2010 Elections’ Female Candidates Render Moot the ‘Women’s Vote'

September 17, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (1)

Women were given the right to vote in America 90 years ago last month, when the 19th Amendment became law. And yet still, female voters are treated as some exotic, monolithic voter group, indicating that females still have a long way to go politically.

Political analysts commonly ponder the impact of the “women’s vote,” curiously choosing females as the gender whose behavior is driven by their reproductive organs. Lumped with various ethnic or racial groups, women, despite being more than half the population, the strong majority of voters (nearly 10 million more women turned out to vote in 2008 than men, according to the Center for the American Woman and Politics at Rutgers University) and the vast majority of Democratic primary voters, still face an early 20th century problem, being treated like a minority interest group.

The writer Alice Duer Miller in 1915 spoofed the notion of women being a bad bet as voters, suggesting some reason men might not be permitted to cast ballot:

  • Because man's place is in the army;
  • Because no really manly man wants to settle any question otherwise than by fighting about it;
  • Because if men should adopt peaceable methods women will no longer look up to them;
  • Because men will lose their charm if they step out of their natural sphere and interest themselves in other matters than feats of arms, uniforms, and drums;
  • Because men are too emotional to vote. Their conduct at baseball games and political conventions shows this, while their innate tendency to appeal to force renders them unfit for government.

This year’s crop of female candidates includes such disparate contenders as a former wrestling executive, a veteran liberal California feminist, a pro-gun centrist upstate New York Democrat, a tough-on-crime former state attorney general, and an upstart Delaware contender who is on an anti-sex mission. Surely there’s enough diversity there to abandon the patronizing notion of a “women’s vote.”

Tags:
Democratic Party,
2010 Congressional elections,
Congress,
female voters

Reader Comments Read all comments (1)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I think most pundits mean "feminist vote". But now even that definition is too broad. Today, about 55% of women are pro-life and share traditional, conservative values. Probably about 30% of women are liberal, but still have a traditional value system on personal/family issues. The remaining 15% are in the Rad-Fem camp and are getting more desperately hissy every year as their power wanes.

This conclusion is not based on a scientific study, but rather through the observation of jaundiced eyes.

R.L. Schaefer of CA 12:40PM September 17, 2010

Susan Milligan

Susan Milligan

Susan Milligan is a political and foreign affairs writer and contributed to a biography of the late Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, "Last Lion: The Fall and Rise of Ted Kennedy." Follow her on Twitter @MilliganSusan.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement