• Comment (47)

Obama Wrong on 'Lazy' America--As Are Class Warfare Conservatives

November 15, 2011 RSS Feed Print

Via Jonathan Chait, I see Charles Krauthammer has taken President Obama to task for saying the United States has been "lazy" about "attracting new businesses into America."

Chait says Obama, in context, was referring to American policymakers, and not impugning Americans' work ethic.

Maybe.

[Check out our editorial cartoons on President Obama.]

But Obama has walked down this path before. Remember his remark to an Orlando television station in September?

The way I think about it is, this is a great, great country that had gotten a little soft and we didn't have that same competitive edge that we needed over the last couple of decades ... We need to get back on track.

This was a terrifically dumb and unseemly thing for a president of the United States to say; it fatally undercuts the message he's been trying to convey since assuming office: that average Americans are "doing the right thing," but politicians in Washington are laggards.

As much as I can't stand hearing such talk from the president, it pains me even more to hear it coming from the right. When conservatives talk this way, they're not just misspeaking; they're revealing a rotten core philosophy.

Listen to the dough-faced fanatic Marco Rubio, from his much-praised speech at the Reagan Library:

[The welfare state] was a vision crafted in the 20th century by our leaders and though it was well intentioned, it was doomed to fail from the start. It was doomed to fail from the start first and foremost because it forgot that the strength of our nation begins with its people and that these programs actually weakened us as a people [emphasis mine].

"Weakened us as a people." I have a shorter version of that:

[See a collection of political cartoons on the economy.]

Soft.

Lazy.

That some, if not most, Americans have gone "soft" undergirds the self-dramatizing, self-congratulating "We Are the 53 Percent" movement. It's the inspiration for what I call Reverse Class Warfare.

In the Tea Party era, the sentiment is as perverse as it is widespread.

Sadly, there's no one on the right of Krauthammer's stature who will challenge it.

Tags:
Barack Obama,
Marco Rubio

Reader Comments Read all comments (47)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Bill,

Come on; you're talking apples and oranges.

This is as elementary Budget 101 as it gets. There's a difference between annual deficits and the accumulation we call the National Debt.

http://www.afn.org/~concord/coalition/debtdef.htm

The annual deficits briefly turned into surpluses in the late-'90s. That's just a fact.

Scott Galupo of VA 5:10PM November 17, 2011

Scott

Did you read my comment ???:

"You can not have surplus when you have National debt which passed $$$ 15 trillion recently. Counting shortfall in entitlements promises of perhaps another $$$ 100 trillion. WHAT SURPLUS ???"

Bill Hedges of MO 4:52PM November 17, 2011

Bush had no surplus?

What?!

Here is is, in his own words, at a Joint Session of Congress in 2001:

"You see, the growing surplus exists because taxes are too high and Government is charging more than it needs. The people of America have been overcharged, and on their behalf, I am here asking for a refund."

http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=29643#axzz1dzRlGGPT

I really can't put the case more plainly than that.

Scott Galupo of VA 4:14PM November 17, 2011

Scott Galupo

Scott Galupo

Scott Galupo is a Washington-based freelance writer. He formerly worked for House Republican Leader John Boehner, and was a staff writer for The Washington Times.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

Political Enemies: Good vs. Perfect

In politics the perfect is often the enemy of the good.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement