Preschool Lawsuit Shows New Face of Hypercompetitive Parents

March 21, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (6)

I love children. I am, however, starting to really hate parents.

It used to be that the parents who provoked public discontent were the neglectful ones--those who didn’t spend time with their kids, or feed them appropriately. And that’s awful, to be sure. But the helicopter parent, the smothering parent, and the hyper-competitive parent comprise their own category of most-irritating. They obsess over every tiny detail of their child’s life--be it perceived slights by their kids’ elementary school classmates or whether the soccer coach gave their children the playing position or field time desired (by the parent, not necessarily the kid)--but can’t seem to summon the time it takes to teach their kids not to scream endlessly in the mall. They’ll negotiate with two-year-olds who are not developmentally capable of such interaction, but complain to college professors about the grades their adult children earned (or quite possibly, failed to earn). [See which members of Congress get the most money from education interests.]

But it’s the super-competitive parent who is unusually disturbing. These are the types who jealously compare how many months or weeks or days ahead of other kids in the neighborhood their child was at achieving potty training. It progresses as the child grows up, with school plays and sports teams and--most importantly--attendance at a school that takes pains to exclude the riff-raff.

The most recent example is displayed in the comical lawsuit brought by a parent in Manhattan, who is appalled that the pricey preschool to which she sent her four-year-old was not providing the right training to get her daughter into an elite kindergarten.  

Sure, for many of us, kindergarten was a time of naps and snacks and hugs and games, but for Nicole Imprescia, the school just wasn’t good enough for her little Lucia. First, the parent complained, the York Avenue Preschool dumped her daughter with kids who were only two years old, and was exposed to a low-brow curriculum that involved learning shapes and colors. "Indeed, the school proved to be not a school at all, but just one big playroom," the lawsuit huffed.

What did Imprescia expect? That the preschoolers would prepare a white paper weighing the political risks of another war with a Muslim country versus the humanitarian desire to protect Libyans from slaughter by Muammar Qadhafi? [Check out a roundup of political cartoons on the Middle East protests.]

The parent’s lawyer insisted that little Lucia is very smart, and would indeed get into an Ivy League school, despite whatever damage might have been done by the age-appropriate teachings of York Avenue Preschool. In this bizarre presumption, the lawyer (and by extension, the complaining parent) are making another increasingly common mistake--to assume that paying a lot of money ($19,000 a year, for York) for schooling and tutoring and dance lessons and the like will ensure academic or even life success. It’s as if cash has everything to do with it, and the intellectual potential of the child (not to mention the motivation or academic interests of the child), has nothing to do with it.

A favorite episode of The Mary Tyler Moore Show involves the academic performance of comical anchorman Ted Baxter’s adopted child. The kid wasn’t doing well in school, and everyone was weighing in as to the reasons: was he not getting the proper instruction? Was his home life an issue? Maybe he was sick? Finally, Ted’s father put in his two cents, saying they all had missed another real possibility. "Maybe he’s just stupid," Ted’s dad said. It was hilarious, if politically incorrect, and I would certainly not sanction calling a child "stupid." But parents who truly love their children as people--and not little human stocks whose performance reflects on the parents--will accept that not every kid will excel at academics or anything else. With apologies to fans of Lake Wobegon Days, not all children are above average.

Imprescia already accomplished part of what I imagine she wanted--to make sure her little girl didn’t have to rub tiny, scraped elbows with children of parents who can’t afford to spend $19,000 on preschool. Maybe little Lucia will do better if she attends school with kids whose parents were too smart to pay such a ridiculous amount.

 

Tags:
Muammar Qadhafi,
Ivy League,
education,
parenting,
children

Reader Comments Read all comments (6)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I think there are a bunch of things mashed together in this article. Do some parents go way too far in grooming and prepping their kids? Absolutely! Is it a little sad that these days race to the top starts almost from the day a child is born (before they are born really)? You bet!

But that doesn't mean that a child who attends private school is guaranteed to have a miserable life suffocated by overbearing parent. Believe it or not, a school can be great, even if it sets you back 19,000 a year. In fact, many parents choose to pay all that money, even when they can barely afford it, simply because there is no decent alternative. Good luck getting into good public pre-k in NYC! .

Yes, filing a law suit might be a step too far but I think Nicole'a expectations were reasonable. There is absolutely nothing wrong with having curriculum that is appropriate for pre-k age and yes, shapes and colors would disappoint me as well. Remember, a good school can give a child both, good learning environment where yhe/she learns more than how to tell a green circle from a red square, and a kind nurturing "family" where one feels loved and respected. I believe that is why those schools can charge ridiculous fees and still attract many more applicants than available seats each year.

Dmitry of NY 12:17AM April 23, 2011

Did this mother read consistently to her darling ? Did she take her to the library to check out books ? Did she buy her educational toys instead of gimmicks and gadgets ? Did she take her to the park, the zoo, museums ? Did she talk to her constantly, inserting learning information into the conversation ? Did she play classical music for her ? Did she allow her to sit for endless hours watching TV or playing endless e-games ? The defense attorney should hone in on what the MOTHER contributed to this child's education. Is the mother aware that about 80 % of what a child is, is GENETIC ?

Example of parent as first teacher: When my first child (of five) was about 14 mos. old and walking really well, we counted steps as we went up them. When we were driving along a major thoroughfare, I pointed out the big advertising signs to him. When he was a little over two, he "read" his first word aloud: "Gulf" as we passed a service station. This mother may just have to accept the fact that no school can compensate for heredity or lack of intellectual stimuli at home. GET OVER IT ! Frankly, I wouldn't send one of my children to Harvard if s/he got accepted and I could afford it. That school has long rested on its laurels.

Carolyn Cooper of NC 12:11PM March 31, 2011

I think Ms Milligan needs to check the facts and perhaps understand that times are changing. Kindergarten is no longer a time of naps and snacks and hugs and games. Just go to most decent school systems, public or private. These kids are getting a significant amount of home work and expected to do and learn much more than kids in the past. Our childs teachers and school administrators were mad at us at the beginning of the kindergarten school year for allowing our son to play and have fun during the summer before kindergarten instead of teaching him and perparing him for kindergarten! I thought they were just kidding but they were serious. Come on absolutely ridiculous. The private schools are nothing less than a money making machine at the expense of our kids childhoods. It needs to stop and I think the schools that are fosterng this type of behaviour need to be held accountable.

Dr R of NJ 8:54PM March 29, 2011

Susan Milligan

Susan Milligan

Susan Milligan is a political and foreign affairs writer and contributed to a biography of the late Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, "Last Lion: The Fall and Rise of Ted Kennedy." Follow her on Twitter @MilliganSusan.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement