The Naked Case for GOP Debt Ceiling Thuggery

June 28, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (13)

There are times when Washington hackery is so flagrantly, well, hackish, the mind reels.

Marc Thiessen has evidently expanded his affinity for torture into the economic as well as national security realm. In this Washington Post column, Thiessen all but dares the GOP congressional leadership to break bad with the White House: Cough up everything we want, or the economy loses a testicle.

[Vote now: Will there be a debt ceiling deal?]

Thiessen is so far removed from reality that he seems to have persuaded himself that this style of negotiation is actually an act of mercy:

President Obama does not have the luxury of letting the debt-limit talks fail and then blaming the GOP for a government default. If the dire predictions of his treasury secretary are to be believed, the consequences of a default would be so calamitous that Obama cannot allow it to happen. He must sign whatever debt-limit increase Republicans give him.

This kind of ideological thuggery is one thing; the underlying rationale Thiessen offers in its defense is a thing of beauty:

Let’s be clear: Compromise here isn’t spending cuts for a tax increase; compromise is spending cuts for a debt-limit increase. Republicans elected in the Tea Party wave of 2010 campaigned on a promise to reduce the national debt. They are now being asked to turn around a half a year later and vote to raise the national debt.

[See a collection of political cartoons on the budget and deficit.]

Got that? Agreeing to a debt increase is a compromise, not a mutual necessity of statesmanship. Try that with your credit card company or the bank that holds your mortgage: “I’m doing you a favor by meeting my payment deadlines. What are you going to do for me? Nothing? Well, here comes my car through your front window, pal.”

If the GOP listens to this fool, the country will suffer. [See a slide show of 6 consequences if the debt ceiling isn't raised.]

The debt limit has become a partisan cudgel when, really, it is a collective responsibility—not merely the federal government’s, but the country’s. This is not one administration’s “spending spree coming home to roost,” as Douglas Holtz-Eakin, who is normally sane, put it in National Review Online. This is more than 30 years of national overconsumption and underproduction coming to roost.

It’s time for all of us to start paying the proverbial piper. Increasing the debt limit is just the beginning of a long climb out of a deep hole.

Tags:
politics,
deficit and national debt,
national security terrorism and the military,
unemployment,
White House,
Republican Party

Reader Comments Read all comments (13)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

kelley of in.i concur with your assessment of the ryan plan and the havoc it would cause were it to ever be enacted.it has been so poorly received by the people,that even members of his own party got their track shoes on to run away from this turkey.

there are still a few die hards like the "monotonous poster"who are trying to convince themselves, and others,that giving up medicare,as we know it,and letting seniors deal directly with the insurance companies will be in their best interest.for anyone who believes that i have some real nice ocean front property,here in vegas that they might be interested in.

bruce b of NV 6:03AM June 30, 2011

A quote from the Times today by a Greek Legislator who just crossed party lines to do the right thing:

"Elsa Papadimitriou, a legislator from New Democracy, voted for the measures. Breaking ranks with her party and declaring herself an independent, Ms. Papadimitriou said she hoped that the government would not disappoint her, calling her vote “the most difficult but valuable decision of my political career.”

“There is only one act of patriotism: consensus and cooperation,” she said. “Fiscal suicide is not an alternative.”

Fiscal prudence over ideology. Lets figure it out before Greece is watching the streets of USA on the BBC

Thank you

BSHEA

BSHEA of CT 10:54AM June 29, 2011

It must be quite difficult for President Obama to discuss fiscal prudence with the Republican Party who displayed a complete lack of fiscal prudence for 8 years when in power. The Republican party probably recognizes that fact as they have injected political ideology into the conversation; attempting to diguise it as fiscal prudence.

Spending cuts must be made so that all share in the pain and tax increases must be part of any deal to achieve fiscal prudence.

Of course I am talking fiscally, not ideologically.

Thank you

BSHEA

BSHEA of CT 10:17AM June 29, 2011

Scott Galupo

Scott Galupo

Scott Galupo is a Washington-based freelance writer. He formerly worked for House Republican Leader John Boehner, and was a staff writer for The Washington Times.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

JFK's Virtuoso Turn at the Bully Pulpit

Kennedy presented a radical idea: Peaceful coexistence.

Mary Kate Cary

Calling Terrorism What It Is

Refusing to call terrorism by its name helps no one.

Latest Videos

advertisement