Celebrations After bin Laden's Death Went Too Far

May 3, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (29)

Osama bin Laden’s death--his assassination, to be accurate--understandably unleashes a series of emotions among Americans. There is relief, satisfaction, celebration, worry about retribution, and even some sense of disappointment that finally killing the man who had been Public Enemy Number One still doesn’t really give closure to everyone affected by the events of September 11. And "everyone," of course, is all of us, although some of us were tragically more personally affected by it than others.

What bin Laden’s death is not is a reason to reclaim American hegemony on the world stage. To those who asked the question after 9/11, "why do they hate us?"--this is partly why. It is not a justification for flying planes into the World Trade Center or engaging in violence of any sort. And the reason the perpetrators of the 9/11 attacks hate the United States is not the same as the reason more reasonable people in the rest of the world get exasperated with us. They get frustrated and resentful because they got tired of feeling as though the United States had claimed some right to dominate the world, be it militarily, economically or culturally. It’s fair to note that some of the countries that resent American dominance have had no problem relying on the United States for its leadership and financial help to resolve international crises. But one can lead without dominating, without seeming to dictate terms to the rest of the world. [See photos of reactions to Osama bin Laden's death.]

So while all of us were glad to see bin Laden gone, there is still something distasteful about the jubilant cries of "USA! USA!" at gatherings to celebrate bin Laden’s demise. It looked as though the demonstrators had just witnessed the winning of the World Cup. Their fists pumped in the air, with understandable happiness and some relief, to be sure. But the image also looked creepily like some of the crazed anti-American demonstrations that have occurred around the world. [See a slide show of six potential terrorist targets.]

I was thrilled to learn of bin Laden’s death. As soon as I felt that emotion, I half expected to feel a backlash of shame, of some guilt over feeling so overjoyed at someone’s brutal demise. But I didn’t.

I don’t like violence. I don’t even like to see violent movies. I’m not a pure pacifist; I do believe there are times when only military action can prevent more death and violence. I hadn’t, before bin Laden, understood that I was capable of feeling nothing but pure happiness over the violent death of another human being. Most likely, that is because I find it hard to see bin Laden as a human being, since he could not be to me anything other than a vessel for hate and destruction and death. Moreover, I was especially pleased that bin Laden was killed by a bullet to the head. Had he been killed by an explosion or aerial attack, the result would have been the same. But I am especially satisfied that the last thing bin Laden likely saw was a U.S. solider with an American flag on his uniform, pointing his gun at the face of evil. [See a transcript of Obama's speech on bin Laden death.]

Still, some of the spontaneous demonstrations held after the news was released turned bin Laden’s death into something else. It is a relief, and tremendously satisfying, that he is gone. Perhaps the families of those killed will feel some sort of justice, however small one man’s death is compared to the thousands of deaths he is responsible for. But we should not use this welcome event as proof to the rest of the world that the United States is back in charge of the whole world. American has rid the world stage of its worst player. That is a reason to lead, not to control.

Tags:
Osama bin Laden,
national security terrorism and the military

Reader Comments Read all comments (29)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I agree - we're better than that. I don't blame the young people who have been raised on 24 hour news on a variety of crazy information sources.

I blame the media who look for anything that can by sensationalized. I don't know when it happened, but it's clear that the university schools of journalism stopped teaching objective reporting and ethics some time ago.

JR Gordon of FL 2:26PM May 05, 2011

The reason the Bible tells us not to celebrate the death of the wicked is because the Bible points ALL of our celebration toward the LORD, not for or against any human. Since the majority of our country is only Christian by name, they do not understand your scriptures or your idea.

It would be better for you to use scripture to thank God for once again saving us from the evil one. Simply lift your voice (type) in praise for Him; do not criticize others who do not understand your relationship with him. Your praise of the LORD will do far more to generate interest in your LORD than criticizing others.

I, too, celebrate the death of our enemy:

I praise the LORD for his divine deliverance. He may have used hands of soldiers, the planning of generals, the council of chiefs, and the authority He has given to presidents, but the LORD is still the one who defeated our enemy. He, alone, deserves MY praise.!

And He leaves it up to each individual to figure that out.

Kenny Robert of SC 6:18PM May 04, 2011

Ms Mulligan’s column seems to be something she wrote for herself due to feelings of guilt by her reaction of the death of Osama bin Laden. After stating that she doesn’t like violence she admits being “…especially satisfied that the last thing bin Laden likely saw was a U.S. solider with an American flag on his uniform, pointing his gun at the face of evil.” But somehow this is acceptable while jubilant cries of “USA! USA!” are not!

She is correct that others in the world get exasperated with us. But one must separate the 3 categories she states of us claiming “some right to dominate the world, be it militarily, economically or culturally.” I’ll concede the point of militarily. But the latter two? We can’t force that on the world. That is the fallout of a country that has its act together and is efficient and has a populace that works together to produce. The fact that our society is stable enough that others invest in us, trust our currency and buy our produce I’ll take as a compliment on our way of life. Other countries don’t have to buy from us, but they do. Also culturally, if others want to add what we put forwards to their own culture again all I’ll say is a polite thank you. I enjoy what they add to the world also.

Lastly, I don’t understand how she makes the leap of logic that from our sense of relief of ridding the world of this evil man, and our show of pride, that any of us are stating that we want to control the world now. Ms Mulligan, where was this stated? If it was just your sense of watching the news, I would say this is more of an issue with you and how you interpret events.

Louis of CA 2:15PM May 04, 2011

Susan Milligan

Susan Milligan

Susan Milligan is a political and foreign affairs writer and contributed to a biography of the late Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, "Last Lion: The Fall and Rise of Ted Kennedy." Follow her on Twitter @MilliganSusan.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement