• Comment (11)

Mitt Romney Is Winning, But He’s Not 'Winning'

March 7, 2012 RSS Feed Print

After he'd absorbed the reality of Super Tuesday, in early February 2008, former Gov. Mitt Romney concluded he had no path to the GOP presidential nomination. In the CPAC speech where he announced he was dropping out of the race, Romney cited the need for Republican unity in a time of war. The truth was, this "conservatives' conservative" (as he was introduced at the '08 CPAC) could not shake former Gov. Mike Huckabee on his right flank—especially in the all-important Southern states.

Sen. John McCain did not deliver a knockout punch to Mitt Romney on Super Tuesday. He needed Huckabee's help. Nevertheless, it was spun as a clear McCain victory in aggregate. Romney's summary departure and endorsement only intensified McCain's aura of inevitability.

[See a collection of political cartoons on Mitt Romney.]

After 2008's Super Tuesday, with Romney out, Huckabee (having won Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, and Tennessee) went on to defeat McCain in the Kansas caucuses and Louisiana primary. But these were token victories. It was widely understood that Huckabee would drop out once McCain reached the delegate threshold. The McCain campaign was politely letting Huckabee ride in its sidecar.

This was the position Romney hoped to be in after this year's Super Tuesday contests.

He's not.

Romney is racking up delegates. In raw vote count, Romney leads Santorum by about one million. Romney is winning. Yet, just as important, he's not "winning." He seems simultaneously inevitable and locked in a dogfight. He's the front-runner who can't "close the deal."

[Read the U.S. News debate: Can Mitt Romney Close the Deal With Conservatives?]

The next round of primaries this month, in places like Mississippi and Alabama, won't help Romney and may further enliven former Speaker Newt Gingrich's campaign. He has a growing problem with working-class voters. His unfavorability trendline is pointing in the wrong direction.

All this serves to delay the possibility of a "reset"—that moment when Romney can unite the party and turn his attention to President Obama.

Romney adviser Eric Fehrnstrom recently put it this way:

When this primary is over and people have had their heads knocked in by one another, that's just the nature of a hard fought campaign ... We hit the reset button and the campaign begins anew with a different opponent. We'll be able to draw sharp contrasts with the president, and the president alone, not worrying about our competition. It will be a different race at that point, and the numbers will begin again.

This is true. But Romney desperately needs to reach that point sooner rather than later.

Tags:
Rick Santorum,
John McCain,
2012 presidential election,
Newt Gingrich,
Mitt Romney

Reader Comments Read all comments (11)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

I am stunned that no one has commented on the fact that Mitt Romney believes that the dark skinned people of the world are that way because they have been cursed by god. He has said it many times... if you have dark skin color, then you have been cursed thy the lord.

Wake up America... Santorum is no better. He believes that the president should be a christian man that will lead the country according to christian values. The problem is that he is a liar, and a fraud.

I"m frustrated at the dumbassity of the american people as it pertains to politics, but if find cumfort in knowing that president obama will be in office for another 4 years.

WAKE UP AMERICA!!!!!!

Wisdom of LA 8:19AM March 12, 2012

Friend Hedges, you keep dodging the question, what spending cuts do you propose, that can be actually enacted in to law, with no tax increases and/or even more tax cuts, that will balance the budget? I went to Newt.org to see his brilliant ideas, I got a one sentence solution: "Balance the budget by growing the economy, controlling spending, implementing money saving reforms, and replacing destructive policies and regulatory agencies with new approaches." Very short on specifics yes? Most Pubs talk about spending cuts with no specificity because to do the draconian cuts that would be required would be unpalatable to the majority of voters.

bing of AL 6:33PM March 09, 2012

bing of AL

I am not a fan of R. Paul nor Romney but Newt. Tax cuts for rich increase government revenue. CBO ESTIMATES agree with you that it causes debt. Actual CBO numbers show me CORRECT. There is the factor with increased revenue through tax cuts for rich Congress out spends revenue thus added debt. Newt was able to control that.

Here is a relative short link that may help explain this to you:

http://crab.rutgers.edu/~mchugh/taxes/The%20Reagan%20Tax%20Cuts%20Lessons%20for%20Tax%20Reform.htm

Bill Hedges of MO 2:51AM March 09, 2012

Scott Galupo

Scott Galupo

Scott Galupo is a Washington-based freelance writer. He formerly worked for House Republican Leader John Boehner, and was a staff writer for The Washington Times.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Political Enemies: Good vs. Perfect

In politics the perfect is often the enemy of the good.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement