Republican 'Pledge' on the Constitution Is Just Wacky

September 27, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (29)

Of all the promises in the GOP’s “Pledge to America,” the most potentially troublesome is the demand that all legislation include a clause stating exactly how the proposed law is provided for in the U.S. Constitution.

On its face, this sounds reasonable, especially to the element of the Tea Party movement that believes the country’s troubles would ease if we all just got back to what the Founding Fathers envisioned and codified in the Constitution. Set aside, for a moment, the fact that the Founding Fathers were a group of white, wealthy men who hardly represent the pluralistic society America has become (in part because of freedoms derived from interpretations of the Constitution over time). The idea is just wacky.

[See a roundup of editorial cartoons on the Tea Party.]

So the GOP wants a strict reading of the Constitution? Too bad, Air Force. The Constitution only provides for the creation of an Army and a Navy. And--assuming a back-to-basics reading of the Constitution includes all those amendments--how can Congress determine the extent to which the Bill of Rights supersedes other national interests and just common sense? The legal battles over elements of the Patriot Act merely underscore how unclear the lines are. That’s why judges and justices are there.

Congress has been known to try to undo a court decision the ruling party doesn’t like. But this pledge goes a step further, usurping the very role of the judiciary in determining whether laws pass constitutional muster. The separation of powers is one of the most critical elements of our democracy, bringing checks and balances on the power of each branch. The judicial branch can handle the constitutional questions. The legislative branch should stick to legislating.

Tags:
courts,
2010 Congressional elections,
Navy,
Tea Party,
Congress,
Army,
Air Force,
Constitution,
Supreme Court,
Republican Party

Reader Comments Read all comments (29)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I think the article is meant to be an exaggeration. Your comments are just malicious. If you have a point to make fair enough, but putting the boot into someone like that, I mean grow up!

Rob of IA 11:30AM October 05, 2010

Way to reduce an argument to the absurd.

"She is currently a fellow at the Institute of Politics at Harvard University's Kennedy School of Government. "

Do they have any copies of the Constitution there or is it considered "offensive?

Why not start with the 10th amendment? You may of heard of it inbetween reading "Das Kapital" and Mao's Red Book. Here I'll help ,"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." , did that refresh your memory? I particularly like the "..or the People." as that would be ME! Probably doesn't fit the Acedemic run, utopia they preach at Haaaarvard.

To you, the Constitution is a barrier to "perfect" government or a punchline to a joke.To Patriotic Americans it is the Supreme law of the land, something good and just , and worth defending. It also includes a whacky feature that allows it to be "amended" , so IT can change with the times and sensibilities of the CITIZENS (Not just Harvard elite types) and has done so.

I am shocked and dismayed, when Acedemics employ false logic arguments. Did you get your degree by parroting the opinions of your professors , or did you have to spend a little time on your back as well?

Joshua of MA 1:02PM October 03, 2010

This guy is seriously under educated. The oath of office required of all elected federal officials is: "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God. "

The oath of office is to the Constitution.

Yaakovwatkins of CO 12:44AM October 03, 2010

Susan Milligan

Susan Milligan

Susan Milligan is a political and foreign affairs writer and contributed to a biography of the late Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, "Last Lion: The Fall and Rise of Ted Kennedy." Follow her on Twitter @MilliganSusan.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement