• Comment (9)

The Most Offensive Thing About John Derbyshire's 'Talk' Article

April 12, 2012 RSS Feed Print

I really didn't want to add to the obloquy that's been directed lately at John Derbyshire, the former National Review contributor whose antiblack ravings sparked several days' worth of cyber-outrage. What more is there to say?

But maybe there's room for a bit more. Here goes.

First let me own up to the reasons for my hesitation. My initial reaction, after briefly scanning the offending Taki's Magazine piece, was that Derbyshire was being pilloried for expressing aloud an unspoken suspicion of black strangers in unfamiliar surroundings that is commonplace among many, many nonprejudiced whites.

[Vote: Has Martin Luther King's Dream Been Realized?]

I grew up in a small New Jersey town that borders both Atlantic City and another small bayside town, Pleasantville. A plurality of Atlantic City's population is black and a majority of Pleasantville is black. Atlantic City's crime problem is well-known. And for a city of just 20,000, Pleasantville has an astoundingly high rate of violent crime.

This was reality; you could rue it, but never ignore it. Especially after my friends and I began driving, and could wander freely along our stretch of seaboard, our parents all gave us advice not unlike Derbyshire's: Urban neighborhoods with high concentrations of blacks were not safe and were generally to be avoided. Such advice was not necessarily given so starkly, but it was understood. Derb's "Talk" goes much further than that. As I understand him, he's saying I shouldn't have merely avoided certain neighborhoods; he's saying that I should have avoided groups of black people anywhere I found them—on the beach, at the mall, or in the boardwalk amusement park. To be frank, that's no longer "commonsense"; that's prejudice. 

The Derb Talk is bad enough for what it says. Even worse, it seems to me, is what it doesn't say. As I got older, I began to realize that it was a luxury to be able to avoid bad neighborhoods. I began thinking, What if I had to live in them? Recall this famous admission by the Rev. Jesse Jackson:

There is nothing more painful to me at this stage in my life than to walk down the street and hear footsteps and start thinking about robbery. Then look around and see somebody white and feel relieved.... After all we have been through. Just to think we can't walk down our own streets, how humiliating.

With this mind, it occurs to me that black parents don't just have to inform their teenage sons how they're perceived by police (it was this "Talk" that Derbyshire was reacting to); in a way that white people will never be able to truly understand or appreciate, blacks who live in high-crime areas also must be wary of other blacks.

[Read: Recession Hurt Hispanics, Blacks More Than Whites]

It's this utter lack of imaginative sympathy that I found most offensive in Derbyshire's race-realist salvo. If I were black and had read it, I would have spluttered something along the lines of, You tell your children to conveniently avoid us—you have no idea what it's like to deal with this stuff every day of your life!

Black Americans, the vast majority of whom are law-abiding citizens, don't need to be told they're not living in Disney World. And doing so isn't an example of brave realism. It's just rudeness.

Tags:
Jesse Jackson,
race

Reader Comments Read all comments (9)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

It is late. Pardon my previous lapse of proofreading. My first sentence in my post should have read "...with which this conversation is taking place.."

I couldn't bear to not correct that. Thank you to US news for allowing immediate posting of comments and not requiring a Facebook account to post. You deserve a medal for that alone.

Mathias The Bold of LA 6:24AM April 13, 2012

The timidity which which this conversation is taking is place holds true to form for the typical citizen soldier of political correctness.

Sensibly minded people of Caucasian ancestry can freely admit the reasons why blacks might be driven to violence, and thus should be avoided. Outside of the stultifying bubble of modern day professional journalistic etiquette, such matters are easily understood. I dare say what John Derbyshire wrote is something that most white Americans take as a given, and conduct their lives in accordance with.

But in case it isn't clear enough to some poor deluded soul out there who might happen to be reading these words, as to exactly why it is that so many modern day backs harbor aggression and retain a deep animus towards whites writ large:

Imagine growing up as the descendant of an African slave. Imagine then, to carry the idea further along, being aware that the general opinion of the whites in the country of your birth is that, in spite of all the confusion and anguish brought about by your lot in life as one who has been displaced from his or her true home, that you really ought to just be thankful for not having been born into dire poverty; that is to say, in any of the West African lands from which the slave population was drawn.

Given this ongoing attitude amongst the citizens, especially the more forthright of the White community who are less willing to exercise tact in such matters, and whose attitude is no doubt shared by even the most meager and faithful inside American Christendom, it is not too far of a stretch, I believe, to suggest that there is just cause for lack a of desire to be assimilated. After all, as an African descendant, you are born into a situation in which the glaring and inescapable fact of life is that you are looked upon as an unfortunate scourge and one of life's annoyances that must be endured; especially given that the option of outright deportation has long since been taken off the table. It would most certainly create in you a psychological scar which perhaps might lead to a lack of desire to be completely Westernized. Acknowledging this scar is a necessary first step towards finding a valid explanation for the well known violent trends of black behavior in the generations since emancipation. One must at the very least admit that it is a likely contributor to the feeling of modern day African descendants towards life in America.

Having said all of that, I do not believe that this in any way makes these descendants entitled to the fruits of labor of those who are not presently morally culpable for the wrongs committed by men in times past; stated differently, reparations are not in order.

As regards black on black crime, who can doubt that it is but one of many side effects of the inborn despondency already referred to. The problem will not play itself out, it seems. We are destined to be a land of two disparate peoples for as long as I see on the horizon.

Goodnight.

Mathias The Bold of LA 6:20AM April 13, 2012

Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY White country and ONLY into White countries.

The Netherlands and Belgium are just as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.

Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY White country and ONLY White countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-Whites.

What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?

How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?

And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?

But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the White race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-White.

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.

Jason of KS 11:38PM April 12, 2012

Scott Galupo

Scott Galupo

Scott Galupo is a Washington-based freelance writer. He formerly worked for House Republican Leader John Boehner, and was a staff writer for The Washington Times.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement