GOP's FAA Fight Costing More Money Than It Saves

August 3, 2011 RSS Feed Print

Why is Washington a mess and the nation's finances in trouble?

The answer can be found, in part, in Congress's fight over funding for the Federal Aviation Administration. That's the agency which runs the nation's airports, provides construction jobs, and regulates and enforces airline safety—an issue that has been of some importance to Americans since 9-11. [See a collection of political cartoons on airport security.]

Republican lawmakers want to cut subsidies for rural airports, and further want to reverse an Obama administration decision that would make it easier for airline employees to unionize. The congressional standoff has forced a partial shutdown at the FAA, and deprived the federal treasury of—so far—$200 million in revenues from taxes passengers pay when they fly. Notably, the $200 million is the size of the entire rural airports subsidy program, meaning that the Capitol fight has cost the government far more money than it would have saved if the GOP had gotten its way on the budget cuts. Since Congress has adjourned until September, the treasury is expected to lose $1 billion in revenues from flyers.

The real issue, however, may not be cash, but a deep ideological divide over unions. The previous rule required union organizers to secure support from a majority of all a company's employees; the new Obama administration rules put the standard at a majority of everyone who turned out to vote. House Republicans don't like the new rule, and are insisting that the Senate okay their reversal of the standard as a condition of keeping the FAA running. [Check out our editorial cartoons on the GOP.]

So far, the FAA has been able to continue to conduct air traffic control and other safety work. But 4,000 agency employees have been furloughed, and thousands more have lost work because the FAA has been forced to issue stop-work orders on some 200 construction projects.

Congress, meanwhile, is gone for the rest of the summer, back in their districts to commune with their constituents. Perhaps someone will suggest that congressmen secure a majority of all eligible voters—not just a majority of those who turn out at the polls—to keep their jobs

Tags:
FAA,
Senate,
Congress,
politics,
unions,
republican party

Reader Comments Read all comments (12)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

"The GOP, ( Grand Obstructionist Party) has filibustered over 500 bills and appointments ...."

Ummm, there have only been 500 votes of cloture in the Senate since 1961...........

PS - the Repubs just did an end run around the Democrats and passed the FAA bill.

enzo of IN 6:51PM August 06, 2011

To blame the Democrat controlled Senate for the non passage of the FAA bill is a disingenuous statement. The bill, like so many that have reached the Senate, is being filibustered by the Republicans in the Senate. The GOP, ( Grand Obstructionist Party) has filibustered over 500 bills and appointments and have now upped the ante to holding the economy hostage so they can get their way. In the mean time, real people are losing their jobs, homes ,and their life savings because of failed economic policies the Republicans wish to pursue again. If we go back in time and read some of these posters comments around the last election, it was all about jobs. Yet the House and the Republican minority in the Senate have refused to do anything about jobs.

joe zimmer of WI 12:43PM August 04, 2011

I get so sick of hearing that 16-17 million is only chump change. This bill was passed by the house some time ago and if the people read it, they would support it. The bill would cut off subsidies for small airports that are within 90 miles of a larger one or cut subsidies when they exceed $1,000 per passenger as they do on so many of these empty flights. What is not reasonable about that and why doesn't the Senate sign the bill and why doesn't the media report the facts. If we can't cut a measly 16 million then how can we cut the 10 trillion in new Debt thats projected in the next 10 years?

justamaz of CA 11:53PM August 03, 2011

Susan Milligan

Susan Milligan

Susan Milligan is a political and foreign affairs writer and contributed to a biography of the late Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, Last Lion: The Fall and Rise of Ted Kennedy.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Obama's Mixed-Bag Week

The Obama camp can celebrate Dick Lugar defeat, but should worry about the Scott Walker recall.

Mary Kate Cary

Obama Attacks as Economic Cliff Looms

The president can't afford to talk about the economy, but with a 2013 fiscal time bomb approaching, the rest of us can't afford not to.

Latest Video

advertisement