Obama's Right, America Needs an Industrial Policy

January 25, 2011 RSS Feed Print
  • Comment (3)

“Industrial policy.”

In tonight’s State of the Union address, President Obama won’t utter those exact words. Instead, he’ll talk about “innovation” and “infrastructure” and  “education”—things we’ll need to invest in as a nation in order to remain competitive in the global economy.

[See photos of the Obamas behind the scenes.]

In so many words, the president thinks we need an industrial policy: a national economic strategy in which, on some level, the public and private sectors form a partnership.

And he’s right.

Andrew Liveris, the chairman and CEO of Dow Chemical, argues for such a strategy in his book Make It in America: The Case for Re-Inventing the Economy. Liveris echoes many of the themes of another important recent book I’ve mentioned here: Clyde Prestowitz’s The Betrayal of American Prosperity: Free Market Delusions, America’s Decline, and How We Must Compete in the Post-Dollar Era.

The situation is this: America has been consuming more than it produces for decades, a bargain we’ve been able to pull off because we’re the country that prints dollars. But emerging economies like India, China, and Brazil aren’t going to play along forever. [Take the poll: What Should Obama's State of the Union focus be?]

To stop running large trade deficits, America will need to revive its manufacturing base—to start making things again.

Which things? This is where “industrial policy” comes in.

The phrase has gotten an unnecessarily bad rap in the modern era. It smacks of heavy-handed government: socialism, corporatism, even fascism. Call it whatever you want, but America used to do it unapologetically. It’s how we were able to build a transcontinental railroad system. It’s how we got the telegraph, companies like RCA, and the Internet.

And we still have one now. The problem is, it’s ad hoc; it's aimless and, in some cases, counterproductive. We subsidize agriculture, and we maintain an energy policy that favors cars and airplanes. More positively, under a Republican administration, America doubled funding for the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Unsurprisingly, we’re an industry leader in biotechnology. [Check out a roundup of political cartoons on Obama.]

How did this come to pass?

As Prestowitz notes, during the Cold War era, geopolitical concerns trumped economic ones. It was more important to secure the loyalty of Western Europe and Japan, and eventually the oil of the Middle East, than it was to see the world in terms of nonapocalyptic economic rivalries.

We can’t afford to think that way anymore. We can’t afford to keep borrowing money from the Chinese to pay for oil from Saudi Arabia. 

The “smiley curve”—a phrase used to describe how the West makes the big bucks: design, engineering, and retail, while low-wage Chinese snap together parts— is going to start bending unfavorably.

Liveris notes that, increasingly, the countries that snap together the parts are going to be the ones that generate the next big ideas—a phenomenon often referred to as the “innovation ecosystem.”

China, South Korea, and other countries that have successfully maintained export-led growth strategies are far less impressed by free-trade doctrines such as “comparative advantage.” Prestowitz argues that Korea wanted a semiconductor industry. So it invested in one. [Read A Brief History of the State of the Union.]

Comparative-advantage theory says China should leave aircraft manufacturing to established companies like Boeing and Airbus. But China, realizing the benefits of building its own airplanes, blithely ignores comparative-advantage theory.

America needs to start doing the same thing.

The occasion of Ronald Reagan’s 100th birthday has inspired lots of recollections of the former president’s dictum that “Government isn’t the solution. Government is the problem.”

But that’s no longer the case. The choice we face today is between smart government and dumb government.

Tags:
manufacturing,
South Korea,
China,
energy policy and climate change,
NIH,
India

Reader Comments Read all comments (3)

Add Your Thoughts
Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Obamas right , we need an industrial policy , are you kidding ? All of a sudden this idea just poped out of Obamas butt ! How about a policy of lower taxes , less goverment regulations and red tape , the list can go on , things the right and the Tea Party have said for years and Reagan proved worked

Hunter of WI 8:28PM January 25, 2011

'Investing' tax money is code speak for more spread da wealth, very selectively, by picking winners and losers in advance, on the basis of what someone 'thinks' should be done.

For the next five better yet ten years, dump the notion of 'investing' tax money in this, that, or the other. We'll be better poised to take on the future for it.

dom youngross of OH 6:05PM January 25, 2011

WHAT !!!!! Ok, later you said we produce. Just want to make it crsytal clear we are now world leader:

"Manufacturing Surprise: The U.S. Still Leads In Making Things"

By John Keefe | Jun 21, 2010

"We all know that the U.S. has lost ground as a manufacturing power in the world economy, thanks to emerging countries’ ability to make things more cheaply. But did you know that in spite of all the rhetoric, and more to the point the erosion of those important advantages, the U.S. is still the world’s leading manufacturer? It is, but won’t be for long."

http://moneywatch.bnet.com/economic-news/blog/macro-view/manufacturing-surprise-the-us-still-leads-in-making-things/2134/

Universities are already working with business. Have no problem with more. We Americans joined in joint venture to manufactory new batteries. This new plant will give us over supply. America already has these battery type plants. Am sure present plants would be happy to add a line or go to 3 shifts. Expand if necessary. How is this like rail roads in 1800's when success was not assured.

Reagan's “Government isn’t the solution. Government is the problem” is still correct. Government now requires business to make out a 1099 for every $600. That is added cost.

Closing down Gulf and other areas for oil mean more imported oil. Believe Canada is biggest imported for us. Oil from oil shale:

"Estimated U.S. oil shale reserves total an astonishing 1.5 trillion barrels of oil – or more than five times the stated reserves of Saudi Arabia. This energy bounty is simply too large to ignore any longer, assuming that the reserves are economically viable. And yet, oil shale lies far from the radar screen of most investors."

Most on government land.

Oil Shale Reserves http://dailyreckoning.com/oil-shale-reserves/#ixzz1C5NE04Re

Burn oil found in America instead of import. Government needs the oil royalties, we need the high paying jobs. Tell barry to stop waving regulations for his buddy BP.

We know jobs created by stimulus were very expensive ones. Better done by private sector. Most of time tax credits can do the job.

Bill Hedges of MO 5:08PM January 25, 2011

Scott Galupo

Scott Galupo

Scott Galupo is a Washington-based freelance writer. He formerly worked for House Republican Leader John Boehner, and was a staff writer for The Washington Times.

advertisement

Robert Schlesinger

An End to the NRA’s Angry Swagger

Polls show that overwhelming majorities of Americans, and even of NRA members, favor universal background checks.

Mary Kate Cary

Washington’s Toxic Stew

President Obama's burgeoning problems affect more than this week’s three scandals.

Latest Videos

advertisement