Why an Anti-Romney Alliance Won't Work

Reader Comments
Back to blog

Brief note;
THE REAL AMERICAN REPRESENTATIVE
A true-core patriot presidential candidate is not out there.
The only individual who can and does inspire and infuse energy and emphasis to inflict a fulminant blow to the current anti-constitutional administration (Chicago corrupted founded ....meanning THE OBAMA BAND)
is not running for presidency at present time.
This person is Gov Sarah Palin;.....if she does reconsider to run..., rest asure - everyone out there - that a monumental coast to coast nation-wide movment will be generatred and the fraudulent Obama regime will come to an end in the coming presidential election 2012.
This is the scenario that liberal-dmocrat factions and the classic old school rino-type republicans are extremely afraid of,.....if not monumentally terrororized by.
Input anyone?
Opinions welcome.
Daniel Cabrera
Merrillville,Indiana

Daniel Cabrera of IN 9:56PM January 06, 2012

Yo, hey Mort Zuckerman.
Take a look at the comments your crack team of pro-Romney/pro-Obama opiners are attracting.
Better charge each of them another $10 grand to help keep USN&WR going for another year.
They're paying you right, not you them?

dom youngross of OH 4:25AM January 06, 2012

LESSON OF 2008: McCain instructed his side to keep the fight clean; BH Obama's side did not make the same choice--attacks on McCain's age, his wife's wealth, even his wife's face and their children's paternity continued. The latter strategy worked.
LESSON OF 2011: Gingrich refused to attack; Paul and Romney did not make the same choice--on TV, in video clips posted online and on internet fora, attacks on even his marriage continued. The latter strategy worked.
The Historian should learn from history.

MacCall of NY 4:28PM January 05, 2012

> Whatever momentum
> the Santorum-Gingrich alliance can muster
> will be swallowed up by Huntsman.
Pardon me, but on what basis is that conclusion drawn--because the Ambassador refused to fight in the earlier race which he would have lost even more miserably than Bachmann and Perry?
Or because he arrived ahead; because he has limited funding and barebones organisation; and because of his uncompelling speaking style? But didn't the first two apply to Santorum, who is a far more forceful speaker--why then didn't the Ambassador feel it would have worked for him in Iowa? why then didn't even Santorum get more than a quarter in Iowa?
So if arriving ahead means has limited ability to overcome limited funding and barebones organisation, and forceful speaking style is what makes the difference, what exactly can the Ambassador achieve in NH which Santorum and Gingrich, or even Paul or Perry, cannot accomplish in far greater scale?
The conclusions which this article seeks to draw is void of foundation. Try again.

MacCall of NY 4:20PM January 05, 2012

Revlon of MI
“Sour grapes”
I don’t know about you, but I can only turn the other cheek only so many times. Newt can continue on the high road and lose or fight back. Instead of slamming obuma, Ron P. and Mitt R. went after then leader Newt. I saw one great man Cain fall because of accusations not proof. Still Newt came in 4th in Iowa. Just like McCain.
Newt is still in the game after the $$$ millions of bad campaign ads outside Mitt:
“GALLUP DAILY: GOP Ballot Tracking, Among Republican Registered Voters”
"Mitt Romney"
27
"Newt Gingrich"
19
"Ron Paul"
13
"Rick Santorum"
11
"Rick Perry"
6
http://www.gallup.com/poll/election.aspx
___
You write “Mitt - who is fully electable and fully Presidential”.
Five years of running for office and wins in Iowa by HAND FULL OF VOTES ???:
“ 2007: Romney runs aggressively in Iowa, invests millions, and expects to win."
“2008: Romney ends up with 25.2% of the vote in a six-candidate field."
"2009: Romney launches a four-year presidential campaign."
“2011: Romney runs aggressively in Iowa, invests millions, and expects to win."
“2012: Romney ends up with 24.5% of the vote in a six-candidate field."
“Yes, the votes were tallied and the former one-term governor gets the bragging rights, but therein lies the point: there’s not much for Romney to boast about here. After five years of near-constant campaigning, Romney managed to get fewer votes in Iowa last night than he did in his first campaign. He also picked up the dubious honor of the weakest win in the history of the caucuses — no victor has ever managed to finish first with less than 25% of the vote until last night."
“After spending nearly $4.7 million, most of it towards the very end of the contest, these are not results Romney should be proud of.”
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal/2012_01/santorum_comes_8_votes_short_d034511.php

Bill Hedges of MO 4:11PM January 05, 2012

All Romney has to say now is that, whatever Gingrich throws at him, it is just because he is sour grapes. Gingrich's value system has been fully exposed over these past many weeks and that is why his support base has eroded accordingly. Now, he now needs to get out of the way for the sake of the party and in support of Mitt - who is fully electable and fully Presidential.

Revlon of MI 1:11PM January 05, 2012

No articles on site about obuma so here goes.
Heard yesterday a lot of Countries still in bad shape or getting worse. Banks too. Which banks through Federal Reserve did obuma loan $$$ trillions & $$$ trillions to ?
If they pay back 50 cent on dollar or less on our loans to us, we deserve to know since our credit rating will surely suffer.

Bill Hedges of MO 12:45PM January 05, 2012