British Government Would Be Wrong to Curtail Facebook, Twitter

August 15, 2011 RSS Feed Print

Social media has been rightly credited with helping to organize democratic movements in the Middle East and elsewhere. But like any technology or information source, social media can be used for destructive ends. Unfortunately, officials here and abroad are responding in a stunningly heavy-handed manner that suggests democracy may be in trouble closer to home.

British Prime Minister David Cameron, under fire for the nation's inability to quell the riots in London and elsewhere, has told Parliament he wants the government to consider banning some people from using Facebook and Twitter if they are thought to be using them to plot criminal activity. Cameron's frustration is understandable, and social media sites like Facebook and Twitter indeed give hooligans—along with democracy activists—an efficient way or organizing people. But the proposed crackdown is alarming, amounting to a preemptive denial of free speech and association prized in an open society. [See a roundup of editorial cartoons about the mideast uprisings.]

Meanwhile, in San Francisco, Bay Area Rapid Transit officials said they shut down power to cellular towers between certain stations last week to thwart activists planning a protest of a fatal shooting by BART police in early July. That action, of course, punished everyone, not just those who might or might not have been planning a protest. And what is wrong with a peaceful protest?

To be sure, the law needs to catch up with technology. Some online transgressions have rightly been identified as crimes, such as child pornography. The law is woefully behind on matters of online harassment, slander, libel and plagiarism, especially in an age when people seem to think that the ability to cut and paste makes it acceptable to steal someone else's writing. The abhorrently irresponsible behavior of the team at WikiLeaks is an example of how much more damaging it is to have the Internet available to reveal sensitive national security information. But Facebook and Twitter are not themselves the problem; they are just the newest tools being used for organizing people, both for constructive and destructive purposes. Social media should not be used to break the law. But banning or preventing the use of technology doesn't protect our democracy. It undermines it.

Tags:
David Cameron,
Mideast peace,
London,
politics,
Twitter,
Facebook

Reader Comments Read all comments (2)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Suspending rights of free speech and communication is never a good idea, and should only be considered under the most dire conditions of an emergency.

While cutting off communications MIGHT have success in stopping mass gathering, it also curtails the ability of officials to mass arrest those whom advocate such gatherings for violence sake.

junior of DC 3:32PM August 16, 2011

bhalo achi

cool kawser of CA 11:14AM August 15, 2011

Susan Milligan

Susan Milligan

Susan Milligan is a political and foreign affairs writer and contributed to a biography of the late Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, Last Lion: The Fall and Rise of Ted Kennedy.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Obama's Mixed-Bag Week

The Obama camp can celebrate Dick Lugar defeat, but should worry about the Scott Walker recall.

Mary Kate Cary

Obama Attacks as Economic Cliff Looms

The president can't afford to talk about the economy, but with a 2013 fiscal time bomb approaching, the rest of us can't afford not to.

Latest Video

advertisement