Defending the Lame Duck Congress

December 29, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (12)

Congress had an impressive display of accomplishments in its lame-duck session this year. Lawmakers finally, after 17 years, dispensed with the odious and discriminatory "don’t ask, don’t tell" policy requiring gays in the military to keep their sexual orientations secret. It approved a deeply flawed measure to extend the Bush-era tax cuts, giving unaffordable tax cuts to the wealthiest Americans and continuing them also for middle-class Americans who drive the consumer economy. It extended unemployment benefits for those who are still jobless. It approved the New START treaty limiting missile deployments by both the United States and Russia. And it approved an historic change in food safety laws, putting the emphasis by the Food and Drug Administration on prevention of food-borne illnesses, instead of merely responding to outbreaks.

Many Republicans are unhappy with the post-election rush, arguing that the Democrats were wrongly trying to push legislation through after the country has voiced its desire for a newer, more conservative direction. This is an unfair criticism: first, lawmakers are still in office until the new ones are sworn in, and should not be denied the right to serve out their full terms simply because new people have been elected (and the same will be true if Republicans manage to lose the House majority in 2012). Secondly, the fall elections, while misread as a national, uniform demand for more conservative principles, were largely about anger and a deep distaste for how Congress operates. And the latter sentiment is valid as a criticism of the lame duck action--but not because Congress saved its work for the last minute, but because it has become so politically difficult to do anything of substance when an election is looming. And in our hyper-obsessed media culture, an election is always looming.

[See 2010: The Year in Cartoons.]

There’s a certain high school character to the Capitol that is probably unavoidable. They have bells and recesses. Gossip is rampant, as is a pecking order that favors the seniors. They have an unfortunate tendency to screw around for nine months out of the year, then work for three weeks straight--all night.

But the delay in getting some important work done this year had more to do with politics--the GOP unwilling to give President Obama and the Democrats a legislative victory ahead of elections, and the Democrats nervous about the impact of tough votes on their own re-election campaigns. True leadership means taking the tough votes as they come. Some lawmakers did that, casting controversial votes on sweeping legislation such as the Bush-requested bank bailouts, the healthcare reform bill, and climate change. Some of them lost their races. But at least they showed political courage.

Tags:
Democratic Party,
2010 Congressional elections,
energy policy and climate change,
Congress,
Republican Party,
national security terrorism and the military,
healthcare reform,
unemployment

Reader Comments Read all comments (12)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Mr. Stone is right on one front and wrong on the another. He is right that America is safest when congress acts the least. (Clinton years). My father in law has always said every bill they pass cost you money. He is very wrong claiming the Democrats lost "big". In fact they kept the Senate something that didnt happen in 2006 when America(republican crossover) voted to throw out the Rebulican congress as a demonstration against the third lowest popularity President in history and then continued to shoot at him by electing Presdient Obama in 2008. I polled many of my republican friends and they all said I dont like Obama but I am still voting against Bush. Ironically, this is how GWB won the narrowest of elections in 2000 when Democrats were not certain of Al Gore's committment to the Presidency and voted for the alternative.

David Bishop of OH 6:48AM January 11, 2011

Looks like Obama has accomplished more in two years than bush accomplished in eight- unless you count recessions. If only the republicans were concerned about spending during bushes's train wreck. Nothing they did during that fiasco was paid for. The deficit doubled. After everything went bust Obama had to move boldly to prevent a meltdown. It's good to be rid of bush and to have a true leader. Mean spirited low-lifes now whine about the cost. Funny, I didn't hear them complaining when the republicans were squandering and borrowing. They even voted for bush twice. They must have liked it . Hmmm, could republicans be two-faced, or are they so dim they don't recognize the contradiction. Prabably the latter. Oh well, we warned you about bush. Wasn't such a good idea to put a dummy in the white house, was it?

Truth,honor,justice of CO 9:28PM January 02, 2011

How is it courage to vote for all this garbage after the election is over? It would have been courageous, although stupid, to have done this before the election. To do it after is cowardice and malignity. They went back to business as usual once the election was over. That is exactly what we voted against.

Ms. Milligan, one can only wonder how you can make statements that are so totally opposite to reality. I suppose you just want to believe it and so you say it no matter what is true. This is the reason why the Democrats lost so big. No matter how hard we tried to tell them they would not hear it and ever since the election they continue to act like it is not true. They won't believe what is smacking them in the face and neither will you.

Why couldn't they simply vote a continuation of the tax cuts. That was all we wanted this childish congress to do. But no, they had to tamper with Social Security taxes, add an unemployment extension and subsidies for ethanol. They do not know how to do simple and less expensive things.

We no longer can afford for Congress to "get things done" or "help the American people." The less they do the safer we are!

Fredrick Stone of NC 10:30AM January 01, 2011

Susan Milligan

Susan Milligan

Susan Milligan is a political and foreign affairs writer and contributed to a biography of the late Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, "Last Lion: The Fall and Rise of Ted Kennedy." Follow her on Twitter @MilliganSusan.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement