GOP Could Regret Pushing Elizabeth Warren Into a Senate Run

July 19, 2011 RSS Feed Print

Senate Republicans must feel awfully confident about the re-election chances of GOP Massachusetts Sen. Scott Brown. Otherwise, it could be really, really awkward in the Senate dining room come 2013.

[Check out a roundup of GOP political cartoons.]

Well, perhaps not in the Senate dining room, since lawmakers don't even break bread together anymore—which could also be one of the reasons why Republicans in both chambers think it's OK to berate Elizabeth Warren, once the leading contender to run the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. The bureau was Warren's idea and is part of a sweeping reform package passed in the wake of the Wall Street screw-ups that caused, or at least aggravated, the recession. Warren has been running the operation without the title, and now she won't get that, since Republicans vowed to stop her nomination if President Obama appointed her to the job.

Wall Street doesn't seem to like Warren, which, under the circumstances, should hardly be a barrier. Given the disaster Wall Street wrought—and the bailouts U.S. taxpayers subsidized to salvage the “too big to fail” companies—it seems that the financial services industry should have the decency to skulk along in their jobs, metaphorical tails between their legs. But they are bold enough to voice opposition to Warren, who presumably would be a little tough on them. [See political cartoons on the economy.]

Then there are the Republicans who don't like the consumer protection board at all, or at least don't like it in the form it has been created. The time to have that fight was when the bill was being written, and the GOP lost that fight. Holding up any nomination to force changes in a law already passed by officials elected to office by voters is nothing other than extortion and a brazen effort to rewrite history.

Obama has nominated former Ohio Attorney General Richard Cordray to head the bureau. Perhaps he will be confirmed; perhaps the GOP will hold up any nomination to thwart the enforcement of a law they don't like. Warren, meanwhile, is being encouraged by Democrats to run for Brown's U.S. Senate seat. While Brown has a strong war chest and decent approval ratings, any Democrat in deep-blue Massachusetts would present a strong challenge to the junior senator, particularly in a presidential election year. If Warren runs and wins, Senate Republicans should hope she has a short memory or a very forgiving nature. Dealing with Warren as a colleague is much more delicate than dealing with her as head of a consumer protection board.

Tags:
Massachusetts,
Congress,
Scott Brown,
democratic party,
Barack Obama,
politics,
republican party,
2012 presidential election

Reader Comments Read all comments (13)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I'd definitely vote for Warren if she runs and Brown doesn't change some of his opinions. I'm a converted moderate republican, registered as an independent a few years ago and given the slant of the GOP today, I could not see myself supporting any GOP candidate that has signed on to the Grover Norquist blood oath. Yes, in the past decade, spending has gone through the roof, but remember when the bulk of the spending occurred and who spent it. Just look at our precious but bloated defense budget... we could cut it by 50% and still be the number one defense budget in the world. Do we really need to spend more than double what number #2 China spends? Our budget is bigger than the combined budgets of number #2-#30!

Warren is very savvy when it comes to spending, and especially when it comes to budgeting and consumer financial issues. I'd like to see her run but unlike Martha Coakley, she will have to be very visible and informative in her campaign. If Scott Brown came out and said Norquist's mantra of no new taxes is bunk and supported the notion that we do need to step up the revenue stream with changes in the taxes and elimination of subsides... then this would get very interesting for me and other independents.

Mike of MA 10:11AM August 19, 2011

it's been non-stop republicans might/could/possibly/perhaps hurt themselves this, might/could/possibly/perhaps hurt themselves that, and might/could/possibly/perhaps hurt themselves the other from the dynamic USNWR blog-singing duo of Susan Milligan and Robert Scheissslinger.

Why don't the two just cut to the chase and sing:

...

...

...

...

When-you-wish-upon-a-star...

Or better yet:

...

...

...

...

Some-where, there's a place for us...

Or if the two REALLY want to bring the house down and leave no dry eye:

...

...

...

...

MEM-REEEEEEEEEEEEEE, all a-lone in the MOON-LIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIGHT...

Too bad the two can't hop into a time machine and jump back enough to forewarn Obama that he would blow his foot off in trying to palm Specter the Defector off on the people of PA while sending bag-man Bill C. to... 'career-counsel/mentor' Sestak -- and wind up with republican Senator Toomey instead.

Hence, the continuing update that will follow Milligan:

...

...

...

...

follow her wherever sheeeeeeeeeeeeeee may go:

War Powers 90 plus a whole bunch of additional days:

Dem-shill bloggers Milligan & Scheissslinger continue to be a wishin'... and hopin'... and thinkin'... and prayin'... that Obama's lawyer-shopped non-war Libyan war won't get in his re-electme way next year. If they could actually see his lawyer-shopped non-war Libyan war that is. Which they can't. 'Cause that's not what dem-shill bloggers get paid to do.

dom youngross of OH 2:38PM July 31, 2011

1. “all your ranting does not disprove anything is said.people do have a right to their opinions,not just you! ”

When you says things like Newt was fired from House. You have right to your wrong opinion sure. Who is stopping you from expressing your opinion ? Give me his/her name !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I want you to express your opinion more. Stop skipping articles.

2. “as to your comment on the situation in wisconsin.if many people there wern;t having buyers remorse,there would be no pending recalls. ”

Therefore, people had “ buyers remorse” with Bill Clinton too. See the tie in ? Easily see by most.

3. “just an update. whats now taking place in wisconsin has nothing to do with bill clinton”

Just proved it does to normal person.

4. “i repeat if mrs.warren decides to run she will be a formidable candidate.”

I showed my proof. Show yours. Making another Sarah did not show sympathy to victims in AZ shooting mistake or another Newt was kicked out of House mistake ?

5. “if you donn;t like that opinion,that your problem”

I enjoy showing your lack of knowledge...

Bill Hedges of MO 7:24PM July 19, 2011

Susan Milligan

Susan Milligan

Susan Milligan is a political and foreign affairs writer and contributed to a biography of the late Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, Last Lion: The Fall and Rise of Ted Kennedy.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Obama's Mixed-Bag Week

The Obama camp can celebrate Dick Lugar defeat, but should worry about the Scott Walker recall.

Mary Kate Cary

Obama Attacks as Economic Cliff Looms

The president can't afford to talk about the economy, but with a 2013 fiscal time bomb approaching, the rest of us can't afford not to.

Latest Video

advertisement