Self Checkout and Saving American Jobs

July 13, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (14)

As Congress and the White House blame each other for the poor employment situation, here's one thing Americans can do to help save jobs:

Refuse to use those self check-out machines grocery stores and pharmacies are increasingly encouraging consumers to choose.

Refuse. Refuse adamantly. Do not be moved by the manager who looks at you beseechingly and pathetically as you wait in a long line to check out with an actual human being. When a manager tries to lure you to the self check-outs, saying, "I'm just trying to help you learn how to use the machine," respond by saying, "no, you want me to help you put someone out of a job. And I won't do it."

Never mind that the machines can be confusing, that they are of unreliable accuracy, and that they take any social or human element out of shopping. Managers and store owners have insisted (to me, anyway, when I say I would prefer to stand in line than use those things) that they are just trying to make the shopping experience faster and more efficient. No, they're not. They're trying to eliminate jobs and increase profits.

[See a collection of cartoons on the economy]

I like my regular check-out folks. I like Ron at my local 17th St. Safeway, who calls me by name, gives me a broad smile, and lets me know – in case I didn't – that the whole wheat English muffins I was buying are actually on sale, two-for-one, and that he'll wait while I run to get another one. I like the always smiling young woman at my nearby Walgreens, who notices when I'm buying something that has an in-store coupon, finds a circular, and credits me with the discount. This is a country that once prided itself on customer service – something I came to appreciate while shopping in Kiev in the 1990s and dealing with clerks who acted as though they were doing me a big favor by selling me anything at all. Which, I guess, during communism was probably the case.  But I'm back in America, consumer heaven, and I don't want to do the work the stores used to hire people to do. It's impersonal and an unnecessary burden on the buyer.

They may be tough, in the standoff. They may try to make it actually impossible to check out with an actual person. Do not be weak against this pressure. It happened to me, at a CVS, when I was headed to the check-out counter with several items. No one was behind the counter. I waited, then went to look for a clerk. A re-stocker sent me over to a woman who had been standing by – but not behind – the counter. She moved to escort me over to the self check-out machines. I said calmly that I would not use those machines. She said she was not authorized to use the cash register. With no one to ring up my purchases, I left my items on the counter. CVS lost a sale (and, except in emergencies, a longtime customer). I always wondered what happened to the items I left on the counter.

Perhaps one of the self check-out machines returned them to the shelves.

Tags:
employment,
economy

Reader Comments Read all comments (14)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

How is self checkout NOT technological improvement? An asinine comment like that hardly even needs to be argued. The word "improvement" has no opinionated meaning in that context. It is technology that allows a machine to do work in place of a human, and it did not exist in the past; it is a technological improvement.

The natural progression is for technology to improve and for companies to use this technology to decrease expenses (labor). Ideally this decrease expense gets turned around into reduced prices, although of course some of it goes right on up to the company itself. Regardless, this IS the natural progression of technology and labor. People are having to adapt (ie: learn to maintain the machines, provide service the technology yet cannot, get an education to BETTER the technology). It's akin to arguing that we should get rid of phones because they put mailmen out of business. While it may be true, it can't happen and fighting it is futile/ignorant.

I won't even dip into the suggestion that this is a liberal phobia of change (ironic?).

For the record I am a 21 year old college student.

Elijah of NJ 3:57PM November 05, 2012

For all of you who keep trying ~so very hard~ to compare self checkout to technological improvement, your arguments are FLAWED. The scanning is still having to be performed.

It's not a technological improvement to merely pass the responsibility of labor to the customer.

Was it Pete, who spoke of Shovels and Spoons in some grand parable? Are you kidding??????????????

Technological improvement would be to simply walk out the door and everything is scanned automatically via RFID as a three dimensional bulk.

A lot of idiots responding to this and are missing the point and attempting to act three pounds smarter than they really are by bringing up technology.

LEAST YOU FORGET, the scanners themselves supposedly helped things so checkers no longer had to key everything in.

What did the stores do? Installed 30 scanners then had 4 manned, knowing those 4 could do the work of 15 of the old push button checkers.

What, are you all a bunch of right wing nuts who think you have it all figured out?

You're so far off the mark I don't see how you function.

Only an idiot would argue against the article. A soulless, psychopathic idiot who works in retail in management or has a high paying job and is completely clueless.

Walmart has gutted the country. You did it to yourselves. All in the name of getting a cheaper television or a near free plastic doodad. By default, you are trading with Communist China, yet, you condemn China in your political ideology.

Hypocrites.

Congratulations. I hope you choke on it.

I WILL NEVER USE SELF CHECKOUT. IT IS INSULTING. PARASITIC. FLAWED.

Your Superior of TX 2:59PM August 20, 2012

"Sorry, until you pay my bills I will accept a job I am offered even if I hate it."

@ Anonymous

What incredibly low standards you possess. You call that a "job?"

@ Gerard

To whom are you speaking? Toiling in the fields? Are you on crack? Who said anything about old fashioned? What kind of question is that? Oh. Wait. Perhaps you intended to put something other than a question mark after your first sentence and you are ACCUSING the author of being old fashioned.

Perhaps your grammar school had self-graduate as an option.

Your response still leaves the customer doing the work without pay and eliminates the human element while increasing the retailer's profit at the expense of jobs.

Both of you would make good Nazis who just "do as they're told."

Stupidity is rampant in this country.

I can barely stand it anymore. People just roll over and do whatever some greedy pigs in control make up the rules.

The pigs are walking! The pigs are walking!

Your Superior of TX 2:33PM August 20, 2012

Susan Milligan

Susan Milligan

Susan Milligan is a political and foreign affairs writer and contributed to a biography of the late Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, "Last Lion: The Fall and Rise of Ted Kennedy." Follow her on Twitter @MilliganSusan.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement