The 2010 Elections' Shocking Numbers: Spending Up, Turnout Down

October 19, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (5)

The sad state of American politics is easily summed up in the alarming comparison of two sets of numbers: one, by the Center for Responsive Politics, and the other, by the Center for the Study of the American Electorate at American University.

Let’s start with the excellent work done by the Center for Responsive Politics, a nonpartisan group that tracks campaign spending. On its home page is a widget that clocks the amount of money spent by candidates, parties, and interest groups on the 2010 elections. At last check, it was more than $3.54 billion--but the amount is moving so quickly that it’s outdated with a bigger number a fraction of a second later. It’s like those neon signs that clock the national debt.

Contrast that with another set of numbers, these ones tallied by the also nonpartisan Center for the Study of the American Electorate, arguably the best source on voting patterns. The Center reported recently that primary turnout on the 2010 midterm elections--the ones characterized by an angry and frustrated American public--was just 17.8 percent of age-eligible citizens. That’s the second-lowest turnout ever, the center reported. Democrats reached a new low; just 8.2 percent of those eligible turned out to vote in the 42 states that had Democratic statewide primaries.

There are legitimate long-term questions about low voter turnout in a country which prides itself as a small-d democratic model for the world. Having elections on weekends, for example, or on a holiday, might get more people to the polls. Early voting and voting by mail are laudable efforts, and could be expanded. But the more baffling question is this: If Americans have such a low opinion of Congress (both parties), why do they give money to candidates or political groups? Why would wealthy candidates spend millions and millions of dollars of their own money for a job that pays a fraction of what some of them made in the private sector?

Money, unfortunately, means a lot in the outcome of campaigns, but there’s one number that trumps it all: the number of votes each candidate receives on Election Day. Americans tell us they are angry, disgusted with politics-as-usual, and worried about the economy and their mortgages. Those voters should put down the checkbook and get to the voting booth.

Tags:
Democratic Party,
2010 Congressional elections,
economy,
Congress,
deficit and national debt,
campaigns,
unemployment,
politics

Reader Comments Read all comments (5)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

We shall prove you wrong ...period!

Lee Strongandstinkyfishburn of CA 10:02PM October 20, 2010

This writer is really bemoaning the lack of enthusiasm for Democ-rat Party primary candidates, and he should. What's the choice in a Democ-rat primary? Two candidates who agree on everything but belong to different grievance groups? All candidates who run as Democ-rats today are McGovernick morons. What's there for a normal American to choose between?

David S. Levine of FL 3:13PM October 20, 2010

Here we are bemoaning the national debt, the unbelievable deficits and the overall poor economy while politicians everywhere are saying if they are voted in, they will spend less. How are they hoping to get voted in? By spending more. A lot more. The whole idea of "I'll spend less in office by buying my way in" is sickening. I agree with you Ms. Milligan - time to put down the checkbook and pick up the ballot.

K. Foss of IL 2:09PM October 20, 2010

Susan Milligan

Susan Milligan

Susan Milligan is a political and foreign affairs writer and contributed to a biography of the late Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, "Last Lion: The Fall and Rise of Ted Kennedy." Follow her on Twitter @MilliganSusan.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Political Enemies: Good vs. Perfect

In politics the perfect is often the enemy of the good.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement