U.S.'s Diminishing Influence in the Middle East

September 29, 2011 RSS Feed Print

You can't lose what you never had.

No sooner did an army of dissidents this year peacefully dispatch Hosni Mubarak, a dictator who served at the pleasure of the U.S. government for sustaining an empty peace with Israel despite the human costs of his rule, did militarists in Washington condemn the Obama administration for "losing" Egypt. (They were joined by Israeli Likudniks and corrupt emirs in the Persian Gulf.) Last week, after Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas submitted his bid for statehood with the United Nations, largely out of frustration with the relentless spread of Israeli settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, President Obama was scorned for relinquishing America's leadership role in the Middle East.

[See photos of protests in Egypt.]

This may come as a shock to beltway parochials, but the notion of American pre-eminence in the Middle East has been as illusory as the Arab-Israeli "peace process." Despite its enormous investment in the region—hundreds of billions of dollars doled out to Israel and Egypt as part of the 1978 Camp David Peace Accords while maintaining a huge military presence in the region—America has been treated more to raspberries than obeisance from its Levantine allies. Appeals from the White House for a freeze on Israel's colonial enterprise on Palestinian land have been contemptuously dismissed by Israeli Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu, a man reviled pretty much everywhere but inside the dark manifolds of his ruling coalition and a fungible U.S. Congress. Sanctions and diplomatic isolation have done nothing to restrain Hafez al Assad, the jackal of Damascus, from slaughtering his people. The military-led interim government in post-Mubarak Egypt, like its predecessor a recipient of generous U.S. financial and in-kind aide, has blocked State Department efforts to promote democratic reforms through local NGOs. Even Mubarak routinely thumbed his nose at American hectoring about the urgency for liberalization and basic human rights.

Truth be told, American influence in the Middle East peaked in 1956, when President Dwight Eisenhower ordered Britain, France, and Israel to withdraw from the Suez Canal Zone, having invaded it in a monumentally foolish attempt to subvert Gamal Abdel Nasser, Egypt's strongman and leader of the post-war non-aligned movement. Having thus generated a reservoir of goodwill in the Arab Middle East, the White House promptly squandered it by halting U.S. aide for the Aswan Dam project as punishment for Nasser's Arab nationalist movement, which it perceived as a threat to western interests throughout the region. (The action had the perverse effect of chasing Nasser into Moscow's orbit.) American influence in the Middle East has been waning ever since, though it spiked briefly in 1991, when then-President George H.W. Bush leveraged his successful ousting of Iraqi troops from Kuwait into a three-day Arab-Israeli peace conference in Madrid.

[See a roundup of editorial cartoons about the mideast uprisings.]

Unfortunately, the White House failed to build on the largely symbolic gains achieved at Madrid. The Oslo Accords, signed two years later, made a bad situation worse by Balkanizing the Palestinian territories into Israeli-controlled zones drawn to protect the ever-expanding complex of Jewish settlements. By 1995, when Abbas replaced Yasser Arafat as the Palestinian leader, only forceful pressure by Washington on Israel to freeze and then dismantle its colonial enclaves could have salvaged the peace process as well as America's image in the Middle East. In fact, the settlements expanded as Abbas's credibility diminished. As a senior World Bank representative told me in Jerusalem in February 2007, "Washington and Israel have done a great job of undermining Abbas. This poor sap hasn't been able to deliver a thing."

The sap has risen. For better or for worse, Abbas this week appealed to the United Nations for statehood, setting up the diplomatic "train wreck" the White House labored fiercely to pre-empt. In doing so, he revealed what has been clear in the Arab world for decades: that the image of America as influential arbiter in the Middle East thrives only in the minds of politicians and policymakers in Washington.

Tags:
Palestine,
Binyamin Netanyahu,
Mahmoud Abbas,
Mideast peace,
Israel,
UN,
Egypt

Reader Comments Read all comments (6)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

There are some fundemental false assumptions by the author of this article:

1. Israel had colonial desires - Israel proved over the years that it is probably the biggest opposite of that. Although won all its wars it was willing to give the sinai desert, which is bigger then israel and full of oil, for peace!!! Israel did it again for peace with Jordan!!! Israel withrow from south lebanon and also from gaza in hope to some kind of peace but got two wars in its face. So, is israel a colonial country? Far far from it!

2. U.S troops in the region link to the Israeli-arab despute: huge lie and missliding. No U.S troops in israel, the troops in the gulf are for war on oil which israel has none!!!

3. The problem is in the west bank settelment - Abbas didn't ask for palestinian country in 67 borders. He ask for stop the israeli occupation of the last 63 yeats which mean since the birth of israel!!! Thus the settelments in the west bank are not realy the problem rather the settelment in TEL AVIV and the rest of israel are the problems. Aushwitz, here we come

johny of CA 6:18PM October 01, 2011

Netanyahu's expansioninst policy will never broker peace with the Palestinians (and he knows it he doesn't want peace as bad with all the guns and butter) The downside for USA is our loss of influence and economic interests in the region because the government can't rein in Bibi ( mostly since more of our foreign policy is drafted by Likud rightwing Jews and our House or Armed Services is headed by a Likudist jew as well)

America can strengthen its position and economic influence in the ME by doing 2 things

1) Putting someone more moderate in Israel ( even Israeli's aren't digging Bibi at this point) BIBI HAS GOT TO GO!

2) Cleaning up house in American government in terms of foreign policy and Defense chairs ( way too many zionist jews in strategic positions )

That will protect our economic interest and will force peace between a reluctant Israel and Palestine.

Mike Loveman of DC 9:44PM September 30, 2011

The Two Posters Below Are Islamic Propagandists

Both Christians and Jews predate Muslims in the Middle East.

Palestine was governed by the Jews for centuries before Mohamed's bloody scimitar conquered, converted and enslaved the region.

Further, I make the observation that in Israel Christians and Arabs live peacefully, may, and do, vote and hold public office. This is not the case in Islamic countries where their murder and persecution are daily occurrences.

It took centuries of warfare before Islam was sufficiently bloodied, and finally turned back from its conquest of Europe by the efforts of Catholic Knights at; Rhodes, Malta, LePanto, Vienna and the Reconquista of Spain and Portugal.

Listen to the words of the militant leaders of Islam - most recently at the U.N. - hearing their words is obvious proof of their genocidal hatred of all cultures outside of Islam.

Imadimwacko's rabid speeches echo, and perhaps surpass those of Hitler.

R.L. Schaefer of CA 6:06PM September 29, 2011

Stephen Glain

Stephen Glain

Stephen Glain is a freelance writer with extensive experience as a foreign correspondent in Asia and the Middle East. His latest book, State vs. Defense: The Battle to Define America’s Empire, will be published in August by Crown. You can follow him on Twitter @sglain.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Obama's Mixed-Bag Week

The Obama camp can celebrate Dick Lugar defeat, but should worry about the Scott Walker recall.

Mary Kate Cary

Obama Attacks as Economic Cliff Looms

The president can't afford to talk about the economy, but with a 2013 fiscal time bomb approaching, the rest of us can't afford not to.

Latest Video

advertisement