Paul Ryan Ignores Polls, Shows Leadership in Budget Debate

April 5, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (22)

You have to hand it to Rep. Paul Ryan. He clearly doesn’t read the polls, or doesn’t care what they say.

That is the sort of snide comment often used in the political and media worlds to deride policymakers for offering up unpopular ideas. But in our ridiculously poll-driven, finger-in-the-wind climate in Washington, Ryan’s behavior displays an unusual courage and leadership in the budget battle.

[Check out a roundup of political cartoons on the budget and deficit.]

To be sure, there are troublesome elements to Ryan’s budget proposal. He wants to block-grant Medicaid, the federal-state healthcare program for the poor and disabled. Ryan’s idea is that states should have more flexibility in running the program; critics rightly worry that the burden for the expensive program will shift to the states, and that some states will underserve needy populations. On Medicare, the federal health plan for seniors, Ryan wants to set up a system under which seniors choose among private plans subsidized by Medicare. Understandably, that idea makes some people concerned that subsidies will drop and coverage will be inconsistent. The whole idea of Medicare is the pauper-or-prince standard, under which everyone in the program gets the same deal. [Vote now: Should Ryan's budget plan become law?]

Those are legitimate concerns, but at least the conversation is budget-driven, instead of poll-driven or campaign-driven. Everyone, pretty much, agrees that the budget is out of control. A quick look at the pie charts shows that a huge portion of the budget is being spent on entitlement programs such as Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security. That doesn’t mean the budget knife should slice brutally into programs meant for old, poor, and sick people. But refusing to at least tweak those programs, simply because polls show that Americans are nervous about it, is not leadership.

Nor is it leadership to use a budget impasse to force cuts to entities some lawmakers don’t like, such as Planned Parenthood and the Environmental Protection Agency. And it’s not leadership to use a budget document to undo laws that passed the previous Congress. Taking the majority doesn’t mean that everything done before one party was in power—and before some of its more radical members were even in office—is wiped clean. [Read more about the deficit and national debt.]

Some GOP members are turning the blame on President Obama, accusing him of "punting" and failing to show leadership. But it is Congress that holds the ball right now; if anyone’s "punting," it’s members of the legislative branch who would rather use the budget impasse to undermine Obama than take their responsibility to actually solve the budget impasse. It’s times like this that one misses former House GOP leader Tom DeLay and his "No Whining" coffee mug.

Tags:
Paul Ryan,
energy policy and climate change,
Congress,
deficit and national debt,
Republican Party,
healthcare reform

Reader Comments Read all comments (22)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Wow it is amazing what 20 years will do. I’m an old school conservative as in ROCKEFELLER REPUBLICAN, and I don’t care much for the activities of Dick Armey and the Koch Brothers who seem to be carrying on their father’s attempts to free corporate interests of any governmental controls whatsoever. So that is my perspective.

Having given full disclosure, I must now protest your column.

When I first started reading editorial commentary in serious newspapers as a twenty something, I recall that the reporters and editors writing it usually took the trouble to take the recent history and back-round of events into consideration when arguing their editorial opinion. I’m shocked that you do not bother to mention that there is no chance of passage for this bill. Nor do you mention that the numbers in the proposal do not add up in -even the loosest reckoning. That is a failure of reporting. The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office might have been consulted before Ms. Mulligan dubbed the silly document: “Leadership.”

I’m a conservative that would like very much to see a smaller tax burden and less government. But, as person who has had business with the insurance industry throughout my career. It amazes me that a journalist who is entrusted to opine regarding federal budget policy fails to note the basic reality inherent in Mr. Ryan’s proposal that turning Medicare into a voucher program will result in a vast transfer of tax generated monies into the hands of an aggressively profitable private industry. An industry whose recent handling of the monies of their policy holders nearly lead to the collapse of the entire transatlantic financial system.

As a conservative I want lower taxes that are grudgingly spent. Giving-over Social Security to the investment management industry, and Medicare to the multinational insurance corporations is not conservatism it is a special interests wolf in conservative clothing.

Saumarez Fitzwilliam of NY 5:34PM April 26, 2011

I think the Republicans have really shot themselves in the foot with this. Some, and im certainly not one of them, may be willing to see healthcare in this country turned into a voucher system with the elderly and needy left at the tender mercies of insurance companies because they feel it is a sacrifice worth making to tackle the defecit. What people will not put up with is wasting a $trillion-plus of these excruciating savings so that millionaires and corporations can get a pay rise. Corporate greed brought about this recession apparently they feel it necessary to reward them for it. Frankly it is completely inexcusable and the inevitable 'it will create jobs' knee-jerk response when they are asked to justify it is total nonsense which people just arent going to swallow.

I like this phrase 'shared sacrifice' as it sums up perfectly what is needed in times of crisis. It is completely unreasonable to expect the middle class and the vulnerable to shoulder the entire burden while the super-rich get a bonus. The rich get richer while the poor get poorer, the Republican mantra - how about we all get poorer for a while i'd settle for that!

I'm glad the Democrats put a serious budget proposal forward - there is no comparison between the two as far as i can see. They will both hurt, but the Republican budget is just a monstrosity.

Dave Fisher of PA 3:03PM April 19, 2011

It isn't courageous to create and support bad policy, even risking nothing.That's what Paul Ryan did. His supporters will not punish him for promoting bad policy that they agree with. Where's the courage?

kathy of TX 3:09PM April 14, 2011

Susan Milligan

Susan Milligan

Susan Milligan is a political and foreign affairs writer and contributed to a biography of the late Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, "Last Lion: The Fall and Rise of Ted Kennedy." Follow her on Twitter @MilliganSusan.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement