• Comment (10)

'Failures of Leadership' Is Just Code for Lack of Responsibility

November 30, 2011 RSS Feed Print

Good leadership is often critical to the performance of any sort of team or group. But increasingly, "failure of leadership" has become a buzzword excuse-phrase for simply not doing one's job.

Some students aren't doing well in school. Those of us over 30 would have been dressed down by our parents, and forced to give up social or extramural activities to study more. Now, teachers are blamed for not "reaching" a student who may simply not be ready to learn—either because he or she didn't have breakfast that morning, comes from a household with abuse or where education is not emphasized, or merely has a bad attitude. The fact that it is the educators themselves who are held accountable for students' grades (instead of the students themselves) only emboldens those students who don't want to do the work and spares the parents who can't or won't take some responsibility for their students' educations.

[Read U.S. News Debate Club: Are Teachers Overpaid?]

And the lack of personal responsibility doesn't stop at adulthood. The Washington Capitals have been rather sluggish on the ice, losing games to hockey teams that on paper, at least, the Capitals should beat. Perhaps it's just a bad run. Perhaps some of the players aren't stepping up to earn their hefty salaries. Perhaps some of them have an attitude problem themselves. Alex Ovechkin is a stellar, supremely talented player, for example, but got miffed when his coach, Bruce Boudreau, benched him briefly during a game. Ovechkin probably deserved it (the Caps went on to win the game in question), but what lesson was learned? Boudreau got fired, accused of not "reaching" the players.

And does accountability kick in when someone achieves the distinction of being elected to the House or Senate? Don't count on it. When the so-called super committee failed to reach an agreement on how to reduce the deficit and debt, Republicans immediately blamed President Obama for not showing the "leadership" to force an agreement. That is a remarkable comment from an institution which has been determined, under both Democratic and Republican control, to remind the executive branch of its separate and equal status as a branch of government. But more importantly, the comments display an alarming lack of responsibility. These are members of Congress. They are experienced adults, and most of them are middle-aged. They have college educations, and some of them have law, business, or other advanced degrees. They have smart and hard-working staffs. Can they seriously tell us that they would have found common ground if the president had showed up, finger wagging, and threatened to take away their texting privileges? Or—perhaps more likely—are they disappointed that Obama did not get more directly involved, so they could tie him more closely to their own failure?

[See a collection of political cartoons on the deficit super committee.]

We don't have a leadership crisis. We have a crisis of accountability—and maturity.

Tags:
Congress,
politics,
education policy

Reader Comments Read all comments (10)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

om youngross of OH_ Thanks

I give all credit for the following link to Paul. Is so stated in the article.

You may be aware I am a Newter. Everything nearly Bill C. takes credit for was Newt such as passage of last civil rights bill, shoring up entitlements, balanced budget, and smaller government, and reducing taxes. (that gained more revenue that Bill C. tax increases on rich. Democrats can not admit that). The old “Those who would rather put their hands over their eyes and shout "LA-LA-LA-LA-LA! Can't see you, can't hear you” as you wrote.

You might enjoy my last comment on Jamie's “Obama's America of Low Expectations”. I highly recommend you check it out. It gave me great pleasure writing that comment. Would not be surprised if liberl staff took note. Tell me what you think. You made some great points in your comments. You may become the second or third less like conservative on this site. I hope I am most hated & # 1. Am trying.

Here is link I spoke of:

"Secret Federal Reserve System data released December 1 reveals that the banking cartel (the Fed and its member banks) bailed itself out to the tune of more than $10 tri"Fed Data Reveals Trillions in Bailouts to Big Foreign Banks"llion in “emergency” funds, with trillions more going to line the pockets of big European and foreign banks"

"The $700 billion Wall Street bailout turned out to be pocket change compared to trillions and trillions of dollars in near zero interest loans and other financial arrangements that the Federal Reserve doled out to every major financial institution," said self-described socialist Senator Sanders after learning about the Fed data.”

http://www.thenewamerican.com/economy/sectors-mainmenu-46/5371-fed-data-reveals-trillions-in-bailouts-to-big-foreign-banks

What happens if We are paid back 50 cents on the dollar or worse. Surely we would lose our AA rating if for nothing else for printing ALL THAT MONEY. US$ could lose world use causing major pain.

Bill Hedges of MO 8:50PM November 30, 2011

GOOD WORK BILL HEDGES OF MO...

You're driving them crazy with extensive substantiation of your comments.

Who has a problem with links for further reading? Those who would rather put their hands over their eyes and shout "LA-LA-LA-LA-LA! Can't see you, can't hear you!"

A link-less comment based on observation:

Obama would take the credit for anything, like ending the Iraq war when in reality the Iraqi gov't didn't want our troops there anymore and wouldn't sign off on a new Status of Forces Agreement. So provisions of the old SOFA signed by Bush back in Dec. 2008 took effect, meaning US troops HAVE to be out by 1 Jan. 2012.

Actually, I've made that point before, and supplied the substantiating links.

But just to pissoff those who take offence at links:

The Iraq War Ain’t Over, No Matter What Obama Says

“On January 1, 2012, the State Department will command a hired army of about 5,500 security contractors, all to protect the largest U.S. diplomatic presence anywhere overseas.”

http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2011/10/obama-iraq-eternal/

As one who would take credit for anything and everything, Obama also can take the blame.

In for a credit buck, in for a blame bundle.

But the real lack of leadership Obama showed with the super-duper committee was evidenced by his actions almost three years ago, right out of the block in 2009, starting with the $787 billion mega-wazoo stimulus that was supposed to do this, that, and the other great wonderful things and didn't come close to living up to its White House billing.

The dems in congress were the ones who pulled that fiscal fast one and leaderless Obama just sat back and admired his manicure while they did.

We were on a collision course with fiscal disaster back in 2009. And Obama was asleep at the wheel, purposefully so.

Actually, it was more like Obama was the complicit wheelman for smash-and-grab dems knocking over a trillion dollar liquor store.

His only lame defence is the parallel-universe argument, that in a parallel universe somewhere things would have been worse if Obama didn't do as he did -- stand idly by while the dems in congress raided the public till.

Another lack of presidential leadership shown by Obama was sticking with Karzai in Afghanistan. Starting with the Bonn conference ten years ago which installed Karzai as president, Karzai had more than enough time to reverse the corruption in Afghanistan. But Karzai didn't. And leaderless Obama stuck with Karzai after Karzai's sham election in 2009.

So as a result of leaderless Obama, we'll still be more than knee deep in narco-klepto Afghanistan at least until 2014, when Karzai's term ends.

Here's to dumping Obama in 2012, and ending the Af-Pak debacle -- which can't end well under any president. But can end much sooner rather than later under a Paul presidency.

Paul foresaw and warned of the impending fiscal crisis for years -- and has outlined the now-needed $1 Trillion with a T real spending cuts and department eliminations to reverse the crisis.

That, lefty dem shill Susan Milligan, is what real leadership is all about.

dom youngross of OH 8:16PM November 30, 2011

"No one is interested in stupid links you provide. (And in case you wondered, no one reads the stupid link-ridden post...they see the links...and just MOVE ON TO THE NEXT COMMENT.)"

Maybe that is why there are so many people who keep spouting the same fact-less comments - they are too lazy to educate themselves.

junior of DC 4:08PM November 30, 2011

Susan Milligan

Susan Milligan

Susan Milligan is a political and foreign affairs writer and contributed to a biography of the late Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, "Last Lion: The Fall and Rise of Ted Kennedy." Follow her on Twitter @MilliganSusan.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement