Sexist Shots at Palin, Pelosi Signal New Backlash Against Women

September 2, 2010 RSS Feed Print

It’s comforting that women’s groups are inaugurating ``Name It, Change It,’’ an effort to identify sexist comments in campaign commentary and call out the offenders. It’s also depressing.

One would think, in the 21st Century, when we’ve had a female presidential candidate viable enough to be called the Democratic front-runner before any votes were cast, when we have a female House speaker who has proved to be far tougher than many of her male predecessors, when we have a record number of Republican women running for federal and statewide office, that we’d be past the era of infantile and offensive comments that reduce a female contender to her gender. But instead, we see an alarmingly unabashed bashing of female candidates and officials for their perceived failings not as candidates and officials, but as women.

Who’s watching Sarah Palin’s kids while she’s campaigning and speaking, and what kind of mother is she if her unmarried teenage daughter got pregnant? Has Nancy Pelosi had cosmetic surgery? Is Hillary Clinton “shrill?”

And yes, male candidates are ridiculed for their vanity and bad tempers, but it’s not the same thing. Late night comics might joke about Joe Biden’s hair plugs or John Boehner’s perpetual tan; John McCain might be cited for his testiness. But these are viewed as flaws in the men’s overall image as candidates, while the women are being attacked for falling down on the job of being women--that is, being naturally lovely and complacent.

Arguably, some of the assaults are an outgrowth of a general decline in basic manners and reasonableness in political dialogue; women are hardly the only targets of the anger-mongers. But the fact that the Women’s Campaign Forum Foundation, the Women’s Media Center, and Political Parity have to conduct this exercise at all is a disturbing sign of the new backlash against women in power.

 

Tags:
sexism,
2010 election,
Joseph R. Biden, Jr.,
Nancy Pelosi,
John Boehner,
working women,
Congress,
Hillary Clinton,
John McCain,
Sarah Palin

Reader Comments Read all comments (5)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

The rest of the industrialized nations - many leaders in world business, social issues and politics - are progressing on many fronts. Women are prime ministers, presidents, etc....some long ago....Thatcher, Meir, Ghandi, now several South American countries, Australia, Finland, Germany, etc. (see the link for a more detailed list)

http://www.planetrulers.com/female-leaders/

This country is lagging, and becoming LESS open to women in positions of authority. Disrespecting them, critiquing clothing and make-up instead of content in their messages. Some women also are getting more play because they "look good" - even when their facts and messages are false.

Women make up over half the population of this country. Many are highly educated and have broad experiences that qualify them for higher positions/offics as much as any man. Yet - they still earn 75 to 80cents on the dollar as men. Board rooms are filled with men and a few women - still.

White males have controlled this country, and up until the 20th century - this was not a surprise. Yet the country that supposedly was progressive, a leader, a champion of rights has been unwilling to go the last mile on women sharing that control with men.

During years where the economy was better, White Males felt they could open the doors for women & minorities without hurting their own dominance. When the economy crashed starting in 2007 - White Males still did not feel the impact, so were willing to keep an open mind enough to vote for a Black Male.

As the economy tanked, though, White Males realized that their jobs and financial stability were at risk. Their wives were still working after they had been layed off. The President was Black, and more of the faces they saw in government leadership roles were minorities & women, while they were struggling. Demographics showed that Hispanics and Blacks were voting in larger numbers with a real impact on the outcome.

This new order was counter to all the messages they had gotten from prior generations - that White Males should always be in control. They lashed out - attacking Hispanics, minorities, the President, and formulating a new political movement that talks about taxes, but has a very White Male face. They want their power back, and have manned their pitchforks to get things back to the old way.

Politics in this country is too much about superficial things - Too much campaigning and opinion polls. Too much about demonizing or discrediting and not enough discussion about solutions. White Males get crazy if they are discussed as a group - so maybe they can see why it makes women angry to hear that type of conversation.

We need to focus on ideas, facts, solutions, and less on who is delivering them, or what party they belong to. All this sniping - while the world is passing us by.

DeeToo of SC 11:02AM September 03, 2010

That's it.

Nothing more profound.

Red of NH 10:44AM September 03, 2010

that explains much.

R.L. Schaefer of CA 7:11PM September 02, 2010

Susan Milligan

Susan Milligan

Susan Milligan is a political and foreign affairs writer and contributed to a biography of the late Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, Last Lion: The Fall and Rise of Ted Kennedy.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Obama's Mixed-Bag Week

The Obama camp can celebrate Dick Lugar defeat, but should worry about the Scott Walker recall.

Mary Kate Cary

Obama Attacks as Economic Cliff Looms

The president can't afford to talk about the economy, but with a 2013 fiscal time bomb approaching, the rest of us can't afford not to.

Latest Video

advertisement