Obama's Press Conference Kicked Off 2012 Campaign

June 30, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (10)

He was always "no drama Obama." He promised to bring civility and a sense of cooperation back to Washington.

But in his news conference this week, President Obama had clearly had enough of trying to make nice with Republicans—or even, for that matter, with Congress in general, which he chided for heading back to their districts for constituent work periods instead of staying in town, as he has done, to work on the debt crisis.

[Check out a roundup of political cartoons about the budget and national deficit.]

The president has a point, but of course, he doesn’t have to be personally, and constantly, raising money for his re-election campaign, which is a big part of what members of Congress do when they head home for weekends and recesses. Presidents have people who do that for them, but most congressmen and senators have to do some of the personal pleas for cash on their own.

But Obama’s irritation and newly combative tone suggests two important turning points: the 2012 campaign has officially started, and the dream of having a civil and cooperative relationship with a divided Congress was just that—a dream. [Check out a roundup of political cartoons on the 2012 GOP primary.]

It was a nice idea, trying to work together and bridge ideological and regional differences to make good public policy, even if that policy included compromises that gave everyone something to hate in the final legislation. But Congress, while long a place for diverse opinions, is no longer a place where lawmakers are willing to put policy ahead of campaign politics. Giving in, even a little bit, on an issue might produce an actual budget or other legislation, but it will also annoy the base in each party, imperiling campaigns. And with the majority status of both chambers of Congress in play next year, people aren’t inclined to compromise.

Obama, too, was in campaign mode at his press conference, making repeated references to "corporate jet" owners and other wealthy people and businesses he said would benefit at the expense of the middle class. Capitol Hill Democrats have been making that case for many months ("Bravo!" House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi said in response to Obama’s newly confrontational tone). But Obama’s pivot suggests that he, too, has lost faith in the ability of the two parties to work things out. But the battles are rarely anymore about actual policy. They are about regaining the majority in the next election.

Tags:
Democratic Party,
Barack Obama,
Congress,
2012 presidential election,
Nancy Pelosi,
Republican Party

Reader Comments Read all comments (10)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Bill Hedges of MO is only interested in defending Corporate Jet Owners to keep their subsidies, not interested in reducing the spending on these kind of tax breaks and loopholes. Its all the loopholes and tax breaks are responsible for our budget deficits, like the Jet Owners subsidies that Cantor and Bill Hedges are defending.

Bill, how can you defend the welfare queens who think they should be able to fund their jets with taxpayer money? That's what we this debate is about, tax breaks for the richest and the gangsters who can hire the most lobbyists against the people who have to pay for these corp jetsetters and who don't have oddles of lobbyists, just their representatives ( who all seem to be bought off ).

Ron of IL 4:53PM July 08, 2011

barry just forgot to condemn himself for helping oil companies too:

“The 2005 Energy Policy Act was one of the friendliest ever with over $10 billion in handouts. It lets oil giants pay federal royalties in barrels of oil and grants exemptions on some wells, subsidizes a new R & D program for ultra deep water drilling and unconventional oil and gas development, creates hundreds of millions of dollars in new tax breaks, increases what oil and gas companies can deduct on pipeline expenses, provides more liability protection besides the $75 million cap (established by the 1990 Oil Pollution Act after the 1989 Exxon Valdez disaster, an amount too small to matter).”

“As an Illinois senator, six months into his term, Obama supported it, an early clue to where he stood, and how he hoped to gain – the usual “you scratch my back, I’ll scratch yours” payoff.”

“It worked hugely with BP, the Center for Responsive Politics (CRP) reporting that its employees and political action committees gave more to him than to any other federal candidate in the past 20 years.”

“During his 2008 campaign, CRP reported that the oil and gas industry overall gave him $884,000, more than any to other lawmaker except John McCain, and no wonder. His Senate voting record showed what they bought:”

“the right of mining companies to strip mine everywhere, including on government lands; vast new powers and handouts to the nuclear industry; harmful biofuels production; lax regulation; and other pro-business, anti-populist measures – besides supporting the 2005 Energy Policy Act.”

“Obama promised change, and delivered betrayal – evident now in the Gulf, America’s greatest ever environmental disaster, fast becoming the most catastrophic in history, a shameless addition to his resume, already revealing a world class rogue and failed president less than a year and half into office. No wonder calls for his impeachment have begun, including by James Petras on May 27, on the Progressive Radio News Hour, hosted by this writer who wholeheartedly agrees.”

http://warisacrime.org/node/52692

Bill Hedges of MO 10:01PM July 03, 2011

We can think of a lot of things that we could do different, even if we only have a fraction of the information that he has.

Democracy means we can gripe about everything and insult every politician.

But it does not change the basic fact that Americans prefer peace, freedom and respect and are set to re-elect him because he is doing a good job.

This is said in light of the fact that both parties need to go back and forth in coming up with leaders and having both Democratic and Republican presidents.

Would be nice if we could get rid of political parties and everybody just be able to vote for the wisest, smartest, and most popular person.

Leonel of TX 5:18PM July 03, 2011

Susan Milligan

Susan Milligan

Susan Milligan is a political and foreign affairs writer and contributed to a biography of the late Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, "Last Lion: The Fall and Rise of Ted Kennedy." Follow her on Twitter @MilliganSusan.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement