GOP Debate Told Nothing New About 2012 Candidates

June 14, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (16)

President Obama is a "failure." He has done nothing to improve the economy. He’s not a leader. He has no foreign policy.

These were the assessments of the GOP field at their debate Monday night in New Hampshire. Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney used the word "failure" so many times, it started to become more a study of elementary political messaging than a smart analysis of the president’s policies and performance. The GOP candidates don’t like Obama. That was obvious. But is it news? And more importantly, is an early debate useful to primary voters if all the primary candidates insist on pretending they are each in a head-to-head with the Democratic general election foe?

[See a slide show of GOP 2012 contenders.]

It’s normal for primary candidates to avoid saying anything too specific in early debates; that’s a good way to avoid being taken apart by various policy analysts and foes in both parties. Former Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty is feeling that nonlove already, with attacks coming swiftly and brutally on his insistence that the foundering economy could grow at 5 percent a year. But at least he put out a plan.

No such details came from the panel of Republicans last night on the testy issues of the day—Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, debt. Never mind the issues that were not raised—homelessness, poverty, a rethink of No Child Left Behind. The contenders were instead content to direct their vitriol at Obama. They even avoided going after Romney, who has been oddly deemed the front runner despite the fact that not a single vote has been cast. Pawlenty, who recently referred to "Obamneycare" as a derisive reference to both the federal and Massachusetts healthcare laws, did some fancy footwork to avoid repeating the (for Republicans) legitimate questions about the similarities between the Massachusetts law and the federal law so hated by the GOP. To attack Romney would be to acknowledge him as the group’s leader, so they left him alone. [Check out political cartoons about the 2012 GOP field.]

The highlight of the debate—if we can call it that—was Romney’s announcement that the Stanley Cup-seeking Boston Bruins were up by four over the Vancouver Canucks (or the "Canuckleheads," as Buffalo News columnist Bucky Gleason cleverly calls them). [Vote now: Who is your pick for the 2012 GOP nomination?]

Early debates often simply serve to introduce candidates to the New Hampshire audience. The voters may have to wait longer to learn why they should pick one contender over the others.

Tags:
Democratic Party,
Tim Pawlenty,
social security,
Republican Party,
deficit and national debt,
2012 presidential election,
healthcare reform,
Medicaid,
unemployment,
Barack Obama,
Medicare,
Mitt Romney

Reader Comments Read all comments (16)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Interesting viewpoints. You should post your ideas about this on www.whitehousevoice.com!

Matthew of LA 3:22PM June 16, 2011

just a few memorable quotes from the wacky world of michele bachmann.

from business insider

www.businessinsider.com/ michele bachmann-quotes-22011-6

www.hyerdebate.com/ 2011/06/13/u.s.representative-michele bachman-presidential

enjoy!

bruce b of NV 1:03AM June 15, 2011

Putting a mild spin on it rather than calling the debate the waste of time it was. Let's admit that we learned nothing from the debate we didn't already know. The NH GOP love fest avoided any real issues and harped on the same old worn out conservative mockery, most of little interest to most Americans but vital to the special interests and the extreme fringe right. All the 7 wannabees were lacking on any details but patronizing to no end.

To put it bluntly, it was a boring debate - if you could even call it a debate. The candidates circled the wagons on any issues, as if there could be no disputing the prefabricated standard responses. None of the candidates dared to challenge one another or depart from the standard conservative gospel, except maybe Ron Paul or Newt, but both of these guys are already written off by the party establishment. If the candidate were there to differentiate themselves, they failed miserably.

Its early in the game, and maybe these dweebs will get a chance to duke it out yet, and we might be able to articulate why we know its such a weak field.

Jill of KS 11:31PM June 14, 2011

Susan Milligan

Susan Milligan

Susan Milligan is a political and foreign affairs writer and contributed to a biography of the late Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, "Last Lion: The Fall and Rise of Ted Kennedy." Follow her on Twitter @MilliganSusan.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Political Enemies: Good vs. Perfect

In politics the perfect is often the enemy of the good.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement