GOP Debate Solidifies Romney's Frontrunner Status

June 14, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (18)

In the run-up to last night’s Republican presidential debate in New Hampshire, Newt Gingrich’s campaign ended in everything but name.

Tim Pawlenty, meanwhile, unsuccessfully attempted to become a frontline candidate. His economic plan earned howls of derision from mainstream economists, left and right, and was taken seriously only in the most Kool Aid-besotted corners of the intellectual right.

Like a dogwalker who’s forgotten his plastic baggie, he simply left behind the turd and kept moving.

Next came a trial balloon of an attack on Mitt Romney: that, in the realm of healthcare, the former Massachusetts governor played a sort of John the Baptist role to Obama’s Jesus. “Obamneycare,” Pawlenty called the new healthcare law—only to furiously, and awkwardly, soften the blow in his first face-to-face encounter with Romney since launching the balloon. [See a slide show of GOP 2012 contenders.]

Newsflash, Tim: The “Obamneycare” coinage won’t catch on unless you really mean it.

With Gingrich finished almost as soon as he started, and Pawlenty sputtering badly in his first attempt to pick up speed, Rep. Michele Bachmann officially took the plunge—adding her number to the ranks of the unelectable alongside kooky Ron Paul; Romney clone Jon Huntsman; Rick “I guess bestiality is next” Santorum; and Herman “right of whose return?” Cain. [Check out political cartoons about the 2012 GOP field.]

For Republicans inclined to Tea Party maximalism, Bachmann’s candidacy is like a promise of help on the way. For everyone else, it sounds more like “Nearer My God To Thee” on the deck of the Titanic.

Needless to say, Romney is actually beginning to look like the frontrunner. Recent polls reflect this, as did Romney himself in an assured debate performance.

His only serious rival, at this point, is Sarah Palin, the acuteness of whose absence last night could only have been exceeded by her presence. But Palin shrewdly realizes that she has nothing to gain from participating in meaningless early debates; with her name recognition already high, and her poll numbers relatively strong, there is no need to risk uttering more gaffes or otherwise reminding people that she’s not very bright. [Vote now: Who won Monday night's GOP debate?]

And so she waits, stalking.

How does Romney redeem his frontrunner chit?

Thus far, he’s saying the requisite things about repealing Obamacare, rejecting American declinism, and renewing the engine of job creation. Not insignificantly, Romney has also demonstrated that he’ll be second to none in the fundraising department.

Talk of Romney’s history of flip-flopping and heresies like, well, Obamneycare, seems to me overblown. If the GOP swallowed John McCain in 2008, it will live with Romney in 2012—especially if, as seems likely, he emerges as the only candidate who can slay the dreaded Obama beast.

The more interesting aspect of Romney’s campaign is how he’s sounded what I’ll call the Mainstream Dog Whistle. Case in point: his acceptance of the scientific consensus on global warming, which promptly elicited the wrath of Rush Limbaugh. This was a brilliant double-dip on Romney’s part: He demonstrated sanity to the commentariat, while reassuring industry stakeholders and the public—which does not take global warming seriously enough to make sacrifices to address it—that he won’t make any moves unless other major carbon emitters (namely, India and China) move with us.

It seems to me that, of all this season’s Republican aspirants, Romney is best positioned to pull off this dance: He’ll be as bad (in the Dennis Rodman sense of “bad”) as he needs to be in the primaries, leaving the truly nutty stuff to the likes of Palin and Bachmann; and then, come general-election time, comfortably re-assume the role of technocratic problem-solver.

As far as the Mormon issue goes, I’ll say this: The country already has elected a man thought by an alarmingly high number of Americans to be a Muslim. And if in 2012 the unemployment rate still hovers at 9 percent, it would entertain voting for a Martian.

Tags:
Jon Huntsman,
Tim Pawlenty,
John McCain,
Ron Paul,
Republican Party,
energy policy and climate change,
2012 presidential election,
healthcare reform,
Michele Bachmann,
Newt Gingrich,
Sarah Palin,
unemployment,
Mitt Romney

Reader Comments Read all comments (18)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

brucette_ You are the misfit !!!

brucetee_ Tell me how swell medicare will be _____WHEN_____ $$$ 15 trillion IS CUT by obamacare and millions added ? BARRY IS CHANGING THE FACE OF MEDICARE...

HUNKY-DORY ??? Even without this $$$ 15 trillion cut, some hospital are refusing medicare patients. Most hospitals and doctors are losing money. Most doctors limit number of medicare patients. Everything is HUNKY-DORY !!!

With $$$ 15 trillion in cuts obamacare will have it numbers improved. With care DROPPING.

TO FUTURE CONTROL COST:

“The Obama health law leaves that up to an unelected board of presidential appointees called the Independent Payment Advisory Board, a cost-cutting panel. The board is a radical departure from Medicare as we’ve known it. Congress cedes nearly all control of Medicare spending to the board on the rationale that budgeting decisions should be shielded from outraged seniors and political pressures. On April 13, the president reiterated that the board would decide what care is “unnecessary” for seniors. Even the CBO cautioned that as the nation’s debt crisis worsens, benefits will be put on the board’s chopping block."

“Will Americans now in their 40s and 50s choose to put their health care in the hands of this cost-cutting board, or pick their own health plan when they retire?”

http://www.lincolnclub.org/2011/04/paul-ryans-premium-support-plan-is-preferable-to-obamas-rationing-panel/

_____

brucet, think democrats will come up with 2011 budget before Oct 1, 2011; when 2012 budget is due. Wonder why the did not pass Oct. 1, 2010 when they owned Congress & the White House ? Were they thinking about Nov. 2, 2010 election ? Didn't do them much good not passing budget did it !!!

Could pass barry's great plan:

"CBO: Obama’s Budget Adds $9.5 Trillion to Deficit"

http://reddogreport.com/2011/03/cbo-obamas-budget-adds-9-5-trillion-to-deficit/

_____

brucet you must be pride of Nancy Pelosi and 81 more Democrats voting against raising debt ceiling. Made barry proud am sure !!!

_____

brucet why don't you talk about ex Reagan economic expert anymore ? ? ?

Bill Hedges of MO 11:08AM June 16, 2011

only some shallow thinker would be so gullible as to think that the insurance industry is going to treat the sick and the elderly in a fair and compassionate manner.

medicare,in it;s current form,has been a saviour for millions of people since it;s inception.

another former member of reagan's economic team was on msmbc's "the last word" 06/14/2011. bruce barlett,reagan's policy analyst and assistant treasury secretary,said, in a nut shell,is that along with spending cuts,there needs to be an increase in revenue;s. in other words,tax increases.

bruce b of NV 11:48PM June 15, 2011

brucetee_ Tell me how swell medicare will be _____WHEN_____ $$$ 15 trillion IS CUT by obamacare and millions added ? BARRY IS CHANGING THE FACE OF MEDICARE...

HUNKY-DORY ??? Even without this $$$ 15 trillion cut, some hospital are refusing medicare patients. Most hospitals and doctors are losing money. Most doctors limit number of medicare patients. Everything is HUNKY-DORY !!!

With $$$ 15 trillion in cuts obamacare will have it numbers improved. With care DROPPING.

TO FUTURE CONTROL COST:

“The Obama health law leaves that up to an unelected board of presidential appointees called the Independent Payment Advisory Board, a cost-cutting panel. The board is a radical departure from Medicare as we’ve known it. Congress cedes nearly all control of Medicare spending to the board on the rationale that budgeting decisions should be shielded from outraged seniors and political pressures. On April 13, the president reiterated that the board would decide what care is “unnecessary” for seniors. Even the CBO cautioned that as the nation’s debt crisis worsens, benefits will be put on the board’s chopping block."

“Will Americans now in their 40s and 50s choose to put their health care in the hands of this cost-cutting board, or pick their own health plan when they retire?”

http://www.lincolnclub.org/2011/04/paul-ryans-premium-support-plan-is-preferable-to-obamas-rationing-panel/

_____

brucet, think democrats will come up with 2011 budget before Oct 1, 2011; when 2012 budget is due. Wonder why the did not pass Oct. 1, 2010 when they owned Congress & the White House ? Were they thinking about Nov. 2, 2010 election ? Didn't do them much good not passing budget did it !!!

Could pass barry's great plan:

"CBO: Obama’s Budget Adds $9.5 Trillion to Deficit"

http://reddogreport.com/2011/03/cbo-obamas-budget-adds-9-5-trillion-to-deficit/

_____

brucet you must be pride of Nancy Pelosi and 81 more Democrats voting against raising debt ceiling. Made barry proud am sure !!!

_____

brucet why don't you talk about ex Reagan economic expert anymore ? ? ?

Bill Hedges of MO 7:34PM June 15, 2011

Scott Galupo

Scott Galupo

Scott Galupo is a Washington-based freelance writer. He formerly worked for House Republican Leader John Boehner, and was a staff writer for The Washington Times.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement