• Comment

Distilling Mitt Romney's Position on Immigration

November 30, 2011 RSS Feed Print

Former Gov. Mitt Romney underwent a tough and fair interview with Fox News Channel's Bret Baier.

Romney seemed particularly, well, Romneyesque on immigration.

The confusion stems from the fact that, between 2005 and 2007, Romney gave every indication of supporting something like President Bush's reform proposal: a system whereby illegal immigrants "come out of the shadows" and to the "back of the line" of the citizenship application process.

[Read the U.S. News debate: Is Newt Gingrich Right About Immigration? ]

In 2006, the Associated Press was apparently unclear enough on Romney's position to write this:

Meantime, one of McCain's potential rivals for the GOP nomination, Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, has made it known that he supports the president's immigration position, saying that Republicans who have broken rank with Bush "made a big mistake."

The same year, Romney said, "I don't believe in rounding up 11 million people and forcing them at gunpoint from our country."

[See a collection of political cartoons on immigration.]

He called elements of the Senate bill sponsored by John McCain and Ted Kennedy "reasonable proposals."

As seems undeniable, Romney took a hard line on illegals when he decided to run for president. That much we know. But I'm still trying to suss out how, precisely, he threads the needle. In the interview with Fox's Baier, Romney insisted that illegal immigrants who come forward must park themselves in the "back of the line," behind those who've come here legally.

But this was a central feature of both the Bush plan and McCain-Kennedy plan, which was praised by business types as well as conservative activists like Linda Chavez, Grover Norquist and Jack Kemp.

[Read how the 9/11 terrorist attacks changed immigration.]

The Weekly Standard's Fred Barnes wrote of the Bush plan:

Earned citizenship would permit the 12 million immigrants living illegally in the Unites States to apply for citizenship. They would be required to work for six years, commit no crimes, pay back taxes, and learn English. Then and only then could they get in line to become citizens [emphasis mine], a process that takes five years.

As far as I can tell, Romney found the thinnest of the reeds on which to lean his newfound opposition to the McCain-Kennedy bill: that it would allow immigrants to collect Social Security benefits they'd amassed while working here illegally.

Does Romney really expect anybody to swallow that?

Tags:
immigration reform,
2012 presidential election,
Mitt Romney

Reader Comments

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Scott Galupo

Scott Galupo

Scott Galupo is a Washington-based freelance writer. He formerly worked for House Republican Leader John Boehner, and was a staff writer for The Washington Times.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement