Advice for New Members of Congress: Bring Your Dog to Work

December 27, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (2)

Some unconventional advice for incoming members of Congress in both parties: if you have a well-behaved pet, bring it to the office.

Congress is one of the few workplaces where one can get away with bringing a dog (as most lawmaking pet-owners do) or a cat (not so common--the cats tend to demand their own offices) to the office without being too disruptive. And while the upkeep can be a distraction, the benefits are substantial: senators and congressmen who have their pets in the office are almost uniformly more sanguine--and thus more likely to have a civilized relationship with their colleagues--if there is a tail-wagging, non-judgmental domesticated animal waiting for them then they return from a contentious committee hearing or caucus lunch. Even staffers who don’t much enjoy taking the pup out for a quick pit-stop will attest that the positive impact the pets have on their bosses makes it all worthwhile.

[See photos of the first dog: Bo Obama.]

Christmas week, Washington lost Splash, the gregarious and fiercely loyal Portuguese Water Dog who was a constant companion to the late Sen. Edward M. Kennedy. Splash was a fixture on Capitol Hill (denied access only to the Senate floor--odd, Kennedy noted cheekily in his children’s book, since Splash was often better behaved than some members of the Senate). When lawmakers had to interrupt a hearing to go vote, they came back to find Splash sitting in the chairman’s chair. When Kennedy went through the revolving doors on the second floor of the Capitol, Splash insisted on getting in the same crowded compartment with the senator, unwilling to be separated from his friend. He was there waiting, panting and tail wagging with excitement, when Kennedy would return from a meeting on floor debate. Splash would even make friends on the other side of the aisle, wandering down the balcony outside Kennedy’s office to greet GOP senators meeting in a room that shared the same balcony. True, Splash had it pretty good; he sailed on the Cape and had a nice yard to run in. But unlike so many other Washington figures, Splash had no agenda. He didn’t know Kennedy was a Kennedy or even a senator. He wasn’t trying to get his owner to slip something into the tax bill. Kennedy was just the big guy who loved him and played with him, and that was enough for Splash.

When Kennedy became ill, Splash (along with Sunny, Kennedy’s other Portuguese Water Dog) was there for him, waiting outside the hospital after the Senator’s visits there. Splash himself had bouts with cancer, but interestingly, he didn’t get sick until after Kennedy passed.

Other lawmakers have also brought their pets to the Hill (and some have also since died--Capitol denizens miss the gentle Charlotte, House Democrat Steny Hoyer’s sweet little dog), and everyone benefits. It’s hard to have a fight with someone when a dog is offering unconditional love and loyalty. It’s not the answer to an increasingly partisan Capitol, but it helps.

Tags:
Democratic Party,
pets,
Ted Kennedy,
dogs,
Steny Hoyer,
Congress,
Republican Party

Reader Comments Read all comments (2)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

This is a great blog post Susan. I've been thinking the same thing for a while.

Jessica of DC 9:01AM December 29, 2010

I have a great dog that I value. But I find this article pathetic.

Really? Seriously? An article purporting that social interaction is enhanced by a flea bitted, tail waggers? Your contention is we need more flop ears in Congress.

What's missing in Washington is not pets on display, but rather integrity from our representatives. The hypocricy is unbelievable. Our politicians bloviate about how concerned they are about our nations and its future but then waste their time in gamemanship, pursuing self-interests and re-elections, wineing and dinning special interests, and finding ways to evade their paying taxes.

Who care whether or not a kibble eater patters the halls of congress?! I mean really. They are animals put on earth to serve man. A dog that wags it's tail when it sees its owner does not provide any intrinsic service or value. But then again, someone/something has to love the politician. If not their mother, which is quite telling, then why not a canine?

I'm excedingly concerned about why Senator so and so added millions to the national debt in the form of earmarks, why we feel inclined as a nation to create unfunded entitlement programs, why our politicians politicize our wars for their gain, why government officials think they are uniquely qualified and justified to socially engineer, etc. The list is long and varied and is certainly more important than the innane of whether Fido has a security clearance or not.

I disagree with the premise of the article. I definitely don't want politicians making decisions based on he/she are liked by a dog. Perhaps the dog is the only one that does like them. But then again, what does a dog know. I'm certain Hitler's dog, Blondi, offered unconditional love and loyalty as well!

david of ID 6:11PM December 27, 2010

Susan Milligan

Susan Milligan

Susan Milligan is a political and foreign affairs writer and contributed to a biography of the late Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, "Last Lion: The Fall and Rise of Ted Kennedy." Follow her on Twitter @MilliganSusan.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement