Retiring the Myth of 'Big Labor'

September 3, 2010 RSS Feed Print

As Labor Day approaches, can we finally retire "Big Labor?"

Not the idea, necessarily--just the term, which has long been a stretch of a political term, and now is just absurd.

Let’s look at the numbers: Just 12.3 percent of the overall workforce is unionized, and that’s down slightly from 2008. Overwhelmingly, the union membership is dominated by government workers, 37.4 percent of whom are in organized labor unions. Among full-time, private-sector, wage- and salaried workers, the percentage is just 7.2 percent, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

And despite the fact that many blame the poor economy on the unreasonable demands of labor leaders, things aren’t looking so rosy for workers. Many lost their jobs in this recession, and others have been forced to take pay cuts. Making it even worse is this recent dreary report from the Kaiser Family Foundation and the Health Research & Education Trust, which reports that workers are alone shouldering the burden of increasing health insurance costs. According to the comprehensive report, workers paid on average 14 percent more for health insurance than they did last year, despite the fact that premiums overall went up just 3 percent. The employer share of health insurance costs did not increase.

[Read more about healthcare.]

Since 2005, the worker portion of health insurance costs has gone up 47 percent, while overall premiums increased 27 percent. Wages, meanwhile, went up 18 percent, on average, during the past five years.

It’s true that organized labor can have amplified influence in campaigns, not just because of the contributions the groups make to candidates, but because their members are invaluable in phone banking and get-out-the-vote efforts. But what does that get them? Labor unions’ priority issue, the Employee Free Choice Act making it easier for unions to organize workplaces, is all but dead in Washington. And this is under a Democratic White House and a Democratic-controlled Congress. Labor Day, meanwhile, retains for the moment only its bare-bones impact: a day off.

Tags:
2010 election,
Bureau of Labor Statistics,
Congress,
health insurance,
unions,
healthcare,
labor

Reader Comments Read all comments (15)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Have the unions negotiate with China? Were you dropped on your head repeatedly as a child? The unions do not work for China, and their main negotiation strategy is to threaten to go on strike. Why would that bother China? Do you think they might injure themselves laughing so hard at such an ill-conceived idea?

Before you blame Bush and the republicans for China's economic boom, you might want to see what happened during Clinton's time in office. That's when America's retirement funds starting looking abroad to invest money. They thought they hit on a brilliant idea: invest in a country with low worker wages, add some American technology and know-how, and export goods to the U.S. Of course China robbed them blind, stole America's jobs, and kept Walmart supplied with cheap, shoddy goods. Clinton looked the other way. Maybe it was a coincidence that Clinton was taking money from the Chinese. Maybe not.

And before you blame republicans for driving U.S. companies to invest overseas, you might want to check the main reasons that the companies left:

1) unions.

2) excessive regulation.

3) legal liability.

All three reasons are things that are heavily supported by democrats. Clinton's head of the EPA once tried to ban the chlorine molecule, even though that would set medical care and public health back a few hundred years. Republicans at least pay lip service to tort reform, and they support hard-working Americans, not lazy, worthless unions.

chem E of FL 10:20PM September 07, 2010

Maybe we can have unions negotiate with China since they have some guts instead of the whimpy republicans who give communist countries our jobs, technology, and factories without blinking an eye. Oh boy are we going to pay for handing our power over to the communists! So much for freedom! Good job republicans, China is about to flex their muscles!!!

Independent of MA 9:40PM September 07, 2010

Unions are the main reason American industry is no more.

They are, ironically, the main reason unions are weaker than they were in 1956, the height of their power, and that's a good thing, because with union weakness America can return to preeminence economically.

But, weak as they are, they can and do influence elections generally and Democ-rat primaries particularly. Their phone banks are legend--they call my home in Florida from new york because my wife is a retired teacher. They assess their membership for their political action committees and contribute to the Democ-rats with that cash.

As a result of their influence they, in effect, sit on both sides of the negotiation table. Liberal author Ken Auletta details how this works in his first book about the 1973 New York City fiscal crisis, "The Streets Were Paved With Gold." He shows that the City government was so weak in its dealing with the AFSCME local in New York City that negotiations were held in union headquarters.

So, having finished off American industry, they now have their slights set on Federal, State and local governments.

David S. Levine of FL 4:52PM September 07, 2010

Susan Milligan

Susan Milligan

Susan Milligan is a political and foreign affairs writer and contributed to a biography of the late Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, Last Lion: The Fall and Rise of Ted Kennedy.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Obama's Mixed-Bag Week

The Obama camp can celebrate Dick Lugar defeat, but should worry about the Scott Walker recall.

Mary Kate Cary

Obama Attacks as Economic Cliff Looms

The president can't afford to talk about the economy, but with a 2013 fiscal time bomb approaching, the rest of us can't afford not to.

Latest Video

advertisement