The GOP's Lost Debt Ceiling Opportunity

July 29, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (4)

As we teeter closer to the edge of "Debtmageddon," it's worth pausing to recall the "grand bargain" between Republicans and the White House—the Deal that Almost Was

With no increases in individual tax rates and three dollars in cuts for every new dollar in revenue, could the House have swallowed it?

It's a question that answers itself: If House leaders are having difficulty pressing through a standalone Republican bill, a "grand bargain" never had a snowball's chance in the Sahara.

Sensing this, a new strategy unfolded: reframe the debt ceiling debate in terms of scoring a political victory against Democrats.

[Check out our cartoons on the federal budget and the deficit.]

This had potent visceral appeal. It won over superstar pundits like Charles Krauthammer as well as rank midlevel propagandists such as Jennifer Rubin ("the left will be demoralized"), Pete Wehner ("Obama Will Be Biggest Loser"), and Marc Thiessen ("a modest victory for Republicans, but a major defeat for Obama").

It almost worked—and it may yet.

But think of what might have been if commonsense prevailed over politics. What if these conservative commentators had spent this energy encouraging a compromise that would have benefited the White House, yes, but also would have gored the sacred cows of the left and yielded significant debt reduction as well as a relatively smaller government?

[Check out our cartoons on the GOP.]

Instead, they're left scrambling at the eleventh hour to isolate the "suicide bombers," who now hold all the cards. They could have been isolated weeks ago.

It would've necessitated compromising with Democrats, to be sure. But we're learning—the hard way—that this was always going to require compromise with Democrats.

Tags:
Democratic Party,
House of Representatives,
debt,
Republican Party,
deficit and national debt,
politics,
White House

Reader Comments Read all comments (4)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

" Here’s Reid on December 8, 2010":

"Reid also said that he would like to push off raising the debt ceiling until next year — when Republicans control the House, but that he has not discussed the matter yet with his caucus."

“Let the Republicans have some buy-in on the debt. They’re going to have a majority in the House,” said Reid. “I don’t think it should be when we have a heavily Democratic Senate, heavily Democratic House and a Democratic president.”

"This has to rank very highly in the annals of tactical own-goals. As Ezra explains":

"The election was over. Nancy Pelosi was still speaker of the House. Harry Reid still had 59 Democrats in the Senate. The Bush tax cuts were expiring. And Democrats had a perfectly popular and intuitive position: Extend the cuts for the middle class but, in a time of deficits and sacrifice, sunset the cuts for the rich."

"Republicans, of course, didn’t want to allow the Bush tax cuts for the rich to expire. They were, in fact, desperate to preserve them. Which meant Democrats had the leverage"

http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2011/07/26/how-harry-reid-caused-the-debt-ceiling-debacle

Bill Hedges of MO 2:21AM July 30, 2011

obamacare took A WHOE LOT OF PORK to pass.

Those bad TEA. ALL THEIR FAULT !!!

Bill Hedges of MO 2:37PM July 29, 2011

Everyone wants to blame someone well here is where you start.

http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2011/07/26/how-harry-reid-caused-the-debt-ceiling-debacle/

I say this again, raising the debt ceiling without any plan on how to even try to get our financial house in order will do absolutely nothing to help the markets or the economy.

We are a spoiled nation and if we don't agree to some sacrifice it will be forced on us. We can't have everything we have been getting and not expect to pay more taxes, so we have a simple choice, reduce spending or raise taxes, that’s it. When we reduce spending people are going to get less, if we raise taxes people are going to have less. Bottom-line we are going to have less. Now we can raise taxes and pay more for everything we purchase, but we could increase all taxes by 50% and we would still be $600 Billion in the hole according to a professor at U of Maryland, so that’s not the answer. No one can tell me that the money is not there, sure we may not know how fast a shrimp can run or the effects homosexuality has on a man’s body, but who cares. This is just two example of recent news reports how many more are there? $500k here, a million there, it’s really not the much to worry about until you multiply it by a thousand different programs we are funding.

Wake up and think people. We the pot is empty.

Larry of CA 1:58PM July 29, 2011

Scott Galupo

Scott Galupo

Scott Galupo is a Washington-based freelance writer. He formerly worked for House Republican Leader John Boehner, and was a staff writer for The Washington Times.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement