• Comment (13)

2012 Republicans Risk Repeating John Kerry's 2004 Mistakes

December 29, 2011 RSS Feed Print

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich thinks former Gov. Mitt Romney is not a true conservative. Romney compared Gingrich to the character of Lucy Ricardo in her iconic performance as an assembly-line worker in a candy factory (great episode; bizarre comparison) and says Gingrich is guilty of his own flip-flops on healthcare. Rep. Ron Paul has come under attack for old newsletters that contain racist, anti-Semitic, and homophobic content. And all of the members of the GOP field decree President Obama is a hapless, barely-competent politician who knows nothing about the economy.

It's clear what the Republicans are against and what and whom they don't like. But while that approach may galvanize the base, it might not win an election.

[Check out 2011: The Year in Cartoons.]

Democrats in 2004 thought there was so much dislike of former President George W. Bush that their candidate would win almost by default. But Sen. John Kerry lost, in no small part because he didn't give voters a clear and optimistic vision of where he would take the country. True, a lot of people disliked Bush. But not enough of them really liked Kerry—at least not enough to make the extra push in a close election. The opposing party in any election often proclaims that a presidential contest is a referendum on the current occupant of the White House. Had that been true, Kerry would have beaten Bush, who had low approval ratings and was facing increasing voter unhappiness over the war in Iraq.

The current Republican field faces the same barrier in taking on Obama. The president is surely vulnerable, and the election—at least at this point—is shaping up as another close contest. But the eventual nominee is going to have to come up with a stronger argument than "Obama has failed, and I'm not him." Republicans may not like Obama's policies, but the president is nowhere near as polarizing as Gingrich (and is better liked, even if the president's professional approval ratings are not good). Paul claims a loyal cult following, but his appeal does not stretch far beyond that group of libertarians. And Romney faces similar problems that beleaguered previous losing candidates. Like 2008 GOP nominee Sen. John McCain, Romney has a problem with his conservative base. Unlike McCain, Romney is not a war hero and does not connect well with people in a town hall meeting. Like Kerry, Romney has a solid resume in government. Unlike Kerry, Romney does not have foreign policy experience. And so far, Romney is failing to capture the enthusiasm among his own party members to oust even an unpopular president.

[See a collection of political cartoons on Mitt Romney.]

The overall anti-incumbent mood could make the difference for Romney or any other GOP nominee. And if the economy worsens or stays at its current, sluggish state, that may be enough for voters to demand a change. But even in adversity, Americans are an optimistic, forward-looking lot. Criticizing the competition may get a candidate attention. But to get votes, at some point, they're going to have to present a positive message and vision.

Tags:
John Kerry,
politics,
Ron Paul,
2012 presidential election,
Newt Gingrich,
Obama administration,
Mitt Romney,
Republican Party

Reader Comments Read all comments (13)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

dom youngross of OH

Paul accomplished next to nothing in D.C.. He didn't get his message into law. His best chance may be Iowa, after that WHAT ???

You take his anti involvement in foreign issues as big +++. Why is his National polls SO BAD ???

Bill Hedges of MO 9:16PM January 02, 2012

HOW THOUGHTFUL!!!

The way Susan Milligan is always looking out for BOTH the republican and democrat parties.

Well, the dwindling war-racketeering contituencies of both that is.

Particularly with her continuing and unresolved inner Get Off My Damn Obama Lawn opining conflict, as evidenced by:

"Paul claims a loyal cult following, but his appeal does not stretch far beyond that group of libertarians."

That's something only a war-whore, -slut, or -racketeer of any political persuasion would say.

Non war-whoring, -slutting, and -racketeering progressives and liberals in particular are pecking out of their peer-pressure shells to compare Rep. Paul and President Obama, and favourably so for Paul:

http://www.salon.com/2011/12/31/progressives_and_the_ron_paul_fallacies/singleton/

If Susan Milligan wasn't such a Black Swan* war-whore for Obama by opining occupation, she'd be decrying the libprog peer-pressure that tries to keep liberals and progressives on the Obama war-racketeering rez. And she would champion instead pieces by first-tier writers such as Glenn Greenwald for braving the first-step off that rez.

War-racketeering is the big one. It is the whore/slut mother of all things Big Bad Corp and TBTF.

If war-racketeering actually worked, to where our economy was constantly in the up direction -- and so many of our bodies weren't flown back to Dover, and so many more of theirs were left on the killing fields abroad for a hurried burial -- no one outside of theologians could argue against such.

But it doesn't work. For us or them. And Paul is forcing the still-unwilling to face up to it. That's his "positive message and vision" -- for those of us tired of dancing straw in the brick-making mud pit of war-racketeering that is. And tired of all those like Susan Milligan who say, "Dance you mud hens, work that stray in!"

Ron Paul, 2012. For all those not at the top of the war-racketeering food chain but down here in it's mud pit. And that would include you too Susan Milligan. You're no better than the rest of us.

--------

*Black Swan -- Great psyco-sexual thriller movie about inner conflict.

dom youngross of OH 7:10PM January 02, 2012

brucetee

I explained it a zillion times. You're too stupid or liberal to understand. Courts cleared him. Don't seem to have anyone else who continues this losing argument but you.

Is on the records. SO WHAT. All but classroom issues was dropped. Courts agreed with Newt on classes he taught.

Take you argument to another. Had enough of you ignorance. Try junior, Hunter, or John Wayne. Anyone else that wants to fool with you about ON THE RECORD. Better yet just don't expect my company. YOU BORE ME.

I Rather write meaningful comments not go over settled issues over, over, over, and over...

Bill Hedges of MO 9:09PM December 30, 2011

Susan Milligan

Susan Milligan

Susan Milligan is a political and foreign affairs writer and contributed to a biography of the late Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, "Last Lion: The Fall and Rise of Ted Kennedy." Follow her on Twitter @MilliganSusan.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

JFK's Virtuoso Turn at the Bully Pulpit

Kennedy presented a radical idea: Peaceful coexistence.

Mary Kate Cary

Calling Terrorism What It Is

Refusing to call terrorism by its name helps no one.

Latest Videos

advertisement