plan. It takes time to create a doctor and likely this will show up. The other problem is cost of education. It is not likely medical school or for that matter college is free. This is not europe.

Than there is the problem that the practise of herbal medicine is mostly illegal in the United States as the power of the drug companies do not want competition. Since the government creates a situation of lack of research of herbs and the fact everything has to be approved by FDA which creates a cost of drug approved averaging 800 million dollars, how could any herb be approved. We practise rich person medicine which 80 percent of the world could not. So we pay more for health care than anyone else.

Now we have to cut back on entitlements which is medicine. The question is have you earned your air today?

Arthur Gittleman of AR 2:15PM January 13, 2012

with all this political in fighting going on among the republican wannbee's,for the party's nomination.the one common thread that ties them together is there pseudo comments on wanting to help the lower and middle classes.

bruce b of NV 12:15PM January 13, 2012

Susan Milligan

Susan Milligan

Susan Milligan is a political and foreign affairs writer and contributed to a biography of the late Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, "Last Lion: The Fall and Rise of Ted Kennedy." Follow her on Twitter @MilliganSusan.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

JFK's Virtuoso Turn at the Bully Pulpit

Kennedy presented a radical idea: Peaceful coexistence.

Mary Kate Cary

A Democracy in Crisis

Can the country long survive an ever-growing government?

Latest Videos

advertisement