Obama’s Hope Covers Muslims, Middle East, Not Bipartisanship

September 10, 2010 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (16)

What does it say about the state of American politics that President’s Obama’s news conference offered more hope for conciliation between disparate religions and between feuding parties in the Middle East than it did for Democrats and Republicans?

A day before the anniversary of the September 11 attacks, the Internet- and media-accelerated controversy over a stupid plan to burn Korans in Florida appears to have waned. The Gainesville pastor--whom Obama refused to identify by name, smartly denying the pastor the distinction of a presidential mention--now says he’s put the foolish idea on hold. Supposedly, this was because he is in talks to meet with the imam planning a Muslim center for southern Manhattan, a meeting the pastor seems to believe could result in the moving of the Islamic center to another location. Murky details of alleged discussions or meetings suggest that the pastor is simply trying to backpedal without losing face with his (tiny) congregation. But if the event is indeed canceled, it does help communicate a message internationally that the American way is to welcome people of all religions.

[Check out our editorial cartoons on the “ground zero mosque” controversy.]

“They are Americans. We don't differentiate between 'them' and 'us.' It's just us," Obama said.

Then there are the Israelis and the Palestinians, embarking on the latest of negotiations to bring longtime violence and strike to a peaceful end. There are "enormous hurdles." Obama said, but the talks are "a risk worth taking" to achieve peace. Bottom line, the president said, is that "the two parties need each other. That doesn't mean it's going to work. Ultimately it's going to be up to them."

Oh, that the president, or any of us, could be so hopeful about Democrats and Republicans, who are so focused on keeping their own jobs in November’s elections that they can’t agree on how to create new ones for their constituents.

[Read more about unemployment.]

Republicans don’t want to discontinue tax cuts for the wealthiest, arguing that they hurt small business owners. The standoff means that extending tax cuts for the middle class is also in jeopardy--tough for middle-income voters, but political fodder for both parties: Democrats can (and likely will) blame the Republicans for holding the middle class hostage to protect the rich, while the GOP will benefit from playing the helpless minority in a Congress that has failed to extend tax cuts to middle-income voters.

Meanwhile, Obama’s nominations to judicial and other offices are being held up by Senate Republicans for reasons unrelated to the nominations themselves, making harder for Obama to implement his agenda (which may be the point).

Democrats did, this week, score a small victory, getting a single Republican senator to agree to stop a longtime GOP filibuster of a small business investment tax break. It was just one senator, Ohio Republican George Voinovich, and he’s retiring this year--hardly an encouraging sign for bipartisanship going forward.

Tags:
Democratic Party,
George Voinovich,
2010 Congressional elections,
9/11,
Islam,
Congress,
Republican Party,
Middle East,
unemployment,
Israel,
Palestine,
Barack Obama

Reader Comments Read all comments (16)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

How weird to have someone quoting “Independent ”. To each his own. I do judge people by the company they keep.

I guess you are not familiar with the terrain in Afghanistan. If you are so inclined take a peep. Have heard tell before search was upgraded Bill Clinton could have captured/killed Osama Bin Ladin.. Just a little speculation.

David in previous article answered well the issue of WMD. Read with comprehension again if so inclined. Doubt you wish to.

We still have a full house of terrorist in Gitmo today. We killed many out of uniform coward terrorist. Who use women and child to protect them. Bush’s home security stopped many plans to do us harm.

Where is the new foothold Iran has in Iraq.

Bush did much more to prevent terrorism than Bill Clinton. Clinton had his attacks but more important had Monica and cigars.

Bill Hedges of MO 4:58PM September 13, 2010

Independent said it well:

Thinking about 9-11, I can't help think how great it is that after all our military attacks and wars around the world that we were able to capture the man responsible for 9-11. Thank goodness Bush captured Osama Bin Ladin.

Oh wait, whoops we didn't capture him!

That's right we were able to rid the world of weapons of mass destruction instead. Remember when we went to Iraq and captured all the nuclear weapons...

Oh wait, there weren't any weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. No trailers with biological weapon factories. That's right, the reason we went into Iraq was proven false.

At least Iran is weakened...

Oh wait, Iran is stronger. Turns out Bush helped make Iran a stronger country by removing Hussein and giving Iran a foothold in Iraq...

Oh well, so much for 9-11 objectives under BUSH!

Obama's doing better so far!

Bobby Sugar of MA 3:49PM September 13, 2010

A CORDOBA HOUSE would be far safer even on ground zero land than say a Christian church anywhere in Iran. There are 100’s of places of worship for Muslins in NYC alone. How many for Christians in all of Iran ?

Who truly are the real racist ?

Protesters are not saying don’t build. Just not there. In America you have a protest. Would it not be worse in Iran ? A greater sin than say adultery, writing a book, or cartoon about Muslim leader.

In America Muslims can complain but we can not against them.

That is hypocrisy plain and simple…

Bill Hedges of MO 12:52AM September 13, 2010

Susan Milligan

Susan Milligan

Susan Milligan is a political and foreign affairs writer and contributed to a biography of the late Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, "Last Lion: The Fall and Rise of Ted Kennedy." Follow her on Twitter @MilliganSusan.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement