• Comment (3)

Imagining Mitt Romney Economics in Action

October 27, 2011 RSS Feed Print

So, Scott. You complain a lot about the staleness and rigidity of conservative economic orthodoxy. What's your problem, then, with Mitt Romney? Isn't he just the type of slippery character who will ditch the pandering on January 21, 2013, and govern like a problem-solver?

Maybe. But that scenario creates new problems of its own. It'd be like going from the frying pan to the fire.

How so?

All right. Let's stipulate that Romney is a smart cookie. He looks at the data. He sees that even if GDP grows at a healthy 3.6 percent for the first three years of his term, we won't reach full employment until 2017—that is, after his re-election campaign.

[Check out a roundup of editorial cartoons on the economy.]

Even if thinks he can ride that positive trajectory to a second term, he's going to want to be more aggressive about goosing employment numbers. He's not going to leave his presidency at the mercy of optimistic CBO projections.

So what are you saying?

I'm saying there's a better-than-average chance that President Romney is going to conclude he needs a stimulus bill out of Congress, both of whose houses may be controlled by his party in 2013.

If and when that happens, he's going to run into problems with his base and hardline conservatives in Congress.

[See an opinion slide show of 10 wasteful stimulus projects.]

Already, we can see that if Romney's the guy, he's going to be on a short leash. Not many Republicans really and truly like him, which means he's not exactly going to be staked with a ton of political capital when he gets in. And if he asks for a stimulus, he's going to confirm the party's worst fears about him: that he's a flip-flopping, no-good RINO (Republican In Name Only). Almost immediately, his presidency will be weakened.

Wait a minute. You've got to admit Romney's not just smart; he's clever too. This is a guy who spent a good chunk of his political career distancing himself from the legacy of Ronald Reagan. If he ends up becoming president—in this supercharged ideological climate—you'd have to concede he knows how to play this game pretty well.

Yeah, okay, so what are you saying?

I'm saying Romney and his political team will come up with a palatable new brand. They're not going to be dumb enough to call it a “stimulus.” They'll call it the Supply-Side-Entrepreneur-von-Hayek Mises Recovery Act or something like that. They'll emphasize the tax cuts instead of the infrastructure spending. Heck, you know they're going to throw the balanced budget amendment in there, too.

[Read 10 Things You Didn’t Know About the Bush Tax Cuts.]

And everyone will go along? The opposition to stimulus is just going to melt away?

Maybe.

If that ends up being the case, then a lot of people are going to have to apologize for singling out Mitt Romney's slipperiness.

Tags:
economy,
2012 presidential election,
economic stimulus,
unemployment,
politics,
Mitt Romney

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Brucetee_ Either blow your nose or breathe through your mouth. Lack of oxygen to your brain is distorting your thought process. But then, you are a liberal. Unlike Clinton, you have not learned Newt was correct. Even barry said not the time to raise taxes (at least once, but then forgot).

Yeah, you have GOOD REASON to believe in 2nd term with air reaching your brain.

1. berry has every advantage afforded him as President of the United States, yet you say “much can happen in a year”. What a revolting situation for the President of the United States to be in. Then he got elected President complaining of Bush record. Barry's record is even WORSE !!! Downward spiral of obma gives little hope. Go to the right brucetee___ Take another personal poll___:

1.brucetee says “no president running for a 2nd term has faced such an unappealing and uninspiring field of challenger;s”. Is as correct as your puntuation.

That's a little liberal funny ha-ha:

“Gallup: yeah, pretty much anybody could beat Obama right now"

http://poorrichardsnews.com/post/11437191520/gallup-yeah-pretty-much-anybody-could-beat-obama

“Steve Jobs told Obama: ‘You’re headed for a one-term presidency’”

http://macdailynews.com/2011/10/20/steve-jobs-told-obama-youre-headed-for-a-one-term-presidency/

“Obama Approval Falls To New Quarterly Low”

10/21/11

“President Obama's approval rating sunk to a new low for the 11th quarter of his presidency, according to Gallup's daily polling of public opinion over the course of his presidency.”

“According to the new Gallup release, Obama's approval rating over the course of the 11th quarter was 41 percent. Obama's approval rating in the 10th quarter of his presidency was 46.8 percent, according to Gallup”

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/10/21/obama-approval-falls-to-n_n_1024116.html

Bill Hedges of MO 2:48AM October 28, 2011

no president running for a 2nd term has faced such an unappealing and uninspiring field of challenger;s.

much can happen in a year.

bruce b of NV 11:33PM October 27, 2011

We do not have to imagine barry's economics. No President has been given 2nd term with obama's numbers in unemployment, etc...

Bill Hedges of MO 9:21PM October 27, 2011

Scott Galupo

Scott Galupo

Scott Galupo is a Washington-based freelance writer. He formerly worked for House Republican Leader John Boehner, and was a staff writer for The Washington Times.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement