Government Stimulus Needed Because Private Sector Won't Act

September 7, 2010 RSS Feed Print

With record deficits and debt, why should the federal government spend more money--either in the form of infrastructure outlays or tax cuts? Because consumers and the private sector won't.

President Obama faces a tough enough challenge, trying to repair an economy devastated by debt, high unemployment, a burst housing bubble, and sluggish growth. But with the recession lingering, consumers, home buyers and sellers, and employers are engaged in a high-stakes game of economic chicken that is making any recovery slower.

Business leaders blame the hiring drag on an uncertain regulatory environment and high taxes. There may be some truth to that; it's hard to plan for business expansion if you don't know what the new regulatory environment will cost. But the lengthy recession has enabled employers to get more for less, as workers have been forced to accept cuts in pay and benefits along with expanded job responsibilities. Why should employers hire more people if they know they can get by with fewer workers? The only way to create an environment which forces more hiring is to increase demands for goods. But consumers—working for less, or not at all—are limiting their spending, easing pressure on inventories.

Homeowners and would-be buyers are engaged, meanwhile, in their own standoff, with owners stubbornly refusing to accept the fact that their homes are not worth what they'd like. Many bought houses on the risky presumption that their home values would appreciate exponentially, and are reluctant to sell them at lower prices. And while home prices have started to creep back up, sales of existing homes and condos dropped more than 27 percent in July from a year previous. Since home equity loans were a strong supplier of consumer spending during the boom, retail sales take a hit along with the housing market.

Obama's proposal for $50 billion in infrastructure spending may not provide a dramatic enough stimulus to affect the unemployment rate, and the $200 billion in targeted tax cuts to promote business investment may not calm fears enough to spur a big round of hiring. But without a government nudge, the private sector may not do it at all.

Tags:
unemployment,
deficit and national debt,
economy,
economic stimulus,
Barack Obama

Reader Comments Read all comments (13)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Susan Mulligan must have received government entitlements in her past to think that spending money solves problems. Actually throwing money at the problem is fine, except that it is MY MONEY! I wasn't the one who pushed for Zero Down sponsored mortgages to people who were unqualified to buy houses. Barney Frank, and company, all government representatives on a spending spree caused this financial crisis by government decree. Then now Ms Mulligan wants to throw more (of my money) at the problem. My feeling if she feels this way is that she should fork up part of the billions needed to pay for this boondoggle rather than punish the responsible citizens. Its the government, stupid!

DODAVATAR of CA 8:57PM September 08, 2010

You wrote "Government spending is the only thing that can make sure we don't fall into a complete economic collapse within 1 year."

That's the problem with you liberals, you think government is the solution to every problem.

Tell me, genius what government agency gave you your conviction? Social Security? The ponzi scheme that bilks current and future generations to feather the nests of the "disabled and aged?"

Medicare and VA? Cost over runs and pathetic service.

The list could go on and on.

Allow me to appropriately rephrase your comment: "Government spending is the only thing that can make sure the Democrat party won't fall into a complete collapse within 1 year."

david of ID 10:00AM September 08, 2010

Is that what they taught you at Harvard? Sheesh!

Debt can be handled so long as there exists the ability to repay it. We no longer have this ability.

Corporate greed, undeserved bonuses, huge salaries, legacy costs, outsourced jobs, government regulation, unions, Environmentalist dogma, pork barrel politics, open borders and trial lawyers have destroyed our nation's business and industry. We have become a debtor nation - hamstrung, unable to produce, compete or even provide our own energy needs. Nothing more than a shadow of what we once were.

But most importantly, we have lost the personal and political will to change. Greed, sloth, Enviro-Socialism, political correctness and educational indoctrination have destroyed the basic system of American values. Judeo-Christian truths and morality have been replaced by progressive, humanist, relativism.

I do not believe there is anyway to return to our former greatness - we simply lack the necessary strength of character and determination, as a nation, to do what is necessary to regain what has been thrown away.

R.L. Schaefer of CA 11:41PM September 07, 2010

Susan Milligan

Susan Milligan

Susan Milligan is a political and foreign affairs writer and contributed to a biography of the late Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, Last Lion: The Fall and Rise of Ted Kennedy.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Obama's Mixed-Bag Week

The Obama camp can celebrate Dick Lugar defeat, but should worry about the Scott Walker recall.

Mary Kate Cary

Obama Attacks as Economic Cliff Looms

The president can't afford to talk about the economy, but with a 2013 fiscal time bomb approaching, the rest of us can't afford not to.

Latest Video

advertisement