Canada Shows Universal Healthcare Doesn't Mean Universal Health

March 1, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (5)

A study of 14,800 Canadians—all of whom, it goes without saying, have access to the country’s universal, single-payer healthcare system—found that disparities in health outcomes between low- and high-income citizens are incredibly stubborn.

The research team concluded that lifestyle is often the decisive factor: “Our findings suggest the need to introduce large-scale preventive strategies early in patients’ lives to help change unhealthy behavior.” [See a slide show of 10 ways the GOP can take down Obamacare.]

Affordable Care Act booster Ezra Klein comments: “[T]he best way to make people healthier would be to get healthcare costs under control so there’s more money in the budget for things like early-childhood education and efforts to strip lead out of walls...”

And Affordable Care Act booster Matthew Yglesias comments: “Over the past 20 years, corporate compensation costs have been rising much faster than wages. That’s because employers are paying more for health benefits ... The fact that we keep defaulting in that direction reflects the political and social clout of the healthcare sector, but the evidence is pretty overwhelming that providing healthcare services is not a cost-effective way of promoting health. Most people would be better off with more money and less healthcare coverage.”

To which all I can say is: Now they tell us! [Check out a roundup of political cartoons on healthcare.]

Tags:
politics,
Canada,
healthcare reform

Reader Comments Read all comments (5)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

ニースの情報;)あなたの時間...ありがとう;)

appliance repair Los Angeles of AL 4:47AM September 23, 2011

Even with that disparity, it's amazing that the average Canadian still outlives the average American by at least three years and no one in the Canadian population has to worry about financial ruin because they suddenly and unexpectantly become ill with a disease. They don't have to worry about losing coverage just because of the fact that they've been laid off and don't have insurance. While I don't believe that the Canadian system is perfect (or that there is a such thing as a perfect system) I do believe that there is something to be learned from the Canadian system.

Christopher Nunn of IL 10:24AM March 14, 2011

Not to worry, Terra. You do have the correct impression. Those many Canadians and those tons of articles were telling you of their reality. Thanks for your sharing. It fits perfectly with what you will find confirmed in a poll of Canadians.

http://www.mforall.org/p/Canada

Bob Haiducek, Bob the Health and Health Care Advocate

Bob the Health and Health Care Advocate of MI 9:37PM March 02, 2011

Scott Galupo

Scott Galupo

Scott Galupo is a Washington-based freelance writer. He formerly worked for House Republican Leader John Boehner, and was a staff writer for The Washington Times.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement