• Comment (6)

Are the Iowa Caucuses, New Hampshire Primary Losing Their Influence?

December 13, 2011 RSS Feed Print

States have fought brutally to hold their nominating contests early in the campaign season. But is the impact of early primaries and caucuses waning?

Iowa, holder of the first presidential caucuses and once a hotbed of political activity, has been relatively quiet this season, the Washington Post's Dan Balz reports in a fascinating and insightful piece. The lack of frenzy is particularly notable because the GOP field is turning out to be far more open than anticipated, and Iowa is a state where an ideological conservative can make a real run against the long-presumed (but perhaps no longer) front-runner, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney.

[Read five reasons why Iowa is the perfect place for the first 2012 contest--and four reasons it isn't.]

Iowa and New Hampshire (which holds the first primary) have jealously guarded their roles as hosts of the first contests in the country, and they have a strong argument to keep those distinctions. Since the media markets are so small, it is virtually impossible to buy an election in either state. Both venues have given a boost to candidates (such as former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee in 2008's GOP race) that the media had largely written off as non-viable. And while voters in other states are understandably annoyed that Iowa and New Hampshire always get to go first (kind of like the Dallas Cowboys always getting to play on Thanksgiving Day, regardless of their record that year), veterans of political campaigns will also note that voters in Iowa and New Hampshire take their roles very seriously. They treat it like jury duty and tend to give a listen to pretty much any candidate who comes through.

[Check out political cartoons about the 2012 GOP hopefuls.]

The states once provided momentum to candidates, but that has been less of a factor since Internet fundraising has allowed candidates to raise a lot of money very quickly—and thus, stay in the race longer. And as the 2008 Democratic primary showed, the later states can be critical in determining the nominees.

If Iowa's power wanes, perhaps candidates will be less skittish about questioning ethanol subsidies. If New Hampshire is no longer king-maker, perhaps candidates will be less worried about refusing to "take the pledge" not to raise taxes. They'll always be important as long as they are first. But they will not necessarily be determinate.

Tags:
Iowa caucus,
politics,
2012 presidential election,
Iowa

Reader Comments Read all comments (6)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

“All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution, are null and void.” -Chief Justice Marshall, Marbury v. Madison.

•One of the nation’s most well known legal precedents, Marbury vs. Madison, decided in 1803, makes clear that any “law” that is “repugnant to the Constitution is null and void.”

NDAA Is A Hoax: You Can’t Legalize Tyranny

http://www.infowars.com/ndaa-is-a-hoax-you-cant-legalize-tyranny/

Police State 2012: No Need to Wait, It’s Already Here (DOCUMENTED facts)

http://www.prisonplanet.com/police-state-2012-no-need-to-wait-it%E2%80%99s-already-here.html

The UNITED STATES Government is the "TERRORIST" (DOCUMENTED FACTS)

http://piratepad.net/ep/pad/view/ro.KALlSDPcGnV/latest

Alex Jones:

http://www.infowars.com/listen-to-the-radio-show-archive/

There is a war on for your "MIND"

http://www.infowars.com/

Gordon Gekko 5:13PM January 05, 2012

I've never been prone to conspiracy theories, and I suppose I'm still not, because this is just too obvious: the media just can't help exposing themselves for the plutocratic shills they really are.

These types of articles are the Plan B measure in the Ron Paul media-blackout. It's not enough anymore to ignore him because he is, and always has been, a truly viable candidate; thus, it's now necessary to downplay -- well in advance, I might add -- the successes he'll reap due to his unyielding patriotism to the ideals our forefathers espoused.

Dr. Paul will win Iowa -- because, as the article says, "the media markets are so small, it is virtually impossible to buy an election -- and then likely go on to win New Hampshire.

I, furthermore, predict that in the same way Iowa is being dismissed, Florida's results will be emphasized, as the Jewish vote there (read people who treat Israel as the 51st state), gives Paul little chance of success.

Also: Yahoo news, the most popular homepage in the U.S. with over 100,000,000 subscribers, has now suspended its comment sections for their news articles. Curious, eh?

Thomas 6:57AM December 15, 2011

BETTER QUESTION...

Are opinion 'writers' losing whatever supposed influence they supposedly used to have?

Yes.

Just look at the lineup of opiners at USN&WR, naught but extremist lefty/righty shills for the status-quo democrats and republicans.

What we learned from Rudy Giuliani last time around was that if you don't get in the game early on you won't get in afterwards.

Ron Paul, 2012. First Iowa. Then New Hampshire.

dom youngross of OH 5:33PM December 14, 2011

Susan Milligan

Susan Milligan

Susan Milligan is a political and foreign affairs writer and contributed to a biography of the late Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, "Last Lion: The Fall and Rise of Ted Kennedy." Follow her on Twitter @MilliganSusan.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement