Investigation into Bin Laden Movie Is About 2012

August 16, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (4)

The 2012 campaign is now in full force. And it's not because there have been several GOP primary debates, or that a Republican candidate has already dropped out of the race, or even because President Obama has interrupted his can't-we-all-act-like-adults bit to criticize Congress.

It's because a congressman has called for an investigation into a Hollywood movie.

Kathryn Bigelow and Mark Boal, the director and screenwriter who made the Academy Award-winning film The Hurt Locker, are now at work on a movie about Osama bin Laden. This is not only understandable but predictable. Hollywood is in business to make money, and while Bigelow and Boal are surely many levels above the filmmakers who produce movies with men acting like frat boys and grown women paralyzed by inexplicable insecurity, this movie will certainly draw a crowd. But what House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Peter King worries about is that the Obama administration is providing the filmmakers with classified information to help them make the film.

White House spokesman Jay Carney dismissed the concerns as "ridiculous," and while we can't know for sure, it does seem a little silly. The military operation itself required intense secrecy and protection of classified information to be successful. Why release classified information now? And why would the filmmakers need classified information? We know how it started, and we know how it ended—with bin Laden shot by a U.S. Navy SEAL. That's a pretty good movie right there, and one Americans exhausted by the toll of two wars and a recession will likely flock to see. [See a collection of political cartoons on airport security.]

The real question here is not whether classified information is being given to Hollywood, but whether King's genuine concern is timing. The movie is set to be released before the 2012 elections, arguably giving the embattled president a public relations boost right when he may need one. But does a movie make the difference? It's unthinkable that the Obama campaign will not remind people of the huge military success of killing the most hated man in America; they don't need Hollywood to do it. There may well be many films whose sourcing and facts are suspect—those would be the mockumentaries undoubtedly being created under the loose campaign finance rules in place since the Citizens United case was decided by the U.S. Supreme Court. Now, that's something worth a congressional investigation.

Tags:
Congress,
Department of Homeland Security,
Osama bin Laden,
2012 presidential election,
Obama administration,
Barack Obama,
Republican Party

Reader Comments Read all comments (4)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

You're totally missing the point! Duh. Kathryn Bigelow and her co-IP thief Mark Boal smugly bragged about having acquired "Classified information" BEFORE Bin Laden was killed. They did this as a publicity move -- making money off all the sheep in this country -- by stealing information **AS WELL AS STORYLINE**. They're the ones who should be investigated for stealing informationas well as Copyrighted material as Boal tends to do. Why were they "rushing to Len the script" this past winter, then lied to the Government? This has nothing to do with Pres. Obama and the White House. It has to do with committing theft and Treason. Look deeper and you'll see they don't care about you, their audience, or your safety. They just want your money by any shock value means they can use. Bottom line, they committed treason. Leave Obama out of it.

Clayton of NY 12:22PM August 17, 2011

What ever happened to people having patriotism and respect for our military like these real heroes, Seal Team 6, that took out Bin Ladin. Bigelow and Boal had started this movie before the victorious kill of our public enemy number one. What a storyline for a movie it turned out to be, these two movie makers were on the right idea before it turned into a jackpot.

Get out of the way of a couple entrepreneurial movie makers who could make a blockbuster movie and a patriotic one, too. That it happens during an election years will make it a bigger hit. So what if the president played a role in getting Bin Ladin. The US military goes out of its way to make all sorts of pro-war movies. Its nothing new for our military to support blockbuster movies, look at the transformer movies. The military probably makes a profit by renting out the hardware so let's not interfere with what is regular fare.

Last I recall we take pride in our government successes, our military's victories and truly patriotic moments in history that need to be told, retold, be the subject of books and movies and ingrained into history. This is essentially the end of al-qaida, what this country has invested trillions of treasury and blood. We deserve to see a victory rung up the flag pole and celebrated. Seal Team 6 deserves plenty of recognition its not getting enough of. What, do some want to wait for another couple years to recognize Seal Team 6 as heroes? Especially after so many other members of Seal Team 6 who died in a helicopter crash recently. We can't wait to celebrate our heroes. We celebrate our heroes in real time.

We are still at war and its only American to rote for our troops and cheer when we are winning the war for a change.

Pooh on the sour grapes who can't stand Obama accomplishing what Bush never could accomplish. Its not political, its patriotic to recognize our wins. There the same crowd who never gave Roosevelt credit for winning WWII or pulling the country out of the Great Recession. They don't want Obama to get credit for killing Bin Ladin either. Tough. Watch for these same whiners when Gaddafi goes down here pretty soon.

janie of OH 8:08PM August 16, 2011

First time I heard that was from Hugh Hefner, on some late-night talk show years and years ago, might have been Tom Snyder. At the time I wondered how Hefner could say that.

Not no more.

Look how censorship-conflicted Susan Milligan is. Just her other opinion post she tells Cameron not to shut down facebook or twitter. But here in the US she has a problem with anyone pursuing their free speech as upheld by Citizens United, which itself was the result of people trying to pull the censor plug on the unflattering Hillary the Movie.

It might turn out that someone will release an unflattering portrait of the republican running against Obama going into the 2012 election, as a result of free speech as upheld by the very-same Citizens United. But Susan Milligan apparently is not willing to take any chance whatsoever that Obama might not be re-elected, hence her frequent axe-grinding over Citizens United.

------

PS: Something for both Susan Milligan and David Plouffe to consider: A rah-rah war movie going into the 2012 election may not do much in terms of giving Obama a bump -- war fatigue. If anything a got-bin-Laden movie going into the 2012 election may more so remind everyone of this: Why in the H-E-L-L are we still there? We got the bad guy A YEAR AND A HALF AGO already. And the best Obama can do is still drawdown only half of the number of troops he escalated to Af-Pak? Even AFTER bin Laden got popped?

Here's another Susan Milligan censorship conflict: When college-age kids were whooping it up right after bin Laden got popped she criticized such as the self-appointed excessive-celebration police comish. Now, it seems she's hoping for some upcoming excessive celebration over a movie reminder that bin Laden getting popped -- if such will give Obama a bump going into the 2012 election.

-----

PPS: It's no conspiracy theory to assume that the White House would like any movie about bin Laden getting popped be told in a way the White House thinks most appropriate -- for both their immediate concerns and the way they would like the history books to be written. Think the White House would be pleased with any movie that varied from the official story to date, even if clearly billed as a fictional account? I don't think they would be pleased.

With that reasonable assumption I would expect the White House to be a bit more... 'cooperative' than normal with any film maker willing to tell the story from the White House's desired perspective and purpose, particularly in hammering home the official story to date. Whether that rises to the actual case of the White House comprimising classified information -- one would assuredly hope NOT. But with King pressing concern over that possibility, it does say to Obama and the White House: "Hey, we're watching you on this one." So good for King from that perspective.

dom youngross of OH 6:48PM August 16, 2011

Susan Milligan

Susan Milligan

Susan Milligan is a political and foreign affairs writer and contributed to a biography of the late Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, "Last Lion: The Fall and Rise of Ted Kennedy." Follow her on Twitter @MilliganSusan.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

JFK's Virtuoso Turn at the Bully Pulpit

Kennedy presented a radical idea: Peaceful coexistence.

Mary Kate Cary

Calling Terrorism What It Is

Refusing to call terrorism by its name helps no one.

Latest Videos

advertisement