• Comment (2)

Frank Luntz Is Right About Conservative Cognitive Dissonance

May 1, 2012 RSS Feed Print

Here's a sentence I didn't anticipate writing today: I think pollster Frank Luntz is onto something.

As part of the Washington Post Outlook section's "5 Myths" series, Luntz makes the case that ordinary voters who call themselves "conservative" aren't obsessed with reducing the size of government; don't want to deport illegal immigrants en masse; aren't big fans of Wall Street; want to preserve Medicare and Social Security; and agree with liberals that income inequality is at least problematic.

[See a collection of political cartoons on the budget and deficit.]

Luntz is notionally interested in finding ways for Republicans to make their ideas more palatable to the general public. After all, he is a party "strategist," a focus-group maestro, as much as he is a pollster. And so he dutifully massages his data. Thus: Conservatives "are rallying behind the budget proposed by Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) not simply because it cuts the size of government, but because it cultivates accountability." But of course!

And: "Conservatives want to increase opportunity, giving everyone the freedom and tools to prosper, so that the poor may someday become rich. Liberals want to redistribute income, making the rich—quite simply—less rich."

[Read the U.S. News debate: Will the New Ryan Budget Plan Hurt the GOP in 2012?]

Make no mistake: Luntz is road-testing talking points here. Yet if you ignore the partisan gloss, I think the thrust of Luntz's data paints an accurate picture: Conservative voters suffer from cognitive dissonance. They are less conservative than they think, and they are decidedly less conservative than professional conservatives in Washington. That most Americans, including conservatives, hate big government only in the abstract is a truism of politics. Luntz's data is yet another confirmation of Americans' operational liberalism.

If you're searching for an explanation of why American politics is so dysfunctional, as political scientists Norman Ornstein and Thomas Mann do in a much-discussed piece in the same Outlook section, look no further than Luntz's focus-group participants.

We have two major parties. Only one can govern in the same spirit in which it campaigns.

Tags:
Paul Ryan,
Republican Party,
2012 presidential election,
deficit and national debt,
politics

Reader Comments Read all comments (2)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Hey Bill,

I used to subscribe to this magazine as I used to think the publication more balanced. I check back to see sadly, no.

Wish you were writing instead. Even former Republicans are forced to placate their Democratic puppet masters...the tide that will force this country over the edge of economic collapse...shame really...

Patriot of FL 11:35PM May 06, 2012

SCOTTY’s “5 Myths”...

1. “"conservative" aren't obsessed with reducing the size of government”

This isn’t Reagan time as pointed out. Is close to Newt’s time. Newt, like most anything, must compromise are nothing passes. Newt balanced budget, reduced debt, made government smaller, and got MORE REVENUE by reducing taxes on rich than Clinton got increasing them.

__

“MYTH: Raising taxes in the 1990s caused the boom years of that decade. This proves that raising taxes leads to economic growth."

“FACT: Tax cuts, not tax hikes, caused the boom years of the 1990s. The economy grew modestly after Clinton raised taxes in 1993, but the economy grew even more after Clinton signed the tax cuts that were passed by the Republican-controlled Congress under Newt Gingrich’s leadership in 1997.”

http://www.mtgriffith.com/web_documents/taxcutmyths.htm

__

EVEN DEMOCRAT CONTROLED CONGRESS AND WH HAD DIFFERING VIEWS. After buying votes with PORK, and alterations, bumcare got passed with 4 year + wait for most of its enactment bumcare. LAST DEMOCRAT COMPROMISE WAS __ NO FEDERAL FUNDS __ for abortions. A requirement to get the necessary DEMOCRAT VOTES to get passed.

Democrats “aren't obsessed with” government paying for abortion. MAKES THE PRESENT __ PILL ISSUE __ look political by Democrats. Abortions cost much more than birth control pills.

If interested, might continue...

Bill Hedges of MO 1:41PM May 01, 2012

Scott Galupo

Scott Galupo

Scott Galupo is a Washington-based freelance writer. He formerly worked for House Republican Leader John Boehner, and was a staff writer for The Washington Times.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement