• Comment (7)

Jennifer Rubin's Weird Mitt Romney Loyalty

November 18, 2011 RSS Feed Print

Jeffrey Lord of the American Spectator vents:

We don't do endorsements in this space. To update Douglas MacArthur, we try and focus on conservatism—The Cause, and The Cause and The Cause.

So it is somewhat amusing to see the Washington Post's Officially Liberal-Approved Conservative Jennifer Rubin's constant contortions to package all things Nelson Rockefeller—er—Mitt Romney as the latest in conservative fashion. Mr. Rocke—sorry … Romney may well be the GOP nominee, and if so we wish him well in ending the Obama era.

But to pretend that Rubin's continual swipes at others (Newt Gingrich, Herman Cain, Rick Perry) are anything other than her inability to control a serious case of Establishment-media approved Romneyphilia is not something that will be allowed by her readers.

Amen, brother.

[See a collection of political cartoons on the GOP hopefuls.]

I have my differences with "The Cause." What those differences don't do is drive me into the arms of a contemptible creature like former Gov. Mitt Romney. I suspect that, intellectually, Rubin is more simpatico with The Cause than I am—and yet she shills for the "electable" Romney. (Likewise, she vehemently defended Sarah Palin until the former Alaska governor became a Washington laughingstock.)

Somehow, Rubin has managed to earn herself a reputation as a hardnosed, objective conservative. Take this Politico lovefest, for example:

Rubin, caustic and single-minded, has proven immune to the usual approaches from Perry's staff: She can't be schmoozed, can't be convinced. They respond diligently, if glumly, to emails that arrive in Austin like hostage notes, and often echo or prefigure former Mass. Gov. Mitt Romney's attacks on him.

"It's just very high level saturation bombing from our perspective—we don't know why," said a Perry ally, who said the campaign has given up on swaying her. "It's just duck and cover."

Almost any other reporter, or even partisan blogger, might have pulled a punch on the man who seemed, for a moment, likely to be her party's presidential nominee, and perhaps the next president. But Rubin, 49, who published her first piece of journalism in 2007 after a career doing legal work for Hollywood studios, makes no pretense of either formal neutrality or party loyalty.

Ha!

[See a slide show of the top 10 most hated news commentators.]

I love that "echo or prefigure" line. Which is it—echo or prefigure? My money's on the former. Romney's people whisper, off the record, into the ears of many Beltway reporters, and Rubin can be counted on to deliver the attacks on the record.

Such reporting can be called a lot of things.

Objective isn't one of them.

Tags:
Rick Perry,
2012 presidential election,
Washington Post,
Mitt Romney

Reader Comments Read all comments (7)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Good god, Galupo and Steim: neither of you have a clue as to what

"objective" means, and it shows all too much in your reporting.

Please don't think that everyone here is stupid enough to swallow the myth that your columns are "objective" or "fair" or "right" on the whole - your highly un-fair, un-right, and un-objective biases are blindingly obvious to anyone with half a brain.

junior of DC 9:10PM November 21, 2011

Hi, Jamie --

I think we actually agree. The sense in which I'm using "objective" is closer to your "fair" and "right." It's the pretense of "neutrality" that bothers me about Rubin. That's the critical distinction: journalists can and should always strive to be "objective." They need not be neutral.

Scott Galupo of VA 5:04PM November 21, 2011

I notice you are always posting on columnists. I also notice that you use "objective" as if it's a good thing. News: there is no such thing as "objective," in one's opinion. I worked for 10 years for the BaltSun and know the art of shoeleather reporting. The best journalists - reporters and columnists alike- should strive for "fair" and "right" instead. That is humanly possible.

Jamie Stiehm of DC 1:02PM November 21, 2011

Scott Galupo

Scott Galupo

Scott Galupo is a Washington-based freelance writer. He formerly worked for House Republican Leader John Boehner, and was a staff writer for The Washington Times.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement