• Comment (18)

Republicans Are Best Hope for Entitlement Reform

October 11, 2011 RSS Feed Print

To David Frum's thoughtful reply to my question about his partisan status, I'd like to add the following:

I'm not voting for Obama, either.

Looking back at the past three years, I think much of my frustration has stemmed from the fact that our two biggest problems—long-term unemployment and massive public debt—blew up at the same time.

[See a collection of political cartoons on the budget and deficit.]

The debt problem was exacerbated by the collapse of the economy, to be sure, but in no other respect are the two problems related. The crash in the financial markets was driven by a combination of insane lending, irresponsible borrowing, and derivatives-market chicanery. The entitlement/healthcare-spending crunch was a slow-brewing storm that was going to happen, in one form or another, even if the crash of 2008 never happened.

But since both problems came to a head at the same time, they became a catch-all political indictment. Call it the Conflation of the Messes: We got into a hole because we spent too much and borrowed too much—and the only way out of it is to spend less and borrow less.

In the short term, this simply isn't true.

At the risk of crude analogizing, we've been like an alcoholic who lives in a house with a termite infestation. We need both a twelve-step program—some combination of stimulus and, even more so, de-leveraging of household debt—and we need an exterminator, i.e. an entitlement overhaul. The Republican solution has been to try to cure the termites with Alcoholics Anonymous.

[See a collection of political cartoons on the economy.]

Yet I don't kid myself: If it weren't for sheer political desperation, I don't believe for a second that Barack Obama would have entertained serious entitlement reform. He was brought to that table because Republicans, to their credit, dragged him there.

Did they walk away from that table?

Perhaps.

But remember, when the "grand bargain" talks failed, congressional Democrats were on the outside looking in. My guess is, resistance to pruning Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security would have faced stiff resistance among rank-and-file Democrats.

If and when we get to the other side of this stalled economy, I think Republicans are the only party that's philosophically equipped to handle the termite problem.

Tags:
social security,
Republican Party,
deficit and national debt,
Medicaid

Reader Comments Read all comments (18)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Hiya! Exce llent blog! I?m a ordinary website visitor (even more like addict ) of the website sadly I had a concern. I?m just absolutely not certain if it is the right web site to ask, but you?ve got no spam comments. I receive comments on a daily basis. Would you help me? Thanks much!

female esscorts of FL 2:14AM May 19, 2013

Exactly where could I find this particular Weblog platform FOR www.usnews.com ?

testosterone of AL 11:35AM January 19, 2012

Through these past, several months, I have wondered why so many put their faith in the Congressional Budget Office, while others within the Government do not rely strictly on the CBO for accurate information. The following articles may explain why the CBO has good intentions, but finds it necessary to recalculate three to four times before they come to a decision--and even that decision may not end up to be accurate:

Congressional Budget Office Often Guesses Big Changes:

http://capitalgainsandgames.com/blog/stan-collender/1128/cbo-often-guesses-big-changes

Center for Economic and Policy Research and CBO's Assessments:

http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/social-security-monitor/

(many articles related to S.S. and the CB)).

It is interesting to note the particular article, written by Dean Baker and titled: Letter to Rep. Coffman on Social Security Comments,"-- an article on S.S. as a "Ponzie Scheme." The following article: Letter to Rep. Ryan: "Social Security Is Not a 'Ponzi Scheme," and CBO's opinions on Social Security: "Legislation by Sen. Hutchison Would Cut Social Security Benefits for Near-Retirees." The CBO is often not quoted correctly, or is quoted before or after CBO has changed its mind about the budget statistics they present from one period of time to another.

For those who "put their faith" in the accuracy of the CBO, it is probably best to take their statistics with a grain of salt and check back with them every now and then to see if the CBO has "rethought" their previous information. Sometimes they are accurate--sometimes, "way off." They have good intentions, however.

By the way, the Website below is another good site to monitor every now and then.

http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/social-security-monitor/

More on the CBO:

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2010/03/18/do-these-numbers-add-up.html

"OMB and CBO Hold Outdated and Inaccurate Views of SCSEP:

Views from the Senior Community Service Employment Program (SCSEP) also gives info on the CBO (among many other Websites), and this pdf. article is titled: "Updating the Federal Government's Official Assessment of the Senior Community Service Employment Program."

ann keenan of MI 12:40AM October 26, 2011

Scott Galupo

Scott Galupo

Scott Galupo is a Washington-based freelance writer. He formerly worked for House Republican Leader John Boehner, and was a staff writer for The Washington Times.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement