The Deeply Crazy in Virginia's Obamacare Lawsuit

August 19, 2011 RSS Feed Print

As my Philadelphia Phillies idled through a two-hour rain delay Thursday night, I curled up with some light reading: a Texas Review of Law & Politics article by the legal team, led by Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli, that's challenging the new healthcare individual mandate in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.

It's fascinating stuff.

Cuccinelli and co. follow a long trail from the 18th century British jurist William Blackstone to the Dred Scott case to the New Deal to the present day. The conservative team, at first, makes a tight, prudential case against the Obamacare mandate that I, in my nonprofessional capacity, happen to favor. [See photos of healthcare reform protests.]

In their words:

No existing case needs to be overruled and no existing doctrine needs to be curtailed or expanded for Virginia to prevail on the merits. Nor does Virginia remotely suggest that the United States lacks the power to erect a system of national healthcare. Virginia expressly pled that Congress has the authority to act under the taxing and spending powers as it did with respect to Social Security and Medicare, but that Congress in this instance lacked the political capital and will to do so. No challenge has been mounted by Virginia to the vast sweep and scope of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA). Instead, only the mandate and penalty were challenged because the claimed power is tantamount to a national police power inasmuch as it lacks principled limits.

In plainer, get-to-the-point English: We grant you the social safety net established under the "Roosevelt Settlement." We recognize Congress's power to regulate interstate commerce. We even grant that this power could conceivably deliver universal healthcare. But for Pete's sake, don't try to include "inactivity"—that is, not buying a health insurance plan on the private market—under its purview.

Because, once you regulate the act of doing nothing, what's left to regulate?

Er, nothing.

Thus, does the state's power to tax and police become theoretically unlimited?

But, later in the body of the piece, Team Cuccinelli begins to play other, more presently familiar cards. Glenn Beck fans will recognize the faces in the rogue's gallery: Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, progressive philosopher John Dewey, and others who, this argument goes, created the post-New Deal legal and philosophical edifice. [Check out our editorial cartoons on healthcare.]

Wouldn't you know it, this welfare-state stuff constitutes a violation of natural law—which, ipso facto, means economic laissez-faire—and a lurch into moral chaos. Echoing the newly popular Hayek, Cuccinelli's article asserts the primacy of economic rights while characterizing as relativistic the not-exclusively-liberal jurisprudential argument that personhood and dignity precede the marketplace. (Last I checked, I've never seen an unborn baby sign a contract.)

Come conclusion time, the piece sounds eerily like it's not merely advocating the curtailment of an otherwise defensible attempt to advance the national interest, but rather like a full-throated libertarian manifesto:

The Progressive Meliorists had argued that they should be accorded constitutional space in which to make a social experiment, agreeing in turn to be judged by the results. The New Dealers carried the experiment forward. Seventy years later, results are in suggesting that the experiment is living beyond its means. The statist heirs to the experiment say that it cannot and must not be curtailed, so now they claim this new power.

Social Security and Medicare—an experiment! Just a temporary, 70-year blip on the radar!

So, in 46 pages, we proceed from modest and reasonable to deeply crazy. [See our slideshow: 10 Winners in the Healthcare Debate.]

It behooves us to ask, what's Cuccinelli's endgame?

I think we've seen this movie before.

Tags:
Virginia,
healthcare,
Obama administration,
healthcare reform

Reader Comments Read all comments (10)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Obama doubles down. He believes government is the solution to all problems, from jobs, health care, medicare etc. Clueless. Govt intervention is a part of the problem.

www.mymedicareadvisor.com

Allen Heffler of PA 11:36AM August 28, 2011

Re-writing history brucetee ? Taming down the insults ? Check the lanuage change.

"mr. cuccinelli's ego driven goal,it seems,is led by his desire to keep his name in the public spotlight,should he want to seek higher public office".

"Ego driven, seems, lead by, desire, public spotlight ". brucetee MIND can certainly create (no need to prove). Why don't I insert this colorful language in my comments ? COMMAN decency !!! I swear he thinks he can READ MY MIND. What a marvel...

Bill Hedges of MO 7:30AM August 23, 2011

hey bill,there was no insult,so theres nothing to "tame down".this does get cuccinelli's name in the press.as for his desire to seek higher public office.who knows?

bottom line,the hight court will settle the healthcare matter in due time.

bruce b of NV 12:25AM August 23, 2011

Scott Galupo

Scott Galupo

Scott Galupo is a Washington-based freelance writer. He formerly worked for House Republican Leader John Boehner, and was a staff writer for The Washington Times.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

The GOP Finally Finds Its Soul Mate

The rise of Rick Santorum coincides with the return of culture war.

Mary Kate Cary

Obama’s War on Religion

The uproar over the Obamacare contraception mandate is about more than just birth control and Catholics

Latest Video

advertisement