John Edwards' Indictment Could Set New Campaign Law Standard

June 3, 2011 RSS Feed Print

John Edwards, many would agree, is quite a jerk. But is he a criminal?

The former North Carolina senator, Democratic vice presidential nominee and presidential primary contender was indicted today on charges that he funneled money from campaign donors to pay for the coverup of his affair with Rielle Hunter. While someone’s extramarital affairs are arguably no one’s business but that of the individuals involved and their families, Edwards’s relationship, and his handling of it, rise to a new and public level.

He lied about the affair, which he conducted while his wife, Elizabeth Edwards, was battling breast cancer. He tried to make it appear that the child produced from his relationship with Hunter was, in fact, the spawn of a campaign staffer. And he did all of this while he was running for president. [Read: Why Don't Men Like Schwarzenegger, Edwards Use Condoms?]

That’s all very distasteful, to say the least. But what is less clear is whether Edwards is guilty of an actual crime. Prosecutors are looking at whether the money paid to Hunter and the former campaign aide constitute some sort of illegal political donation, since covering up the affair had the effect of improving Edwards’s public image—such as it was. By that logic, almost anything could be construed as a political donation—if someone offered to mow his lawn, is that an illegal in-kind contribution, since a well-manicured lawn makes someone look like an upstanding homeowner, and therefore a more attractive candidate? Haircuts, teeth-cleanings—is anything turned into a campaign event, just because it affects someone’s image in front of the electorate? [Read: Elizabeth Edwards—a Courageous Inspiration.]

Elizabeth Edwards’s death from cancer last year was tragic, made sadder still by the very pubic revelation of her husband’s betrayal of her. There is a natural desire to want to punish Edwards in some way, if only to avenge his deceased wife. Prosecutors may succeed in doing so—and if they do, they will establish a sweeping new standard for candidates for public office.

Tags:
Elizabeth Edwards,
democratic party,
politics,
John Edwards

Reader Comments Read all comments (7)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I really don't care What their private lives are like, republican or democrat but I do care that when their asked, they lie about it. If they don't want to say anything why don't they just say it's none of your business. When they lie they lie to the people and by lieing to the people it shows they really don't care. This shpuld be a criminal offence just like a person going before congress and lying; because if I remember right the people are really the court of the land. Congress is there by their will and they need to remember that.

Charles Davis of TX 9:27PM June 08, 2011

Yes, Edwards was and is a jerk. And yes, Edwards is a criminal.

But more to the point, was Milligan even aware of the following before she tried to use 'logic' to try and scrape some of the sleaze off Edwards:

$400 haircut for man of the people / Edwards reimbursing his presidential campaign for deluxe dos

"A spokesman for the campaign, Eric Schultz, said that Torrenueva Hair Designs of Beverly Hills sent the bill for a haircut in February and a second last month to the Edwards campaign and that the campaign mistakenly paid it."

http://articles.sfgate.com/2007-04-20/news/17241982_1_edwards-campaign-torrenueva-hair-designs-haircuts

Key words: mistakenly paid it. Straight from the campaign horse's mouth.

Milligan here tries to scrape some of the sleaze off Edwards with a head fake away from the underlying story. But even sleazebag Edwards himself rebutted her attempt, four years in advance.

Milligan touching 'logic' is like a kid touching a downed powerline. Or Anthony Weiner spending a week lying to us -- because of course the media was so 'inexcusable' to him, according to Milligan.

Yeah, if you're starving to death and a moldy potato is all you have, you'll scrape it, and scrape it, and keep scraping it hoping something is left to eat. And that's the position dem shills like Milligan find themselves in wrt Edwards and Weiner.

dom youngross of OH 8:11PM June 06, 2011

"John Edwards' Indictment Could Set New Campaign Law Standard"

Gee, you mean something like : "If you think you can accept under the table money so that you can hush up something that would derail your candidacy, THINK AGAIN." ????

Heaven forbid that our politicians should ever be held accountable for sleazy private life actions that they think have to be hidden from public view.

After all, everybody knows that dishonesty in private life is no indicator that they will be dishonest in their public life, right?

junior of DC 2:48PM June 04, 2011

Susan Milligan

Susan Milligan

Susan Milligan is a political and foreign affairs writer and contributed to a biography of the late Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, Last Lion: The Fall and Rise of Ted Kennedy.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Obama's Mixed-Bag Week

The Obama camp can celebrate Dick Lugar defeat, but should worry about the Scott Walker recall.

Mary Kate Cary

Obama Attacks as Economic Cliff Looms

The president can't afford to talk about the economy, but with a 2013 fiscal time bomb approaching, the rest of us can't afford not to.

Latest Video

advertisement