• Comment (5)

Present George Will Agrees with Past George Will, For Once

October 29, 2011 RSS Feed Print

George Will's Sunday column is making the rounds even before the weekend starts.

It's pretty merciless toward former Massachusetts Gov. Romney:

Romney, supposedly the Republican most electable next November, is a recidivist reviser of his principles who is not only becoming less electable, he might damage GOP chances of capturing the Senate: Republican successes down the ticket will depend on the energies of the tea party and other conservatives, who will be deflated by a nominee whose blurry profile in caution communicates only calculated trimming. Republicans may have found their Michael Dukakis, a technocratic Massachusetts governor who takes his bearings from "data" ... Has conservatism come so far, surmounting so many obstacles, to settle, at a moment of economic crisis, for THIS?

What caught my eye were the scare quotes around "data." I realize Will is a climate-change denier, but I've never known him to be the sort of obscurantist conservative who scoffs at expertise as a rule. I thought, in other words, that I had grist for another requiem for the Old George Will.

[See a collection of political cartoons on climate change.]

Yet on reflection—darn it—I don't think it'd be fair to Will in this case.

Will's take on the idea of technocracy is complicated. It's not that he mistrusts experts. After all, his columns are occasionally full of economic and social-science data. Rather, Will thinks these things shouldn't necessarily be dispositive when it comes to governing.

The technocrat, in his own way, is simpleminded.

[Check out a roundup of editorial cartoons on the economy.]

Here's Will in June 1976:

[T]here have been changes in the theory and, hence, the practice of American democracy. The changes began with the "Jacksonian revolution" in democratic thinking.

In his first message to Congress, in 1829, President Andrew Jackson said: "The duties of all public offices are, or at least admit of being made, so plain and simple that men of intelligence may readily qualify themselves for their performance."

The duties of public office are "plain and simple" only if government problems are only problems of administrative technique. But such a simpleminded conception of politics is blind to the political virtues of judgment, prudence and courage.

I hereby call off the dogs.

Tags:
George Will,
Mitt Romney

Reader Comments Read all comments (5)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Funny that Galupo would believe that all data is generated by real, honest-to-god experts, and can't deduce that "data" may indeed be generated by "experts" - eg - less-than-authoritative information generated by less-than-authoritative "authorities".

Of course, that would mean that he would have to then admit that he himself is a "journalist" and not a journalist.

junior of DC 10:59PM October 31, 2011

George Will is responsible for more flowery right wing nonsense in his op-ed pieces than a gardening club of ex-Tea Party grandmothers.

Phil Esteen of TX 8:46AM October 31, 2011

I think you're misidentifying the source of Will's scare quotes.

Some people mistrust "experts" for class-based reasons or for anti-intellectual reasons. That would be one reason a writer might employ such scare quotes.

But another person might discount the value of "experts" in situations where they have decided as a matter of principle to take no particular action. For example, it would require extraordinary expertise and mastery of policy wonkery for someone to become an "expert" on all competing plans for state control of health insurance and health care delivery. A person who wanted to be such an expert would need to come to grips with a lot of "data". But if I've decided in advance for reasons of principle that I don't want state control of health insurance and health care delivery, all of that data and all of that expertise is utterly valueless to me. The value of that "expert" to me is actually worse than nil, it's negative - having attained such expertise, he's likely to now want to use it, and I don't want him to use it.

Now, which type of scare quotes do you think Will was using?

T Brookside of VT 7:52AM October 31, 2011

Scott Galupo

Scott Galupo

Scott Galupo is a Washington-based freelance writer. He formerly worked for House Republican Leader John Boehner, and was a staff writer for The Washington Times.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement